全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Measuring the Degrees of Openness of Educational Journals in China with the Open Access Spectrum (OAS) Evaluation Tool

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1108245, PP. 1-13

Subject Areas: Library, Intelligence and Philology, Journalism and Communication

Keywords: Open Access, Degrees of Openness, Open Access Spectrum Evaluation Tool

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

At present, the information dissemination and acquisition behavior of scholarly journals have undergone great changes. Electronic resources have become an important information source, and the subjects of network information release have become increasingly large, and instant access to information has become the mainstream trend. In order to promote the dissemination and exchange of academic information in the era of big data, and promote free and convenient access to scientific research results, more and more journals in China have joined the ranks of “open access”. This paper aims to reveal the openness of educational journals in China, so that readers, researchers, research institutions and publishers can better understand the status quo of open access of Chinese journals. This study will adopt the OAS tool proposed by SPARC, select 284 educational journals collected by CNKI as the research samples, and combine the actual situation in China, make appropriate improvements to the open evaluation tool, and use the improved evaluation tool and evaluation system to evaluate the openness of Chinese educational journals.

Cite this paper

Lv, D. (2021). Measuring the Degrees of Openness of Educational Journals in China with the Open Access Spectrum (OAS) Evaluation Tool. Open Access Library Journal, 8, e8245. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108245.

References

[1]  Suber, P. (2012) Open Access. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9286.001.0001
[2]  Teplitzky, S. and Phillips, M.E. (2016) Evaluating the Impact of Open Access at Berkeley: Results from the 2015 Survey of Berkeley Research Impact Initiative (BRII) Funding Recipients. College & Research Libraries, 77, 568-581. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.568
[3]  Nariani, R. and Fernandez, L. (2012) Open Access Publishing: What Authors Want. College & Research Libraries, 73, 182-195. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-203
[4]  Beard, R.M. (2016) An Investigation of Graduate Student Knowledge and Usage of Open-Access Journals. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 28, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2016.1130453
[5]  Neuman, Y. and Laakso, M. (2017) Balancing Ideology and Feasibility: A Case Study on Adopting and Evaluating Open Access Publishing Models for a Society Journal within Philosophy. Information Research, 22, No. 4.
[6]  Zawacki-Richter, O., Anderson, T. and Tuncay, N. (2010) The Growing Impact of Open Access Distance Education Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Distance Education, 24, No. 3.
[7]  McCabe, M.J., Snyder, C.M. and Fagin, A. (2013) Open Access versus Traditional Journal Pricing: Using a Simple “Platform Market” Model to Understand Which Will Win (and Which Should). The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.035
[8]  Arendt, J., Peacemaker, B., et al. (2019) Same Question, Different World: Replicating an Open Access Research Impact Study. College & Research Libraries, 80, 303- 318. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.3.303

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413