全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Breakthrough Strategies for Vietnam’s Economic Development during the 2026-2030 Period

DOI: 10.4236/me.2026.178049, PP. 991-1010

Keywords: Economy, Economic Development, Breakthrough Development, Vietnam

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The Resolution of the 14th National Congress of the Party has set the goal of breakthrough development with an average GDP growth rate of 10% or more per year, GDP per capita reaching approximately 8500 USD by 2030, the digital economy accounting for about 30% of GDP, the manufacturing industry accounting for about 28% of GDP, and contributing over 55% to total factor productivity. To achieve this, the Resolution emphasizes three strategic breakthroughs: (1) Breakthrough in institutions, perfecting the socialist-oriented market economy institutions, removing bottlenecks, creating a transparent investment environment, and unlocking resources; (2) Breakthrough in high-quality human resources, reforming education and training, attracting talent and developing science and technology, innovation, and digital transformation as the main driving force; (3) Breakthrough in synchronous and modern infrastructure. Key priorities include innovating the growth model, restructuring the economy, developing the private and state-owned sectors as driving forces, promoting a green and circular economy, deep international integration, and ensuring macroeconomic stability. The decisive implementation of these solutions will lay the foundation for Vietnam to become a developing country with a modern industrial base and a high-middle-income status by 2030, aiming for high-income status by 2045.

References

[1]  Acemoglu, D. (2025). The Simple Macroeconomics of AI. Economic Policy, 40, 13-58.
https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiae042
[2]  Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Crown Business.
[3]  Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
[4]  Bon, N. V. (2019). Institutional Quality and the Public Investment-Growth Relationship in Vietnam. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9, 691-708.
https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2019.94046
[5]  Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam (2025a). Political Report of the 13th Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam at the 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam.
[6]  Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam (2025b). Report Summarizing Theoretical and Practical Issues on the Socialist-Oriented Reform Process in Vietnam over the Past 40 Years.
[7]  Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam (2025c). Five-Year Socio-Economic Development Strategy, 2026-2030.
[8]  Communist Party of Vietnam (2026). Resolution of the 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam.
[9]  GSO (2022). Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam 2021.
[10]  GSO (2023). Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam 2022.
[11]  GSO (2024). Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam 2023.
[12]  GSO (2025). Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam 2024.
[13]  GSO (2026). Report on the Socio-Economic Situation in the Fourth Quarter and the Year 2025.
[14]  Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83-116.
https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399555954
[15]  IMF (2024). World Economic Outlook: Steady but Slow: Resilience Amid Divergence.
https://www.imf.org/en/publications/weo/issues/2024/04/16/world-economic-outlook-april-2024
[16]  IMF (2025a). Vietnam: Boosting Productivity and Medium-Term Growth (IMF Country Report No. 25/284).
[17]  IMF (2025b). World Economic Outlook: A Critical Juncture Amid Policy Shifts.
https://www.imf.org/en/publications/weo/issues/2025/04/22/world-economic-outlook-april-2025
[18]  ITU (2024). Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures 2024.
[19]  Krugman, P. (1994). The Myth of Asia’s Miracle. Foreign Affairs, 73, 62-78.
https://doi.org/10.2307/20046929
[20]  Lin, J. Y. (2012). New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy. The World Bank.
https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8955-3
[21]  Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407-437.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477
[22]  McKinsey & Company (2023). The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier.
[23]  Minh, L. N., Tan, N. N., Toan, D. V., Thao, T. D., Huyen, N. T., & Hoài, N. T. (2024). Digital Transformation in Vietnam: A Case Study of Hanoi SMEs. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11, 207-215.
https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.04.022
[24]  Minh, N. H. (2020). Domestic Innovation Activities and Economic Development in Vietnam. Science & Technology Development Journal-Economics, Law and Management, 4, 1069-1080.
https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjelm.v4i4.629
[25]  Ngoc, N. T., & Anh, N. T. (2016). Green Economy Development in Vietnam and the Involvement of Enterprises. Low Carbon Economy, 7, 36-46.
https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2016.71004
[26]  OECD (2020). Multi-Dimensional Review of Viet Nam: Towards an Integrated, Transparent and Sustainable Economy. OECD Publishing.
[27]  OECD (2022). Government at a Glance: Southeast Asia 2022. OECD Publishing.
[28]  OECD (2024). OECD Economic Outlook (Vol. 2024, Issue 1).
https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-economic-outlook/volume-2024/issue-1_69a0c310-en.html
[29]  OECD (2025). OECD Economic Surveys: Viet Nam 2025.
https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-economic-surveys-viet-nam-2025_fb37254b-en.html
[30]  OECD, & ERIA (2018). SME Policy Index: ASEAN 2018. OECD Publishing.
[31]  Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press.
[32]  Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131-165.
https://doi.org/10.1023/b:joeg.0000031425.72248.85
[33]  Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.
https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
[34]  Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
[35]  Statista (2026). Vietnam: Statistics & Facts.
https://www.statista.com/topics/4598/vietnam/
[36]  Trong, N. P. (2022). Some Theoretical and Practical Issues on Socialism and the Path to Socialism in Vietnam. National Political Publishing House.
[37]  UNCTAD (2024a). Trade and Development Report 2024: Rethinking Development in the Age of Discontent.
https://unctad.org/publication/trade-and-development-report-2024
[38]  UNCTAD (2024b). World Investment Report 2024. United Nations.
[39]  UNEP (2011). Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication.
[40]  WEF (2025). Global Economic Futures: Competitiveness in 2030.
[41]  WIPO (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024.
[42]  World Bank (2014). Vietnam Development Report 2014: Skilling Up Vietnam.
[43]  World Bank (2022). Vietnam Country Climate and Development Report.
[44]  World Bank (2025a). Taking Stock, March 2025: Electrifying Journeys-E-Mobility Transition in Viet Nam.
[45]  World Bank (2025b). Taking Stock, September 2025: Viet Nam Economic Update.
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099133509042513941/pdf/IDU-0d5c6542-bd71-4685-afd7-f02b835bc36c.pdf
[46]  Young, A. (1995). The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 641-680.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2946695

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133