全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

From Fluency to Cultural Fluency: An AI-Era Reappraisal of Prior Research on Non-Native Business Communication

DOI: 10.4236/ti.2026.173015, PP. 248-294

Keywords: English as a Lingua Franca, Business Communication, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Machine Translation, Cultural Intelligence, Non-Native English Speakers, International Trade, Cross-Cultural Management

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This article critically reappraises three prior publications by the author concerning the use of English in negotiation and marketing, the evolution of business-English learning, and the exporting challenges experienced by non-Anglophone business owners. Interpreted alongside independent scholarship on business communication, cross-cultural competence, generative artificial intelligence (AI), and machine translation, these works are reconsidered in light of the rapid development of AI-mediated multilingual communication since 2023. The reappraisal identifies linguistic, cultural, psychological, and situational barriers that interact in shaping the experiences and outcomes of non-native business communicators. It then develops a two-layer model of communicative competence. The surface layer comprises vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation, spelling, and literal comprehension—capabilities that generative AI and machine translation can increasingly support at low cost, most reliably in routine business registers and in high-resource language pairs involving English, and that such support raises in performance without necessarily developing in the communicator. The deep layer, termed cultural fluency, is specified as three antecedent capabilities—cultural intelligence, pragmatic competence, and relational competence—whose joint exercise produces counterpart-rated trust as an outcome rather than as a fourth component. Whether the deep layer remains human-led is treated as contingent on the present reliability of automated systems, on the location of accountability, and on the relational context of communication rather than as a permanent boundary. On this basis, the article advances five testable propositions: that AI will commoditize surface competence; shift competitive value toward cultural fluency; restructure rather than eliminate the English-language premium; increase the relative value of developed bilingual and bicultural competence in culturally demanding tasks; and potentially reinforce the structural dominance of English through inequalities in language-technology performance. A practical framework is also proposed for allocating communicative tasks across automation, human-AI collaboration, and human control according to task layer, consequences of error, and relational stakes. The article concludes that generative AI is unlikely to eliminate the importance of English competence but may transform what that competence means and where its strategic value resides.

