As rapidly urbanizing cities face increasing car dependency, traditional intersections often reach saturation, necessitating unconventional geometric interventions. This study evaluates the operational efficiency of an unsignalized Median U-Turn (MUT) configuration, specifically investigating the impact of imbalanced offset distances on a high-volume urban corridor in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The research evaluates a compact 120 m crossover representing the lower bound of AASHTO recommendations against a conventional imbalanced configuration featuring offsets of 864 m for the Northbound approach and 1.37 km for the Southbound approach. Utilizing PTV Vissim microscopic simulation under a peak demand of 2,415 veh/hr, the methodology analyzes movement-specific dynamics through a 600 second analysis interval scaled to hourly performance. Findings demonstrate that the unsignalized MUT configuration with an imbalanced 120 m offset provides satisfactory operational performance, achieving a system-wide average delay of only 11.11 seconds per vehicle (LOS A). Critically, despite the high Southbound demand of 1,119 veh/hr, the maximum observed queue of 26.63 m utilized only 22.2% of the available 120 m storage length. These results empirically suggest that extreme distances of 864 m and 1.37 km are operationally redundant for this corridor. Implementing the compact 120 m MUT design reduces the additional travel distance for U-turning vehicles by up to 2.4 km per trip by replacing the existing long crossover configuration. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed 120 m MUT operates efficiently under the observed traffic demand, providing evidence that a compact offset is operationally feasible while improving land-use efficiency without compromising operational stability.
Garber, N.J., Hoel, L.A. and Sarkar, R. (2009) Traffic and Highway Engineering. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.com/books?id=x8TaPEE0CZkC
[3]
(2010) HCM 2010: Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board. https://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/164718.aspx
[4]
El Esawey, M. and Sayed, T. (2013) Analysis of Unconventional Arterial Intersection Designs (UAIDs): State-of-the-Art Methodologies and Future Research Directions. TransportmetricaA: TransportScience, 9, 860-895. https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2012.672344
[5]
Ak?elik, R. and ARRB Transport Research (1981) Traffic Signals: Capacity and Timing Analysis. Research Report/ARRB.
[6]
Hughes, W., Jagannathan, R., Sengupta, D. and Hummer, J. (2010) Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR). United States. Federal Highway Administration. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/09060/
[7]
Reid, J.D. and Hummer, J.E. (1999) Analyzing System Travel Time in Arterial Corridors with Unconventional Designs Using Microscopic Simulation. TransportationResearchRecord: JournaloftheTransportationResearchBoard, 1678, 208-215. https://doi.org/10.3141/1678-25
[8]
Bared, J.G. and Kaisar, E.I. (2002) Median U-Turn Design as an Alternative Treatment for Left Turns at Signalized Intersections. United States. Federal Highway Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/41860
[9]
Rodegerdts, L.A. (2010) Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. Transportation Research Board. https://books.google.com/books?id=dk74hRZHTo4C&pg=PP1
[10]
Kimber, R.M. (1989) Gap-Acceptance and Empiricism in Capacity Prediction. TransportationScience, 23, 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.23.2.100
[11]
Litman, T. (2009) Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 9 p. https://vtpi.org/tca/
[12]
Al-Ghamdi, A.S. (2001) Analysis of Time Headways on Urban Roads: Case Study from Riyadh. JournalofTransportationEngineering, 127, 289-294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2001)127:4(289)
[13]
Hummer, J.E. and Mehrara Molan, A. (2022) Comparing the New Double Contraflow Intersection to Conventional and Alternative Intersections. JournalofTransportationEngineering, PartA: Systems, 148, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000642
[14]
Al-Omari, M.M.A. and Abdel-Aty, M. (2021) Evaluation of a New Intersection Design, “Shifting Movements”. TransportationResearchRecord: JournaloftheTransportationResearchBoard, 2675, 1352-1363. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211015990
[15]
Hu, S., Jia, Z., Yang, A., Xue, K. and He, G. (2022) Evaluating the Sustainable Traffic Flow Operational Features of U-Turn Design with Advance Left Turn. Sustainability, 14, Article 6931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116931