Sadly, anxiety and stress exist all around us. While anxiety has previously been studied in traditional foreign language environments, no information exists about anxiety in an online foreign language environment. Withouthaving a detailed understanding of potential problems in an online environment, educators, administrators, and course designers would not be able to help struggling, suffering students. Thus, the purpose of this seven-participant pilot study was to develop a more refined understanding of foreign language anxiety in the online learning environment. In some respects, the results of this？study confirm what foreign language educators already know: students prefer writing rather than speaking, interacting with the instructor rather than with peers, and keeping up with the work is sometimes a challenge. Additionally, if students don’t know basic grammatical elements in their native language,？there may be issues in the target language. Yet, researchers can now begin to understand additional components of anxiety that were not examined previously in online foreign language courses in a more nuanced manner.
Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class Differences: Online Education in the United States, 2010 (pp. 1-26). Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States, 2010 (pp. 1-26). Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
Bertin, J.-C., Gravé, P., & Narcy-Combes, J.-P. (2010). Second Language Distance Learning and Teaching: Theoretical Perspectives and Didactic Ergonomics. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-707-7
Chametzky, B. (2013b). Offsetting the Affective Filter: A Classic Grounded Theory Study of Post-Secondary Online Foreign Language Learners. Doctoral Dissertation, San Diego: Northcentral University. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#results?q=3570240
Gibson, J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
http://books.google.com/books?id=DrhCCWmJpWUC&printsec=frontcover&dq= james+gibson&hl=en&sa=X&ei=RdP1TqaDJOjj0QHJ9fmFAg&ved=0CEYQ6AEwAA#v= onepage&q=james%20gibson&f=false
Jashapara, A., & Tai, W.-C. (2011). Knowledge Mobilization through e-Learning Systems: Understanding the Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy and Anxiety on Perceptions of Ease of Use. Information Systems Management, 28, 71-83.
Kilic-Cakmak, E., Karatas, S., & Ocak, M. (2009). An Analysis of Factors Affecting Community College Students’ Expectations One-Learning [sic]. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10, 351-363.
Myers, C. (2008). Divergence in Learning Goal Priorities between College Students and Their Faculty: Implications for Teaching and Learning. College Teaching, 56, 53-58.
National Institute of Health, Office of Human Subjects Research (1979). Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.
Pichette, F. (2009). Second Language Anxiety and Distance Language Learning. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 77-93. http://www.actfl.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3320
Salcedo, C. S. (2010). Comparative Analysis of Learning Outcomes in Face-to-Face Foreign Language Classes vs. Language Lab and Online. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7, 43-54. http://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/TLC