The Anglophone Crisis, which escalated in 2016, constitutes one of the most consequential constitutional, political, and security challenges confronting Cameroon since reunification. This study examines the Special Status conferred on the North West and South West Regions by Law No. 2019/024 as a possible constitutional response to the governance dimensions of that conflict. Employing qualitative documentary analysis, constitutional interpretation, and comparative institutional analysis, the study situates the Special Status within debates on constitutional accommodation, asymmetric decentralisation, federalism, and conflict transformation. It advances the qualified argument that the arrangement is best interpreted as an intermediate constitutional form: it recognises historical, legal, educational, linguistic, and cultural particularities within a decentralised unitary state, without reallocating sovereignty through a federal settlement or endorsing territorial separation. Its practical efficacy, however, remains limited by insecurity, incomplete fiscal decentralisation, uneven institutional capacity, and persistent political mistrust. Comparative evidence from South Tyrol, Northern Ireland, Aceh, and Scotland suggests that differentiated autonomy is most likely to be effective where formal recognition is combined with clearly specified competences, material resources, democratic legitimacy, and sustained political dialogue. The article concludes that the Special Status should be regarded as an incomplete and revisable institutional framework rather than as a self-executing settlement.
References
[1]
Aime, C. C. C. (2020). Rethinking the Fa？ade of Decentralisation under the 1996 Constitution of Cameroon. Global Campus Human Rights Journal, 4, 135-175.
[2]
Alcock, A. (1970). The History of the South Tyrol Question. Michael Joseph Ltd.
[3]
Aspinall, E. (2009). Combatants to Contractors: The Political Economy of Peace in Aceh. Indonesia, 87, 1-34.
[4]
Bang, H. N., Balgah, R. A., & Buchenrieder, G. (2022). The Ramification of Cameroon’s Anglophone Crisis: Conceptual Analysis of a Looming “Complex Disaster Emergency”. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 7, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-022-00114-1
[5]
Benedikter, T. (2009). The World’s Modern Autonomy Systems: Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial Autonomy. EURAC Research.
[6]
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[7]
Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
[8]
Crawford, J. (2006). The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
[9]
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
[10]
Deyeb, C. N. (2024). Historical Realities and Specificities of the December 2019 Special Status for North West and South West Regions of Cameroon. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8, 1038-1050. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.809089
[11]
Elazar, D. J. (1987). Exploring Federalism. University of Alabama Press.
[12]
Erk, J., & Anderson, L. (2010). The Paradox of Federalism: Does Self-Rule Accommodate or Exacerbate Ethnic Divisions? Regional & Federal Studies, 19, 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560902753388
[13]
Fombad, C. M. (2025). Cameroon’s Bicultural Conundrum: The Anglophone ？Special Status’ Oxymoron. Oslo Law Review, 11, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.18261/olr.11.2.4
[14]
Fonjong, L., & Takougang, J. (2024). The Social Demands behind the Cameroon Anglophone Crisis of 2016 and the Government’s Response: Exploring the Origins of Post-Colonial Conflicts in Africa. Africa Development, 49, 75-100.
[15]
Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221631
[16]
International Crisis Group (2017). Cameroon’s Anglophone Crisis: How to Get to Talks. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/cameroon/272-cameroons-anglophone-crisis-how-get-talks
[17]
International Crisis Group (2023). A Second Look at Cameroon’s Anglophone Special Status (Briefing No. 188). https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-africa/cameroon/b188-second-look-cameroons-anglophone-special-status
[18]
Konings, P., & Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2003). Negotiating an Anglophone Identity: A Study of the Politics of Recognition and Representation in Cameroon. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047402640
[19]
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford University Press.
[20]
Le Vine, V. T. (1964). The Cameroons: From Mandate to Independence. University of California Press.
[21]
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. United States Institute of Peace Press.
[22]
Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review, 65, 682-693. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955513
[23]
Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. Yale University Press.
[24]
McGarry, J., & O’Leary, B. (2009). Power Sharing: New Challenges for Divided Societies. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[25]
Mitchell, J. (2010). Devolution in the UK. Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719053580.001.0001
[26]
Ndiyun, R. K., & Mukonza, R. M. (2025). Cameroon: Fa？ade of Autonomy? The Special Status as a Solution to the Anglophone Crisis. Conflict Studies Quarterly, 50, 72-94. https://doi.org/10.24193/csq.50.4
[27]
Republic of Cameroon (1996). Constitution of the Republic of Cameroon (Law No. 96/06 of 18 January 1996 Revising the Constitution of 2 June 1972).
[28]
Republic of Cameroon (2019a). Law No. 2019/024 of 24 December 2019 to Institute the General Code of Regional and Local Authorities.
[29]
Republic of Cameroon (2019b). Major National Dialogue: Recommendations and Resolutions.
[30]
Rondinelli, D. A. (1981). Government Decentralization in Comparative Perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 47, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/002085238004700205
[31]
Smoke, P. (2003). Decentralisation in Africa: Goals, Dimensions, Myths and Challenges. Public Administration and Development, 23, 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.255
[32]
Takougang, J., & Krieger, M. (1998). African State and Society in the 1990s: Cameroon’s Political Crossroads. Westview Press.
[33]
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2024). Cameroon Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan. United Nations.
[34]
Watts, R. L. (1999). Comparing Federal Systems (2nd ed.). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
[35]
Woelk, J., Palermo, F., & Marko, J. (Eds.) (2008). Tolerance through Law: Self-Governance and Group Rights in South Tyrol. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
[36]
World Bank (2012). Cameroon: The Path to Fiscal Decentralization—Opportunities and Challenges. World Bank.
[37]
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
