The purpose of this study is to examine the status and prospect of virtual information services in academic libraries in Kuwait. The study conducted open-ended interviews of managers or heads of information services in 12 academic libraries about management and conduct of virtual information service and the possibilities about the future of these ser-vices. Also observed the functioning of services in 9 libraries. It was found that email was the common method for virtual communication in academic libraries in Kuwait. These libraries lacked in services using live chat and mobile application. Social media was mostly used for an-nouncements and marketing of library services. In addition, private aca-demic libraries provided advanced virtual services as compared to public academic libraries. Eight interviews were conducted by phone due to unavoidable circumstances related to both participants and researcher. One private academic institution did not allow access to its library, denying opportunities for observation. This paper provides insights on the way virtual information services were managed and conducted in these libraries. No similar study was noted in this regional context. The findings may help academic library management a better understanding of the issues and challenges they faced and the opportunities they might benefit in future.
Cite this paper
Rehman, S. U. and Kandari, A. M. A. (2019). Virtual Information Services in Academic Libraries in Kuwait. Open Access Library Journal, 6, e5543. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105543.
Duncan, V. and Gerrard, A. (2011) All Together Now! Integrating Virtual Reference in the Academic Library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50, 280-292. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.50n3.280
Agosto, D.E., Rozaklis, L., Macdonald, C. and Abels, E.G. (2011) A Model of the Reference and Information Service Process: An Educators’ Perspective. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50, 235-244. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.50n3.235
Wan, K. and Diljit, S. (2007) Digital Reference Services in Academic Libraries Building an Information Society for All. Proceedings of the International Conference on Libraries, Information and Society, Kuala Lumpur, 26-27 June 2007, 173-186.
Co?te, M., Kochkina, S. and Mawhinney, T. (2016) Do You Want to Chat? Reevaluating Organization of Virtual Reference Service at an Academic Library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.56n1.36
Nilsen, K. (2006) Comparing Users’ Perspectives of In-Person and Virtual Reference. New Library World, 107, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800610654871
Ruppel, M. and Vecchione, A. (2012) It’s Research Made Easier! SMS and Chat Reference Perceptions. Reference Services Review, 40, 423-448. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321211254689
Luo, L. (2011) Text Reference Service: Delivery, Characteristics and Best Practices. Reference Services Review, 39, 482-496. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321111161449
Shachaf, P. and Horowitz, S.M. (2008) Virtual Reference Service Evaluation: Adherence to RUSA Behavioral Guidelines and IFLA Digital Reference Guidelines. Library & Information Science Research, 30, 122-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.12.002
Beaton, B. (2012), New Technologies for Virtual Reference: A Look at Skype and Twitter. http://www.lib.umich.edu/files/departments/ SkypeTwitter%20112912.pdf
Hendricks, A. and Buchanan, S. (2013) From Exhaustion to Exhilaration: Assessing Librarian Job Satisfaction with Virtual Reference. Library Hi Tech, 31, 42-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311303921
Rahaman, M.S. and Ansari, K. (2011) Virtual Reference Services at the Main Library of King Fahad University of Petroleum and Minerals, Kingdom of Saudi Aarabia: A Case Study. International Journal of Information Research, 1, 1-13.
Kim, J. (2017) User Perception and Use of the Academic Library: A Correlation Analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43, 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.03.002
Pinto, M. and Manso, R.A. (2012) Virtual References Services: Defining the Criteria and Indicators to Evaluate Them. The Electronic Library, 30, 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211204060