All Title Author
Keywords Abstract


Students’ Journal Paper Citing and Choice of Publisher: The Mediating Roles of Impact Factor and H-Index as Bibliometric Measures

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1105696, PP. 1-10

Subject Areas: Library, Intelligence and Philology

Keywords: Journal Citation Preference, Impact Factor, H-Index, Research Publications

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between journal citation preference (JCP) of scholars and their choice for publisher (CP) for their research papers. The study also considers the mediating roles played by journal impact factor (IF) and H-index (HI) on this relationship. Multiples linear regression analysis and the PROCESS Macro statistical tool were used to assess the main effects and mediating effects between the studied variables. From findings, CP had a 49.1%, 66.7% and 53.0% chance of its variations being explained by a unit increase in JCP, IF and HI respectively. In practical sense, the decision of a research student for a journal paper publisher is explained by the type of journal papers cited in the study up to about 50.0%, ceteris paribus. Impact factor (IF) played a significant mediating role on the relationship between JCP and CP with an r2 of 0.588 against a 0.434 direct effect. Fir HI, an r2 of 0.086 against a direct effect coefficient of 0.434 did not show significant mediation. It implies therefore that CP is influenced mostly by IF of journals.

Cite this paper

Ahmed, A. R. , Zhang, X. and Yu, S. (2019). Students’ Journal Paper Citing and Choice of Publisher: The Mediating Roles of Impact Factor and H-Index as Bibliometric Measures. Open Access Library Journal, 6, e5696. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105696.

