全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Research Data Management in China: Can Librarians Bring a Paradigm Shift?

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1108341, PP. 1-11

Subject Areas: Information Science, Library, Intelligence and Philology

Keywords: Research Data Management, Stakeholders, Librarians, Relationship, Stakeholders’ Relationship

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Research data management (RDM) practices in China are underdeveloped despite the release of RDM policy on 2nd April 2018 and research to unearth these challenges cannot be overemphasized. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship among critical stakeholders in RDM specifically from librarians’ perspective to speed up the RDM agenda for maximum benefit. This study used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to study the relationship among critical stakeholders in RDM. The findings revealed that the relationships among different stakeholders are significantly positive, and that institutions mediate the positive effect of Librarian on researchers’ work. The effect of government on librarians is not significant. This later finding may be largely due to the poor attitudes of government towards the librarians, however, there could be a positive mediating effect rather than direct. This means that the librarians could bring a paradigm shift in RDM. Librarians should take a leadership role in RDM and should be involved in decision making. This could be the way forward to change the status quo in RDM. This study contributes to the discourse by helping to strengthen the existing relationship and also to understand the role of librarians in RDM.

Cite this paper

Zotoo, I. K. , Liu, G. , Lu, Z. and Essien, F. K. (2022). Research Data Management in China: Can Librarians Bring a Paradigm Shift?. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e8341. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108341.

References

[1]  Semeler, A.R., Pinto, A.L. and Rozados, H.B.F. (2019) Data Science in Data Librarianship: Core Competencies of a Data Librarian. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51, 771-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617742465
[2]  Schmidt, B., et al. (2016) Time to Adopt: Librarians’ New Skills and Competency Profiles. 20th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Göttingen, 7-9 June 2016, 1-8.
[3]  Liu, G., Zotoo, I.K. and Su, W. (2020) Research Data Management Policies in USA, UK and Australia Universities: An Online Survey. Malaysian Journal of Library Information Science, 25, 21-42.
[4]  Huang, Y.S., Cox, A.M. and Sbaffi, L. (2021) Research Data Management Policy and Practice in Chinese University Libraries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72, 493-506. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24413
[5]  Tenopir, C., et al. (2017) Research Data Services in European Academic Research Libraries. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 27, 23-44. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10180
[6]  Cox, A.M., et al. (2019) Maturing Research Data Services and the Transformation of Academic Libraries. Journal of Documentation, 75, 1432-1462. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2018-0211
[7]  Whitehead, M. and Bourne-Tyson, D. (2016) Multi-Stakeholder Engagement in Research Data Management. International Association of University Libraries.
[8]  Chen, X.J. and Wu, M. (2017) Survey on the Needs for Chemistry Research Data Management and Sharing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43, 346-353.
[9]  Hall, N., et al. (2013) Model Language for Research Data Management Policies. ASERL & SURA, Atlanta. https://libraopen.lib.virginia.edu/public_view/s1784k74p
[10]  Darch, P.T., et al. (2020) Do the Stars Align: Stakeholders and Strategies in Libraries’ Curation of an Astronomy Dataset. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72, 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24392
[11]  Vilar, P. and Zabukovec, V. (2019) Research Data Management and Research Data Literacy in Slovenian Science. Journal of Documentation, 75, 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2018-0042
[12]  Verbaan, E. and Cox, A.M. (2014) Occupational Sub-Cultures, Jurisdictional Struggle and Third Space: Theorising Professional Service Responses to Research Data Management. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40, 211-219.
[13]  Whyte, A. (2014) A Pathway to Sustainable Research Data Services: From Scoping to Sustainability. In: Pryor, G., Jones, S. and Whyte, A., Eds., Delivering Research Data Management Services: Fundamentals of Good Practice, Facet, London, 59-88. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783300242.005
[14]  Jolak, R., et al. (2018) Does Distance Still Matter? Revisiting Collaborative Distributed Software Design. IEEE Software, 35, 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.290100920
[15]  Alvaro, P., et al. (2011) Consistency Analysis in Bloom: A CALM and Collected Approach. 5th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, Asilomar, 9-12 January 2011, 249-260.
[16]  Corrall, S., Kennan, M.A. and Afzal, W. (2013) Bibliometrics and Research Data Management Services: Emerging Trends in Library Support for Research. Library Trends, 61, 636-674. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2013.0005
[17]  Lyon, L. and Pink, C. (2012) University of Bath Roadmap for EPSRC: Compliance with Research Data Management Expectations.
[18]  Cox, A.M. and Pinfield, S. (2014) Research Data Management and Libraries: Current Activities and Future Priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46, 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000613492542
[19]  Zotoo, I.K., Lu, Z. and Liu, G. (2021) Big Data Management Capabilities and Librarians’ Innovative Performance: The Role of Value Perception Using the Theory of Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capability. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47, Article ID: 102272.
[20]  Faniel, I.M. and Connaway, L.S. (2018) Librarians’ Perspectives on the Factors Influencing Research Data Management Programs. College & Research Libraries, 79, 100-119.
[21]  Auckland, M. (2012) Re-Skilling for Research: An Investigation into the Role and Skills of Subject and Liaison Librarians Required to Effectively Support the Evolving Information Needs of Researchers. Research Libraries UK, London.
[22]  Malthouse, E.C., et al. (2019) Beyond Reciprocal: The Role of Platforms in Diffusing Data Value across Multiple Stakeholders. Journal of Service Management, 30, 507-518. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-12-2018-0381
[23]  Frederick, A. and Run, Y. (2019) The Role of Academic Libraries in Research Data Management: A Case in Ghanaian University Libraries. Open Access Library Journal, 6, 1-16.
[24]  Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
[25]  Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q.H. and Lai, K.H. (2011) An Organizational Theoretic Review of Green Supply Chain Management Literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.010
[26]  Wang, X.J. and Huang, J. (2006) The Relationships between Key Stakeholders’ Project Performance and Project Success: Perceptions of Chinese Construction Supervising Engineers. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.006
[27]  Duncan, W. (2005) Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Automated Graphic Systems, Charlotte, NC.
[28]  Angus, G.Y., Flett, D. and Bowers, J.A. (2005) Developing a Value-Centred Proposal for Assessing Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.008
[29]  Rowley, T.J. (1997) Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887-910. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107
[30]  Zotoo, I.K. (2021) Figure 2, in Research 2021, C. Framework, Editor.
[31]  Peritz, B.C. (1980) The Methods of Library Science Research: Some Results from a Bibliometric Survey. Library Research, 2, 251-268.
[32]  Ullah, A. and Ameen, K. (2018) Account of Methodologies and Methods Applied in LIS Research: A Systematic Review. Library & Information Science Research, 40, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.03.002
[33]  Hair Jr., J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. 7th Edition, Prentice Hall International Editions, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[34]  Hair, J.F., et al. (2016) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
[35]  Carrión, G.C., Nitzl, C. and Roldán, J.L. (2017) Mediation Analyses in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines and Empirical Examples. In: Latan, H. and Noonan, R., Eds., Partial Least Squares Path Modeling, Springer, Cham, 173-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_8
[36]  Arnott, J.C., et al. (2020) Sponsoring Actionable Science: What Public Science Funders Can Do to Advance Sustainability and the Social Contract for Science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.006
[37]  Das, T. (2020) Academic Library Collaborations to Strengthen Open Government Data and Expand Librarianship. In: Open Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global, Hershey, 1187-1206.
[38]  Newton, M.P., Miller, C.C. and Bracke, M.S. (2010) Librarian Roles in Institutional Repository Data Set Collecting: Outcomes of a Research Library Task Force. Collection Management, 36, 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2011.530546
[39]  Moher, D., et al. (2020) The Hong Kong Principles for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity. PLoS Biology, 18, e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
[40]  Oldroyd, R. (1995) Staff Development and Appraisal in an “Old” University Library. Librarian Career Development, 3, 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/09680819510083435
[41]  Nwaigwe, U. (2015) The Influence of Head Librarians’ Leadership Styles on Job Satisfaction of Librarians’ in Tertiary Institution Libraries in Imo State, Nigeria. Open Access Library Journal, 2, 1-9.
[42]  Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.M. (2015) SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com
[43]  Kim, J.H. (2020) Academic Library’s Leadership and Stakeholder Involvement in Research Data Services. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science Technology, 57, e304. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.304
[44]  Zotoo, I.K. and Liu, G. (2019) Research Data Management (RDM) Strategy for Academic Libraries in Ghana: Setting a National Development Agenda. Open Access Library Journal, 6, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105383
[45]  Li, G., Lim, M.K. and Wang, Z.H. (2020) Stakeholders, Green Manufacturing, and Practice Performance: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Fashion Businesses. Annals of Operations Research, 290, 961-982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03157-7

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413