全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Investigating the Potential of Technology to Promote Development and the Ethical and Social Implications of Technological Innovation in the Context of Development

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109936, PP. 1-23

Subject Areas: Philosophy

Keywords: Technology, Development, Ethics, Innovation, Social Implications

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive investigation of the potential of technology to promote development, and the ethical and social implications of technological innovation in the context of development. Through a thorough review of the literature, we explore the concept of development and its relationship with technology, as well as the ethical and social concerns associated with technological innovation in development contexts. We draw on a range of sources, including scholarly articles, reports, and case studies, to analyze the potential of technology to promote economic, social, and environmental progress in developing countries. We also examine ethical frameworks and principles for evaluating technological innovation in development, including the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the principle of technology justice. Our findings suggest that while technology has great potential to promote development, its implementation must be guided by ethical considerations and a commitment to social justice. We conclude by highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and participatory approaches in the development and implementation of technological solutions for development.

Cite this paper

Ebua, E. J. (2023). Investigating the Potential of Technology to Promote Development and the Ethical and Social Implications of Technological Innovation in the Context of Development. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e9936. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109936.

References

[1]  Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 3.
[2]  United Nations (2015) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, New York, 7.
[3]  Daly, R., Moore, S., and Khan, M. (2019) Public Sector Adoption of Cloud Computing: A Systematic Literature Review. Government Information Quarterly, 36.
[4]  The Daily Star (2019) Only 14% Have Broadband Internet Access: BTRC. https://www.thedailystar.net/
[5]  UNESCO (2019) IITE Policy Brief. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education, Paris, 3.
[6]  Oyedele, A. (2019) E-Government and the Challenge of Development in Africa. Routledge, Abingdon, 54.
[7]  Muro, L. and Andaluz, J. (2017) How Does Technological Development Affect Economic Growth? An Overview. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 7.
[8]  Warschauer, M. and Ames, M.G. (2010) Can One Laptop per Child Save the World’s Poor? Journal of International Affairs, 64, 33-51.
[9]  Heeks, R. (2018) Innovation in Development: A Review of Recent Research. Journal of Development Studies, 54.
[10]  UNDP (2019) Human Development Report 2019. Beyond Income, beyond Averages, beyond Today: Inequalities in Human Development in the 21st Century. United Nations Development Programme, New York, 15.
[11]  Barbour, I.G. (1993) Ethics in an Age of Technology. Harper Collins Publishers, San Francisco, 3.
[12]  Muro, M. and Andaluz, J. (2017) The Advantages of Manufacturing in California’s Inland Empire: Innovation, Location, and Infrastructure. Brookings Institution Report.
[13]  Ellul, J. (1964) The Technological Society. Trans. J. Wilkinson, Knopf, New York, 62.
[14]  Appelbaum, R.P. and Robinson, J.A. (2015) Can Technology Deliver Us from Inequality? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 45-66.
[15]  Deichmann, U., Goyal, A. and Mishra, D. (2016) Will Digital Technologies Transform Agriculture in Developing Countries? Agricultural Economics, 47, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12300
[16]  World Bank (2016) World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016
[17]  Stiglitz, J.E. (2013) The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 76.
[18]  Noble, S.U. (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press, New York, 15. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5
[19]  Brynjolfsson, E. and McAfee, A. (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton &Company, New York, 54.
[20]  Postman, N. (1992) Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. Vintage, New York, 71.
[21]  Kaplan, B. and Litewka, S. (2008) Ethical Challenges of Telemedicine and Telehealth. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 17, 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180108080535
[22]  Broussard, M. (2017) Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. MIT Press, Cambridge, 325. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11022.001.0001
[23]  Kumar, S. and Best, M. L. (2006) Managing Technology Investments: A Framework for Decision Making Based on Innovation Capability, Linking Processes and Financial Returns. International Journal of Technology Management, 34, 80-107
[24]  Castells, M. (2010) The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, Volume 1. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 57.
[25]  Appiah, F.K. and Kyeremeh, K. (2019) Effects of Social Media on Academic Performance: A Case Study of Students in a Ghanaian University. Journal of Education and Practice, 10, 32-37.
[26]  Nambisan, S. and Nambisan, P. (2008) How to Profit from a Better “Virtual Customer Environment”. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49, 53-61.
[27]  Metcalf, J. and Crawford, K. (2016) Where Are Human Subjects in Big Data Research? The Emerging Ethics Divide. Big Data & Society, 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211
[28]  Ball, K. and Snider, L. (2018) The Biometric Border: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror. Political Geography, 65, 109-118.