References

[1]  Porter, S.R. and Toutkoushian, R.K. (2006) Institutional Research Productivity and the Connection to Average Student Quality and Overall Reputation. Economics of Education Review, 25, 605-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.06.003
[2]  Linton, J.D., Tierney, R. and Walsh, S.T. (2011) Publish or Perish: How Are Research and Reputation Related? Serials Review, 37, 244-257.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2011.09.001
[3]  Abrams, R.W., Abrams, J.F. and Abrams, A.L. (2018) Climate Change Challenges for Africa. Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene, 2, 177-194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09754-8
[4]  Venn, A. (2019) 24—Social Justice and Climate Change. In: Letcher, T.M., Ed., Managing Global Warming: An Interface of Technology and Human Issues, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 711-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814104-5.00024-7
[5]  Mouratiadou, I., Biewald, A., Pehl, M., Bonsch, M., Baumstark, L., Klein, D., Popp, A., Luderer, G. and Kriegler, E. (2016) The Impact of Climate Change Mitigation on Water Demand for Energy and Food: An Integrated Analysis Based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Environmental Science & Policy, 64, 48-58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.007
[6]  Hadjiyiannis, C., Heracleous, M.S. and Tabakis, C. (2016) Regionalism and Conflict: Peace Creation and Peace Diversion. Journal of International Economics, 102, 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.07.001
[7]  G?decke, T., Stein, A.J. and Qaim, M. (2018) The Global Burden of Chronic and Hidden Hunger: Trends and Determinants. Global Food Security, 17, 21-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.03.004
[8]  Ngo, J. and Serra-Majem, L. (2019) Hunger and Malnutrition. Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability, 2, 315-335.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22064-7
[9]  Heyeres, M., Tsey, K., Yang, Y., Yan, L. and Jiang, H. (2019) The Characteristics and Reporting Quality of Research Impact Case Studies: A Systematic Review. Evaluation and Program Planning, 73, 10-23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.11.002
[10]  Hu, C.-S. (2019) Scientific Papers: Which Type Would You Prefer? Journal of Integrative Medicine, 17, 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joim.2019.02.003
[11]  Kovacs, G. and Moshtari, M. (2019) A Roadmap for Higher Research Quality in Humanitarian Operations: A Methodological Perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 276, 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.052
[12]  Baney, A. (2008) “Publish or Perish” as Citation Metrics Used to Analyze Scientific Output in the Humanities: International Case Studies in Economics, Geography, Social Sciences, Philosophy, and History. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 56, 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-008-0043-0
[13]  Barner, J.R., Holosko, M.J., Thyer, B.A. and King, S. (2015) Research Productivity in Top-Ranked Schools in Psychology and Social Work: Does Having a Research Culture Matter? Journal of Social Work Education, 51, 5-18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.977123
[14]  Blagus, R., Leskosek, B.L. and Stare, J. (2015) Comparison of Bibliometric Measures for Assessing Relative Importance of Researchers. Scientometrics, 105, 1743-1762.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1622-6
[15]  Cheng, K.L., Dodson, T.B., Egbert, M.A. and Susarla, S.M. (2017) Which Factors Affect Citation Rates in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Literature? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 75, 1313-1318.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.03.043
[16]  Davalos, S. (2015) One Way to Evaluate the Impact of Scientific Research. Madera y Bosques, 21, 7-16.
[17]  Hodge, D.R., Victor, B.G., Grogan-Kaylor, A. and Perron, B.E. (2017) Disseminating High-Impact Social Work Scholarship: A Longitudinal Examination of 5-Year Citation Count Correlates. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 8, 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1086/691463
[18]  Tijdink, J.K., Schipper, K., Bouter, L.M., Pont, P.M., de Jonge, J. and Smulders, Y.M. (2016) How Do Scientists Perceive the Current Publication Culture? A Qualitative Focus Group Interview Study among Dutch Biomedical Researchers. BMJ Open, 6, e008681. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008681
[19]  Lacasse, J.R., Hodge, D.R. and Bean, K.F. (2011) Evaluating the Productivity of Social Work Scholars Using the h-Index. Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 599-607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511405069
[20]  Mingers, J. and Yang, L.Y. (2017) Evaluating Journal Quality: A Review of Journal Citation Indicators, and Ranking in Business and Management. European Journal of Operational Research, 257, 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.058
[21]  Qian, Y.F., Rong, W.G., Jiang, N., Tang, J. and Xiong, Z. (2017) Citation Regression Analysis of Computer Science Publications in Different Ranking Categories and Subfields. Scientometrics, 110, 1351-1374.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2235-4
[22]  Lopez, J., Susarla, S.M., Swanson, E.W., Luck, J.D., Tuffaha, S. and Lifchez, S.D. (2016) The Effect of Self-Citations on the Hirsch Index among Full-Time Academic Hand Surgeons. Journal of Surgical Education, 73, 317-322.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.10.012
[23]  Susarla, S.M., Swanson, E.W., Lopez, J., Peacock, Z.S. and Dodson, T.B. (2015) Does Self-Citation Influence Quantitative Measures of Research Productivity among Academic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 73, 1981.e1-1981.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.05.018
[24]  Swanson, E.W., Miller, D.T., Susarla, S.M., Lopez, J., Lough, D.M., May, J.W. and Redett, R.J. (2016) What Effect Does Self-Citation Have on Bibliometric Measures in Academic Plastic Surgery? Annals of Plastic Surgery, 77, 350-353.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000585
[25]  Tanner-Smith, E.E. and Polanin, J.R. (2016) Brief Alcohol Intervention Trials Conducted by Higher Prestige Authors and Published in Higher Impact Factor Journals Are Cited More Frequently. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 75, 119-125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.028
[26]  Diem, A. and Wolter, S.C. (2013) The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Performance in Education Sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54, 86-114.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5
[27]  Harzing, A.W. and van der Wal, R. (2009) A Google Scholar h-Index for Journals: An Alternative Metric to Measure Journal Impact in Economics and Business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 41-46.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20953
[28]  Hirsch, J.E. (2005) An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
[29]  Jasco, P. (2008) The Pros and Cons of Computing the h-Index Using Google Scholar. Online Information Review, 32, 437-452.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810889718
[30]  Hodge, D.R. and Lacasse, J.R. (2011) Evaluating Journal Quality: Is the H-Index a Better Measure Than Impact Factors? Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731510369141
[31]  Link, J.M. (2015) Publish or Perish…But Where? What Is the Value of Impact Factors? Nuclear Medicine and Biology, 42, 426-427.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.01.004
[32]  Brito, R. and Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2019) Evaluating Re-search and Researchers by the Journal Impact Factor: Is It Better than Coin Flipping? Journal of Informetrics, 13, 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.009

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus