全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Lazare Carnot’s Mechanics: The Beginning of Group Theory in Science

DOI: 10.4236/ahs.2026.153009, PP. 234-254

Keywords: Lazare Carnot, Group Theory

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Present paper quickly reviews the main characteristic features of Lazare Carnot’s formulation of mechanics according to the results of the research of the last four decades. Three basic features of its theoretical development are illustrated: 1) Its starting point as declared by Carnot himself, i.e. the principle of virtual works modified in a suitable version for the case of the impact of bodies; the theoretical treatment of this phenomenon avoids the use of the main basic notion of Newton’s theory of mechanics, i.e. the force-cause; 2) The recognition of two basic choices on two dichotomies concerning the entire theoretical physics; his choices are the alternatives ones to Newton’s; 3) The introduction of the group theory in theoretical physics; Carnot was proud to have given birth to “an intermediate science between geometry and mechanics”. The latter novelty is compared with i) René-Just Haüy’s introduction (occurred one year later) of symmetries into crystallography; ii) Evariste Galois’ introduction (occurred fifty years later) of group theory into mathematics; iii) Pierre Curie’s introduction (occurred a century later) of symmetry breaking into theoretical physics; iv) Albert Einstein’s 1905 paper introducing Lorenz group into mechanics. The open problems of a rational re-construction of L. Carnot’s formulation according to two alternative basic choices are suggested.

References

[1]  Bazhanov, V. A., & Drago, A. (1998). Towards a More Adequate Appraisal of Lobachevskii’s Scholarly Work. The Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi, 54, 125-139.
[2]  Bazhanov, V. A., & Drago, A. (2010). A Logical Analysis of Lobachevsky’s Geometrical Theory. The Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi, 64, 453-481.
[3]  Bellini, E., Drago, A., & Mauriello, G. (2007). Ricostruzione della meccanica di Lazare Carnot come alternativa fondazionale alla meccanica newtoniana. In M. Leone, B. Preziosi, & N. Robotti (Eds.), L’eredità di Fermi, Majorana ed altri temi. Alti del XXIV Congr. Soc. It. Storia Fisica e Astronomia (Avellino 2004) (pp. 113-121). Bibliopolis.
[4]  Bishop, E. (1967). Constructive Analysis. McGraw-Hill.
[5]  Boiano, L., & Drago, A. (2002). La geometria di Lazare Carnot: Rinascita e potenziamento del metodo sintetico. The Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi, 57, 97-122.
[6]  Boyer, C. (1991). A History of Mathematics. Wiley.
[7]  Capecchi, D. (2012). History of Virtual Work Laws: A History of Mechanics Prospective. Springer.
[8]  Capriglione, M., & Drago, A. (1998). La meccanica analitica di Lagrange: Confronto delle diverse versioni e valutazioni critiche. Giornale di Fisica, 39, 83-99.
[9]  Carnot, L. (1783). Essai sur les Machines en Général. Defay.
[10]  Carnot, L. (1803a). Principes fondamentaux de l’équilibre et du mouvement. Deterville.
[11]  Carnot, L. (1803b). Géométrie de Position. Duprat.
[12]  Carnot, L. (1813). Réflexions sur la Métaphysique du Calcul Infinitésimal. Courcier.
[13]  Carnot, L. (1971). Mémoire sur la Mécanique (1778 and 1780). In C. C. Gillispie (Ed.), Lazare Carnot Savant: A Monograph Treating Carnot’s Scientific Work (Appendices B and C, pp. 270-340). Princeton University Press.
[14]  Carnot, L. (1990). A la recherche de l’énergie. In J.-P. Charnay (Ed.), Lazare Carnot ou le savant-citoyen. Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.
[15]  Carnot, S. (1873). Note manuscrite de Sadi Carnot sur le Chevalier de Borda et sur la théorie de la chaleur. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, 76, 331-335.
[16]  Cauchy, A. L. (1830-1831). Sui metodi analitici. Biblioteca Italiana.
http://emeroteca.braidense.it/eva/indice_articoli.php?IDTestata=110&CodScheda=207&PageRec=25&PageSel=8&CodVolume=2480&CodFascicolo=16211
[17]  Cellucci, C. (2025). A Philosophy for the Future: Escaping from Irrelevance. Springer.
[18]  Curie, P. (1894). Sur la symétrie dans les phénomènes physiques, symétrie d’un champ électrique et d’un champ magnétique. Journal de Physique Théorique et Appliquée, 3, 393-415.
https://doi.org/10.1051/jphystap:018940030039300
[19]  D’Alembert, J. (1797). Elements. In J. D’Alembert, & D. D. Le Ronde (Eds.), Encyclopédie Fran?aise (pp. 501). Société de gestion de l’Encyclopédie fran?aise.
[20]  D’Avino, G., & Drago, A. (1983). La rifondazione della meccanica secondo Carnot. Confronto con l’analisi costruttiva. In P. Tucci (Ed.), Atti del IV Congresso nazionale di storia della fisica (pp. 128-133). CLUED.
[21]  Drago, A. (1986). Relevance of Constructive Mathematics to Theoretical Physics. In E. Agazzi (Ed.), Logica e Filosofia della Scienza, oggi (pp. 267-272). CLUEB.
[22]  Drago, A. (1989a). The Birth of Symmetries in Theoretical Physics: Lazare Carnot’s Mechanics. In O. Darvas, & D. Nagy (Eds.), Symmetry of Structure (pp. 98-101). The Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
[23]  Drago, A. (1989b). Dalla geometria alla formalizzazione logica: Lazare Carnot. In G. Corsi (Ed.), Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Storia della Logica: Le teorie delle modalità (pp. 313-318). CLUEB.
[24]  Drago, A. (1990a). Le lien entre mathématique et physique dans la mécanique de Lazare Carnot. In J. P. Charnay (Ed.), Lazare Carnot ou le savant-citoyen (pp. pp. 501-515). Press of Université Paris-Sorbonne.
[25]  Drago, A. (1993). The Principle of Virtual Works a Source of Two Traditions in 18th Century of Mechanics. In F. Bevilacqua (Ed.), History of Physics in Europe in 19th and 20th Century (pp. 69-80). SIF.
[26]  Drago, A. (1996). Alternative Mathematics and Alternative Theoretical Physics: The Method for Linking Them Together. Epistemologia, 19, 33-50.
https://philpapers.org/rec/DRAAMA-3
[27]  Drago, A. (2000). Il principio di d’Alembert non è un principio. Sua relazione con il principio dei lavori virtuali. In P. Tucci (Ed.), Atti del XIX Congresso Nazionale di Storia Della Fisica e dell’Astronomia (pp. 195-210). Istituto Fisica Univ. Milano.
[28]  Drago, A. (2002). The Introduction to Non-Euclidean Geometries by Bolyai through an Arguing of Non-Classical Logic. In 2002 Communication to an International Conference.
[29]  Drago, A. (2004). A New Appraisal of Old Formulations of Mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 72, 407-409.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1625924
[30]  Drago, A. (2011). The Birth of the Non-Euclidean Geometries as the More Significant Crisis in the Foundations of Modern Mathematics. Logic and Philosophy of Science, 11, 103-110.
[31]  Drago, A. (2012). The Ideal Model of a Problem-Oriented Theory. In Vasiliev’s Logical Investigations and the Image of Science: His Scientific Heritage (pp. 121-140).
[32]  Drago, A. (2014). Il modo di ragionare di Evariste Galois sulla risolubilità delle equazioni algebriche in radicali. Matematicamente, 188, 1-2.
