全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Solving Kepler’s Equation: Numerical Methods for Engineering Education

DOI: 10.4236/ijaa.2026.164021, PP. 356-388

Keywords: Kepler’s Equation, Newton-Type Iterative Methods, Inverse Interpolation, Stretched Grids, Singular Asymptotics, Bisection Methods, Numerical Results

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study compares numerical methods for the elliptic, parabolic, and hyperbolic forms of Kepler’s equation. Newton-type iterations are combined with initial approximations constructed by bisection and local inverse interpolation using linear, quadratic, ordinary cubic, and piecewise cubic Hermite formulas. The central contribution is a systematic construction of stretched grids guided by the singular behaviour of the inverse mapping as e→ 1 ? and e→ 1 + . Regular, geometrically stretched, and analytically optimised grids are compared for elliptic and hyperbolic cases. Continuation, Wynn’s epsilon algorithm, and homotopy are also examined as alternative means of obtaining initial approximations. Numerical results show that concentrating nodes near the parabolic limit substantially improves local Hermite interpolation and usually leaves only a few final Newton corrections.

References

[1]  Colwell, P. (1993) Solving Kepler’s Equation over Three Centuries. Willmann-Bell.
[2]  Meeus, J. (1998) Astronomical Algorithms. 2nd Edition, Willmann-Bell.
[3]  Danby, J.M.A. (1988) Fundamentals of Celestial Mechanics. 2nd Edition, Willmann-Bell.
[4]  Fitzpatrick, R. (2012) An Introduction to Celestial Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139152310
[5]  Hintz, G.R. (2022) Orbital Mechanics and Astrodynamics: Techniques and Tools for Space Missions. 2nd Edition, Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96573-0
[6]  Giorgilli, A., Locatelli, U. and Sansottera, M. (2026) Celestial Mechanics: Classical and Modern Methods. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009595308
[7]  Bekir, E. (2026) An Alternative Solution to Kepler’s Equation. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 161-175.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2026.163011
[8]  Householder, A.S. (1970) The Numerical Treatment of a Single Nonlinear Equation. McGraw-Hill.
[9]  Tommasini, D. and Olivieri, D.N. (2020) Fast Switch and Spline Scheme for Accurate Inversion of Nonlinear Functions: The New First Choice Solution to Kepler’s Equation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 364, Article ID: 124677.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.124677
[10]  Garcia, C.B. and Zangwill, W.I. (1981) Pathways to Solutions, Fixed Points, and Equilibria. Prentice-Hall.
[11]  Weniger, E.J. (1989) Nonlinear Sequence Transformations for the Acceleration of Convergence and the Summation of Divergent Series. Computer Physics Reports, 10, 189-371.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7977(89)90011-7
[12]  Fitz-Coy, N. and Jang, J.W. (1996) Homotopy Solutions of Kepler’s Equations. Flight Mechanics/Estimation Theory Symposium 1996, Greenbelt, 14-16 May 1996, 307-314.
[13]  Weber, B. (2026) Circular and Elliptical Orbits (). Orbital Mechanics & Astro-Dynamics.
https://orbital-mechanics.space/time-since-periapsis-and-keplers-equation/elliptical-orbits.html
[14]  Barker, T. (1757) An Account of the Discoveries Concerning Comets, with the Way to Find Their Orbits, and Some Improvements in Constructing and Calculating Their Places. Gale Ecco.
[15]  Pathan, A. (2005) A Geometric Derivation and a Solution of Barker’s Equation for the Time of Flight along Parabolic Trajectories. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 58, 82-89.
[16]  Pathan, A. (2008) Euler’s and Barker’s Equations: A Geometric Derivation of the Time of Flight along Parabolic Trajectories. The Mathematical Gazette, 92, 39-49.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025557200182506
[17]  Weber, B. (2026) Parabolic Trajectories (). Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics.
https://orbital-mechanics.space/time-since-periapsis-and-keplers-equation/parabolic-trajectories.html
[18]  Weber, B. (2026) Hyperbolic Trajectories (). Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics.
https://orbital-mechanics.space/time-since-periapsis-and-keplers-equation/hyperbolic-trajectories.html
[19]  Danby, J.M.A. and Burkardt, T.M. (1983) The Solution of Kepler’s Equation, I. Celestial Mechanics, 31, 95-107.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01686811
[20]  Householder, A.S. (1971) Generalizations of an Algorithm of Sebasti?o E Silva. Numerische Mathematik, 16, 375-382.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02165009
[21]  Esmaelzadeh, R. and Ghadiri, H. (2014) Appropriate Starter for Solving the Kepler’s Equation. International Journal of Computer Applications, 89, 31-38.
https://doi.org/10.5120/15517-4394
[22]  Charles, E.D. and Tatum, J.B. (1997) The Convergence of Newton-Raphson Iteration with Kepler’s Equation. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 69, 357-372.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008200607490
[23]  Mikkola, S. (1987) A Cubic Approximation for Kepler’s Equation. Celestial Mechanics, 40, 329-334.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01235850
[24]  Mathar, R.J. (2025) Improved First Estimates to the Solution of Kepler’s Equation. arXiv: 2108.03215.
[25]  Raposo Pulido, V. and Peláez, J. (2017) An Efficient Code to Solve the Kepler Equation. Elliptic Case. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 467, 1702-1713.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx138
[26]  Raposo-Pulido, V. and Peláez, J. (2018) An Efficient Code to Solve the Kepler Equation. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 619, A129.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833563

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133