全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Isolation and Identification of Pathogenic Bacteria from Traditionally Slaughtered Local Chickens and Assessment of Their Prevalence in Abéché, Chad

DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2026.198023, PP. 277-289

Keywords: Local Chicken, Traditional Slaughter, Bacterial Contamination, Pathogenic Bacteria, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study aimed to isolate and identify pathogenic bacteria associated with traditionally slaughtered local chickens, determine the most prevalent bacterial species, and assess the level of bacterial contamination in the meat of traditionally slaughtered local chickens. The study included 208 samples of traditionally slaughtered local chickens, which were subjected to microbiological examinations to isolate and identify the bacteria based on cultural, microscopic, and appropriate biochemical tests. The study results showed a variation in the total bacterial load levels among the four markets. The large Um Sadoriya market recorded the highest average bacterial count of 7.99 × 106 CFU/g, followed by the Tartuna market with an average of 6.19 × 106 CFU/g, then the Jouri market with an average of 5.66 × 106 CFU/g, while the Old Cow market recorded the lowest average of 5.30 × 106 CFU/g. These results indicate differences in bacterial contamination levels between the markets, with the large Um Sudriya market showing a higher bacterial load compared to the other markets, which may reflect variations in health conditions and methods of handling and preserving meat. The results showed a clear variation in the spread of bacteria among the four markets. Staphylococcus spp. recorded the highest prevalence rate was 47.6%, followed by Shigella spp. At a rate of 34.6% and Escherichia coli at a rate of 33.2%, while Salmonella typhi recorded the lowest rate at about 1%. These results generally indicate a significant level of bacterial contamination, which may be related to poor hygiene, handling, and storage, or contamination during slaughter and sample handling. These results indicate a high level and diversity of bacterial contamination in locally slaughtered traditional chicken, with a clear predominance of Staphylococcus spp., and Salmonella spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae, in addition to the presence of important pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli O157 and Shigella spp. This may reflect the impact of slaughtering, processing, and handling practices, as well as hygiene conditions, on the microbiological safety of locally traditionally slaughtered meat. The results emphasise the importance of enhancing health control and improving slaughtering, handling, and storage practices to reduce the transmission of pathogenic bacteria and minimise health risks associated with the consumption of traditionally slaughtered chicken.

References

[1]  Yue, K., Cao, Q.-Q., Shaukat, A., Zhang, C. and Huang, S.-C. (2024) Insights into the Evaluation, Influential Factors and Improvement Strategies for Poultry Meat Quality: A Review. NPJ Science of Food, 8, Article No. 62.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-024-00306-6
[2]  Dassidi, N., Tellah, M., Adoum, I., Borso, A., Onagbessan, O., Kokou, T., et al. (2023) Morphological and Zootechnical Characterization of the Local Chicken in the Urban Area of Abéché. International Journal of Poultry Science, 22, 5-11.
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2023.5.11
[3]  Hassaballa, K., Zeuh, V., Tellah, M., Logtene, Y.M. and Sembene, M. (2024) Productivity Parameters of Native Chickens in Chad. International Journal of Poultry Science, 23, 72-77.
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2024.72.77
[4]  Aziziyah, A. and Yazji, S. (2012) Monitoring and Investigation of Salmonella in Chicken Shawarma Consumed in Damascus City and Its Rural Areas. Damascus University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28, 335-348.
[5]  Golden, C.E., Rothrock, M.J. and Mishra, A. (2021) Mapping Foodborne Pathogen Contamination Throughout the Conventional and Alternative Poultry Supply Chains. Poultry Science, 100, Article ID: 101157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101157
[6]  World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2024) Measures for the Control of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry Meat. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series 46. FAO/WHO.
[7]  Sousa, D.L.C.d., Limeira, C.H., Casella, T., Araújo, H.G.d., Aquino, V.V.F.d., Neto, D.A., et al. (2025) Pooled Prevalence of Escherichia coli Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles in Poultry: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 56, 693-707.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-024-01560-2
[8]  Azabo, R., Dulle, F., Mshana, S.E., Matee, M. and Kimera, S. (2022) Antimicrobial Use in Cattle and Poultry Production on Occurrence of Multidrug Resistant Escherichia coli. A Systematic Review with Focus on Sub-Saharan Africa. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, Article ID: 1000457.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1000457

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133