[29]  Burrell, J. (2016) How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
[30]  Toyama, K. (2017) Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology. Public Affairs, New York.
[31]  Warschauer, M. (2002) Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide. First Monday, 7. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i7.967
[32]  Mitra, S. and Dangwal, R. (2010) Limits to Self-Organizing Systems of Learning— The Kalikuppam Experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 672-688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01077.x
[33]  Papert, S. (2005) You Can’t Think about Thinking without Thinking about Thinking about Something. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5, 366-367.
[34]  Ramaswamy, S. (2018) The Aadhaar Biometric Identification System in India: A Technology for Surveillance? Journal of Asian Studies, 77, 959-977.
[35]  Ramaswamy, S. (2018) Aadhaar and Its Controversies. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 20, 237-247.
[36]  Boucher, P. and Hackett, R. (2017) The Use of Drones in Humanitarian Aid and Development: A Critical Review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 26, 97-109.
[37]  ITU (2019) Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures 2019. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2019.pdf
[38]  Livemint (2019) 65% of Urban India Has Internet Access, Rural Areas Lag behind: IAMAI Report. https://www.livemint.com/industry/telecom/65-of-urban-india-has-internet-access-rural-areas-lag-behind-iamai-report-1568809703814.html
[39]  IBGE (2020) PNAD Contínua: Acesso à Internet e à Televisão e Posse de Telefone Móvel Celular para Uso Pessoal. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/educacao/9171-pnad-continua.html
[40]  The Daily Star (2019) Bangladesh’s Impressive Progress in ICT. https://www.thedailystar.net/
[41]  Forti, V., Baldé, C.P., Kuehr, R. and Bel, G. (2020) The Global E-Waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, Flows and the Circular Economy Potential. United Nations University (UNU)/United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR)—Co-Hosted SCYCLE Programme, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), Bonn/Geneva/Rotterdam. https://ewastemonitor.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GEM_2020_def_july1_low.pdf
[42]  Baldé, C.P., Forti V., Gray, V., Kuehr, R. and Stegmann, P. (2017) The Global E-waste Monitor 2017: Quantities, Flows and Resources. United Nations University (UNU), International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), Bonn/Geneva/Rotterdam. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Climate-Change/Documents/GEM%202017/Global-E-waste%20Monitor%202017%20.pdf
[43]  EPA (2021) Electronics Donation and Recycling. https://www.epa.gov/recycle/electronics-donation-and-recycling
[44]  Aladesanmi, A.T. and Ayo, C.K. (2018) Cybersecurity Challenges in Africa. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 12, 1-13.
[45]  Steyn, G. (2021) Cybersecurity in South Africa: Trends, Challenges and Recommendations. Institute for Security Studies, Pretoria. https://issafrica.org/
[46]  Azzi, C. (2021) Cybersecurity in Kenya: Trends and Challenges. United Nations University, Tokyo.
[47]  Smith, A. (2019) Egypt’s Cyber Security Dilemma: Balancing Control and Access. Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/north-africa-west-asia/egypts-cyber-security-dilemma-balancing-control-and-access/
[48]  Adepetun, A. (2018) Cybersecurity Threats on Nigerian Financial Institutions: A Critical Evaluation of the Role of IT Governance in Enhancing Cybersecurity. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 12, 149-163.
[49]  Khan, M. (2021) Technological Innovation and Human Rights: An Analysis of the Global South. Routledge, London, 50.
[50]  Baumgarte, S. and Riedl, M. (2019) The Dark Side of Technology: An Ethical, Legal, and Social Perspective. Springer, Berlin, 183.
[51]  Anderson, E. and Anderson, S.L. (2007) Machine Ethics: Creating an Ethical Intelligent Agent. AI Magazine, 28, 15.
[52]  Wajcman, J. (2010) Feminist Theories of Technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben057
[53]  European Union (2016) General Data Protection Regulation. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
[54]  Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013) Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 1: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/towards-the-circular-economy-vol-1-an-economic-and-business-rationale-for-an
[55]  Scholz, T. and Smith, A. (2016) Digital Labor and the Future of Work. Routledge, London, 8.
[56]  Johnson, D.G., Loukissas, Y.A. and Rooksby, J. (2016) Data, Design, and Inequality. In: Lupton, D., Ed., Digital Health: Critical and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, Routledge, London, 76.
[57]  Luna, D., Almerares, A., Mayan, J.C., de Quiros, F.G.B., Otero, C. and Bottaro, F. (2016) Mobile Health Technology for Improving Symptom Management in Low and Middle Income Countries. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Publishers, New Rochelle, NY, 234.
[58]  Bateman, R. (2015) Digital Financial Services and Poverty Reduction. In: Goldberg, M.T. and Somé, S.O., Eds., Digital Financial Services: Foundations for a Sustainable Future, World Bank Group, Washington DC, 135.
[59]  Kensing, F. and Madsen, K. H. (2015) A Decade of Participatory Design in Development: A Review of the PD Conference Series 2002-2012. Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers-Volume 1, Aarhus, 15-19 August 2016, 88.
[60]  Burrell, J., Toyama, K. and Young, J.E. (2018) Participatory Design in International Development. In: Lupton, D., Ed., Digital Health: Critical and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, Routledge, London, 15.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413