全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Contribution of Composting and Surface Decomposition of Farm Waste to the Mitigation of CO2 and CH4 from Selected Farm Wastes in Masaka and Lyantonde Districts

DOI: 10.4236/ojap.2026.153007, PP. 117-128

Keywords: Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Smallholder Farmers, Composting, Surface Decomposition, Farm Wastes

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Agriculture in Uganda is the leading sector, employing over 85% of the entire population, with 68% of farmers struggling as smallholder farmers. Thus, agriculture is dominated by smallholder farmers. Available reports emphasize the contribution of the agricultural sector to greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). During the course of farming, smallholder farmers make many attempts to either benefit from the farm wastes generated or to get rid of them directly or indirectly. Thus, we realize some go for composting, which is intentional, while others opt for surface decomposition, which is seen as the default approach. Whatever option of waste management is chosen, there is efficacy for the method. The type of system waste component and waste management practice greatly contribute to GHG emissions, such as CO2 and CH4. The efficacy of each method varies considerably in terms of mitigating GHG emissions. This study considered farm wastes (bean trash, maize trash, banana trash, cattle slurry, goat slurry, and pig slurry) commonly produced by smallholder farmers in two farming systems of Masaka and Lyantonde Districts to: estimate the relative carbon dioxide and methane emissions of each selected farm waste component in different farming systems (arable and mixed, represented by Masaka and Lyantonde Districts, respectively), and estimate the relative carbon dioxide and methane emissions of selected aggregated farm waste. Using a gas analyzer F-950 (three-gas analyzer), we determined carbon dioxide and oxygen from airtight containers in which individual farm wastes/aggregated farm wastes were contained. Basing our calculations on the gas laws, we used a formula V 2 = P 1 V 1 P 2 to compute and obtain corresponding methane values. Results revealed that composting beans from the arable farming system captured the highest volume of 784.3 ppm of CO2 and 978.7 ppm of CH4 at 3000 cm?1. In the mixed farming system, pig slurry produced the highest volume of CH4 (556 ppm), while maize produced more CO2 volumes under composting (602 ppm). The mixed

References

[1]  Krause, A., Pugh, T.A.M., Bayer, A.D., Li, W., Leung, F., Bondeau, A., et al. (2018) Large Uncertainty in Carbon Uptake Potential of Land-Based Climate-Change Mitigation Efforts. Global Change Biology, 24, 3025-3038.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14144
[2]  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
[3]  Thompson, S. (2005) Modeling Waste Management Options for Greenhouse Gas Reduction. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 6, 16-24.
https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.200500051
[4]  Albiac, J., Kahil, T., Notivol, E. and Calvo, E. (2017) Agriculture and Climate Change: Potential for Mitigation in Spain. Science of the Total Environment, 592, 495-502.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.110
[5]  Khater, E.G. (2012) Chemical and Physical Properties of Compost. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 29, 1567-1582.
https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2012.101382
[6]  Zakariyah, S.S. (2013) Worked Examples on Gas Laws and Kinetic Theory.
https://www.academia.edu/4261190/Worked_Examples_on_Gas_Laws_and_Kinetic_Theory
[7]  Creswell, J.W. (2009) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications.
[8]  Almalki, S. (2016) Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data in Mixed Methods Research—Challenges and Benefits. Journal of Education and Learning, 5, 288-296.
https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p288
[9]  Rahman, M.M., Tabash, M.I., Salamzadeh, A., Abduli, S. and Rahaman, M.S. (2022) Sampling Techniques (Probability) for Quantitative Social Science Researchers: A Conceptual Guidelines with Examples. SEEU Review, 17, 42-51.
https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2022-0023
[10]  Vergara, S.E. and Silver, W.L. (2019) Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Windrow Composting of Organic Wastes: Patterns and Emissions Factors. Environmental Research Letters, 14, Article ID: 124027.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5262
[11]  Chaichana, N., Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D., Komiya, S., Fujii, Y., Noborio, K., Dietrich, O., et al. (2018) Comparison of Closed Chamber and Eddy Covariance Methods to Improve the Understanding of Methane Fluxes from Rice Paddy Fields in Japan. Atmosphere, 9, Article No. 356.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9090356
[12]  Sanz-Cobena, A., et al. (2017) Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation in Medi-Terranean Agriculture: A Review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 238, 5-24.
[13]  Friedrich, E. and Trois, C. (2011) Quantification of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste Management Processes for Municipalities—A Comparative Review Focusing on Africa. Waste Management, 31, 1585-1596.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.02.028
[14]  Andersen, J.K., Boldrin, A., Samuelsson, J., Christensen, T.H. and Scheutz, C. (2010) Quantification of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Windrow Composting of Garden Waste. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 713-724.
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0329
[15]  Snijders, P.J.M., Davies, O., Wouters, A.P., Gachimbi, L., Zake, J., Ergano, K., Abduke, M. and van Keulen, H. (2009) Cattle Manure Management in East Africa: Review of Manure Quality and Nutrient Losses and Scenarios for Cattle and Manure Management. Wageningen UR Livestock Research.
[16]  Bogner, J., Pipatti, R., Hashimoto, S., Diaz, C., Mareckova, K., Diaz, L., et al. (2008) Mitigation of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste: Conclusions and Strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation). Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 26, 11-32.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x07088433
[17]  Terefe, H. (2011) Crop Residue Management and Farm Productivity in Smallholder Crop-Livestock System of Dry Land North Wollo, Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis, Wageningen University.
[18]  Bünemann, E.K., Schwenke, G.D. and Van Zwieten, L. (2006) Impact of Agricultural Inputs on Soil Organisms—A Review. Soil Research, 44, 379-406.
https://doi.org/10.1071/sr05125
[19]  Mugisa, D.J., Katimbo, A., Sempiira, J.E. and Kisaalita, W.S. (2016) Anthropometric Characteristics of Female Smallholder Farmers of Uganda—Toward Design of Labor-Saving Tools. Applied Ergonomics, 54, 177-185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.010
[20]  Kinobe, J.R., Niwagaba, C.B., Gebresenbet, G., Komakech, A.J. and Vinner?s, B. (2015) Mapping out the Solid Waste Generation and Collection Models: The Case of Kampala City. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65, 197-205.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2014.984818

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133