[33]  Drago, A. (2017). Dalla Storia della Fisica alla Scoperta dei Fondamenti della Fisica (English Translation in “Antonino Drago Site”). Unpublished Works.
https://antoninodrago.com/doc/history-of-physics.pdf
[34]  Drago, A. (2022). The Other Side of the History of Symmetries. Their Link with Intuitionist Logic. In Proceedings of the SISFA 42nd Annual Conference (pp. 239-246). Pisa University Press.
https://doi.org/10.12871/978883339843332
[35]  Drago, A. (2024). A Study on Curie’s Paper and the Many Versions of “Curie’s Principle”. In M. Gargano, A. Gasperini, & S. Straulino (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th SISFA National Congress (pp. 163-172). Federico II University Press.
[36]  Drago, A. (2026). Sadi Carnot and the Birth of a Pluralist Science. In R. Pisano (Ed.), 200 Years Since Sadi Carnot’s Réflexions sur la puissance motrice du Feu, 1824-2024. Springer.
[37]  Drago, A., & Iacono, P. (2009). Il legame tra i due Carnot durante la nascita della teoria della termodinamica. Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi, 64, 679-693.
[38]  Drago, A., & Manno, D. (1986). La meccanica nel Settecento, un secolo di ambiguità e polemiche per la teoria meccanica. Giornale di Fisica, 27, 291-307.
[39]  Drago, A., & Manno, D. (1989). Le ipotesi fondamentali della meccanica secondo Lazare Carnot. Epistemologia, 12, 305-330.
[40]  Drago, A., & Manno, D. (1994). Translation and Critical Edition of Carnot L. Essai sur les machines en general. CUEN.
[41]  Dugas, R. (1950). Histoire de la Mécanique. Griffon.
[42]  Fraser, C. (1983). J. L. Lagrange’s Early Contributions to the Principles and Methods of Mechanics. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 28, 197-241.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00328268
[43]  Frisch, M. B. (2006). Quality of Life Therapy: Applying a Life Satisfaction Approach to Positive Psychology and Cognitive Therapy. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[44]  Galois, E. (1982). Ecrits et mémoires mathématiques. Gauthiers-Villars.
[45]  Gillispie, C. C. (1971). Lazare Carnot Savant. American Journal of Physics, 40, 214-214.
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1986491
[46]  Gillispie, C. C., & Pisano, R. (2013). Lazare and Sadi Carnot: A Scientific and Filial Relationship. Springer.
[47]  Grattan-Guinness, I. (1990). Convolutions in French Mathematics 1800-1840. Birkhauser, Basel.
[48]  Hankins, T. L. (1970). Jean d’Alembert: Science and the Enlightenment. Oxford University Press (Clarendon Press).
[49]  Hanson, N. R. (1965). The Tortoise Shoots Back. Philosophical Studies, 16, 14-16.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00398837
[50]  Haüy, R. J. (1784). Essais d’une théorie sur la structure des crystaux appliqué à plusieurs genres des substances crystallisées. Goguée et Née de la Rochelle.
[51]  Jouguet, E. (1908). Lectures de Mécanique. Gauthier-Villars.
[52]  Klein, F. (1890). Considerazioni comparative intorno a ricerche geometriche recenti. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 17, 307-343.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02420575
[53]  Kline, M. (1972). Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. Oxford University Press.
[54]  Lagrange, J. L. (1788). Méchanique Analitique. Desaint.
[55]  Lagrange, J. L. (1892). Oeuvres de Lagrange. Gauthier-Villars.
[56]  Leibniz, G. W. (1677). Letter to H. Fabri. In Leibnizens mathematische Schriften (pp. 1848-1863). Antigonos Verlag.
[57]  Leibniz, G. W. (1693). Essay de dynamique sur les lois du movement. Mathematische Schriften, 6, 215-222.
https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Leibniz_2e.Essai.de.Dynamique
[58]  Mach, E. (1893). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung historisch-kritisch dargestellt. Cambridge University Press.
[59]  Mascheroni, L. (1797). La Geometria del Compasso. Galeazzi.
[60]  Oliveira, A. R. E. (2014). A History of the Work Concept: From Physics to Economics. Springer.
[61]  Oliveira, A. R. E. (2025). Introduction to Epistemology of Mechanical Sciences. Springer.
[62]  Poinsot, L. (1975). La théorie de l’équilibre et du mouvement des systèmes. Vrin.
[63]  Reinhard, M. (1950). Le grand Carnot. Vol. 1: De l’ingénieur au conventionnel, 1753-1792. Hachette.
[64]  Reinhard, M. (1952). Le grand Carnot. Vol. 2: L’organisateur de la victoire, 1792-1823. Hachette.
[65]  Schubring, G. (2005). Conflicts between Generalization, Rigor and Intuition. Number Concepts Underlying the Development of Analysis in 17th-19th Century France and Germany. Springer.
[66]  Scott, W. L. (1970). The Conflict between Atomism and Conservation Theory, 1644-1860. Elsevier.
[67]  Truesdell, C. A. (1968). Whence the Law of Moment of Momentum? In Essays in the History of Mechanics (pp. 239-271). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86647-0_5
[68]  Weyl, H. (1952). Symmetry. Princeton University Press.
[69]  Youschkevitch, A. P. (1971). Lazare Carnot and the Competition of the Berlin Academy in 1786 on the Mathematical Theory of the Infinite. In C. C. Gillispie (Ed.), Lazare Carnot Savant: A Monograph Treating Carnot’s Scientific Work (pp. 149-168). Princeton University Press.
https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Carnot/

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133