References

[1]  Aichhorn, N., & Puck, J. (2017). “I Just Don’t Feel Comfortable Speaking English”: Foreign Language Anxiety as a Catalyst for Spoken-Language Barriers in MNCs. International Business Review, 26, 749-763.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.01.004
[2]  Albl-Mikasa, M., Ehrensberger-Dow, M., Gieshoff, A. C., & Hunziker Heeb, A. (2024). English as a Lingua Franca in Interpreting and Translation: A Survey of Practitioners. Frontiers in Communication, 9, Article ID: 1413110.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1413110
[3]  Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press.
[4]  Blasi, D., Anastasopoulos, A., & Neubig, G. (2022). Systematic Inequalities in Language Technology Performance across the World’s Languages. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 5486-5505). Association for Computational Linguistics.
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.376
[5]  Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1
[6]  Dehghanzadeh, H., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., Talaee, E., & Noroozi, O. (2021). Using Gamification to Support Learning English as a Second Language: A Systematic Review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34, 934-957.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298
[7]  Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions Across Cultures. Stanford University Press.
[8]  Frey, C. B., & Llanos-Paredes, P. (2025). Lost in Translation: Artificial Intelligence and the Demand for Foreign Language Skills.
https://oms-www.files.svdcdn.com/production/downloads/academic/Frey_LlanosParedes_2025_LostInTranslation.pdf
[9]  Hendy, A., Abdelrehim, M., Sharaf, A., Raunak, V., Gabr, M., Matsushita, H., Kim, Y. J., Afify, M., & Awadalla, H. H. (2023). How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.09210
[10]  Hill, J. R., Song, L., & West, R. E. (2009). Social Learning Theory and Web-Based Learning Environments: A Review of Research and Discussion of Implications. American Journal of Distance Education, 23, 88-103.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640902857713
[11]  Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
[12]  Hymes, D. H. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings (pp. 269-293). Penguin Book.
[13]  Jiao, W., Wang, W., Huang, J., Wang, X., Shi, S., & Tu, Z. (2023). Is ChatGPT a Good Translator? Yes with GPT-4 as the Engine.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08745
[14]  Jiménez-Mu?oz, A. (2019). Beyond Language: A Multimodal Analysis of Success in Non-Native Business-English Pitches. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja), 37, 65-86.
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6967490.pdf
[15]  Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive Load Theory: Implications of Cognitive Load Theory on the Design of Learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00014-7
[16]  Klímová, B. (2018). Mobile Phones and/or Smartphones and Their Apps for Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1091-1099.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9655-5
[17]  Krizanova, A., L?z?roiu, G., Gajanova, L., Kliestikova, J., Nadanyiova, M., & Moravcikova, D. (2019). The Effectiveness of Marketing Communication and Importance of Its Evaluation in an Online Environment. Sustainability, 11, Article No. 7016.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247016
[18]  Li, Y., Teng, W., Tsai, L., & Lin, T. M. Y. (2022). Does English Proficiency Support the Economic Development of Non-English-Speaking Countries? the Case of Asia. International Journal of Educational Development, 92, Article ID: 102623.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102623
[19]  L?nsmann, D. (2017). Embrace It or Resist It? Employees’ Reception of Corporate Language Policies. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 17, 101-123.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595817694658
[20]  Louhiala-Salminen, L., Charles, M., & Kankaanranta, A. (2005). English as a Lingua Franca in Nordic Corporate Mergers: Two Case Companies. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 401-421.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.003
[21]  McKinsey and Company (2025). The State of AI: How Organizations Are Rewiring to Capture Value. QuantumBlack.
https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-how-organizations-are-rewiring-to-capture-value
[22]  McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith—A Failure of Analysis. Human Relations, 55, 89-118.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702551004
[23]  Neeley, T. (2012). Global Business Speaks English. Harvard Business Review, 90, 116-124.
https://hbr.org/2012/05/global-business-speaks-english
[24]  Ouanhlee, T. (2023). Effect on Non-Native English Speakers of Utilizing English for Business. International Business Research, 16, 16-35.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v16n9p16
[25]  Ouanhlee, T. (2023b). The Evolution of Learning English for Business. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
[26]  Ouanhlee, T. (2024). The Challenges of Exporting to English-Speaking Countries: Experiences from Non-Anglophone Business Owners. International Business Research, 17, 86-115.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v17n5p86
[27]  Rana, M. S., & Shaikh, R. (2024). The Role of English Speaking-Skills in Career Progression: A Case Study among Sudanese Undergraduate EFL Students. World Journal of English Language, 14, 349-357.
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n2p349
[28]  Rao, M. J. (2024). The Quest for Fluency: English Language Challenges for Non-Native Learners. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 9, 469-472.
https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.93.59
[29]  Rao, P. S. (2019). The Role of English as a Global Language. Research Journal of English, 4, 65-79.
https://scientificbulletin.com/index.php/IJIDSR/article/view/292
[30]  Reddy, R. V., Sriya, V. V. S. G. S., Rao, V., Usha, K. U., Bhardhwaj, Y., & Reddy, V. (2023). Significance of a Foreign Language in the Business World. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5, Article No. 2336.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i02.2336
[31]  Roshid, M. M. (2018). English, Empowerment and Economic Development: A Study in an International Business. In R. Chowdhury, M. Sarkar, F. Mojumder, & M. M. Roshid (Eds.), Engaging in Educational Research: Revisiting Policy and Practice in Bangladesh (pp. 315-331). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0708-9_17
[32]  Schorr, R., Voigt, M., & Rose, L. (2019). On Teaching Intercultural Competencies Using Ethnography and Cultural Dimension Theory. In 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 314-321). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/educon.2019.8725156
[33]  Seamless Communication Team, Barrault, L., Chung, Y.-A., Meglioli, M. C., Dale, D., Dong, N., Duquenne, P.-A. et al. (2023). SeamlessM4T: Massively Multilingual & Multimodal Machine Translation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11596
[34]  Si, J. (2020). An Analysis of Business English Coursebooks from an ELF Perspective. ELT Journal, 74, 156-165.
https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz049
[35]  Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
[36]  Spolsky, B., & Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75, Article No. 499.
https://doi.org/10.2307/329499
[37]  Stephens, R., Dong, L., & Soares, A. M. (2020). Leveraging Language Proficiency through Cultural Intelligence to Improve Global Virtual Team Performance. Journal of Business Disciplines, 1, 91-101.
https://doi.org/10.35255/jbd1871.101001
[38]  Takino, M. (2020). Power in International Business Communication and Linguistic Competence: Analyzing the Experiences of Nonnative Business People Who Use English as a Business Lingua Franca (BELF). International Journal of Business Communication, 57, 517-544.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417714222
[39]  Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
[40]  van Merri?nboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147-177.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
[41]  Yee Siu, B. W., & Afzaal, M. (2022). Non-Native English-Speaking Engineers’ Writing at the Workplace. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 40, 511-513.
https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2022.2049328
[42]  Zhang, Y. B., & Giles, H. (2017). Communication Accommodation Theory. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 1-14). John Wiley & Sons.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133