Integrating Cognitive Dissonance Theory into the “Teacher-Student-AI” Triadic Cognitive Interaction Model-Based on College English Reading and Writing Courses
Against digital transformation in higher education, the traditional teacher-student binary mode fails to meet personalized college English reading and writing needs. The “Teacher-Student-AI” Triadic Cognitive Interaction Model integrates generative artificial intelligence tools into daily classroom instruction, balances standardized group teaching and individual guidance, emerging as mainstream intelligent foreign language teaching direction. Nevertheless, the current triadic interaction frameworks only optimize external teaching procedures but ignore learners’ internal cognition, resulting in superficial class communication and students’ long-term over-reliance on instant feedback generated by AI platforms. Few scholars take Festinger’s Cognitive Dissonance Theory as the core analytical tool to build targeted triadic frameworks for EFL reading and writing. This paper systematically sorts out and evaluates domestic and international literature reviews relevant domestic and foreign literature, analyzes shallow interaction’s psychological roots via Cognitive Dissonance Theory, and constructs an optimized interdisciplinary triadic model with practical teaching strategies. Its research enriches intelligent foreign language education theories and provides systematic references for college English curriculum design and reform.
References
[1]
Zhang, Y. and Ouyang, Z. (2026) Symbiotic Triadic Cognitive Interaction Model Construction for College English Intelligent Teaching. Journal of Modern Foreign Languages, 49, 134-141. (In Chinese)
[2]
Men, L. (2025) Pre-Class, In-Class and After-Class Interactive Procedures Design for Teacher-Student-AI Triadic College English Classrooms. Vocational University Education Research, 11, 45-52. (In Chinese)
[3]
Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice‑Hall.
[4]
Wu, F.T. and Gao, S.R. (2026) Paradigm Shift of Classroom Teaching in the Intelligent Era: Structure and Pattern of Human‑AI Integration. E‑Education Research, 47, 75‑83. (In Chinese)
[5]
Obermüller, L., Klein, J. and Hartmann, F. (2024) Design Principles for AI-Enhanced Classroom Activities in Foreign Language Teaching. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 132456.
[6]
Guo, Y. and Liu, H. (2025) Research Status and Shortcomings of Teacher-Student-AI Triadic Interactive Teaching in College English Classrooms. Foreign Language World, 2, 36-43. (In Chinese)
[7]
Chu, L.M. (2025) Application and Dilemma of Generative AI in College English Reading and Writing Teaching. Journal of College English Teaching, 18, 78-84. (In Chinese)
[8]
Zhao, S. (2026) Efficiency Optimization and Risk Prevention of AI-Assisted College English Writing Correction. Journal of Educational Informatization, 15, 39-45. (In Chinese)
[9]
Huang, X. and Guo, Q. (2024) Students’ AI Dependence Behavior and Psychological Causes in Intelligent English Writing Teaching. Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Education, 6, 22-29. (In Chinese)
[10]
Klitgård, I. (2025) Navigating the Crossroads of GAI and Academic English Writing. Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 17, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7146/lom.v17i31.147660
[11]
Seran, C.E., Tan, M.J.T., Abdul Karim, H. and AlDahoul, N. (2025) A Conceptual Exploration of Generative Ai-Induced Cognitive Dissonance and Its Emergence in University-Level Academic Writing. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 1573368. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1573368
[12]
Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
[13]
Liu, J. (2016) Application of Cognitive Dissonance Theory in Middle School English Teaching Motivation Research. English Teachers, 16, 112-115. (In Chinese)
[14]
Han, Z. M. and Zhang, X. (2025) Compound Brain Inspiration of Human-Machine Collaboration: A New Model of Physiological-Psychological-Behavioral Coupling of Learners under the Situation of Group Cognitive Dissonance. E-Education Research, 46, 30-39. (In Chinese)
[15]
Wang, P. (2024) Internal Cognitive Mechanism of College English Reading and Writing Deep Learning. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 56, 245-253. (In Chinese)
[16]
Zhang, H. (2025) Teachers’ Cognitive Deviation and Optimization Strategies in Intelligent English Teaching. Vocational and Higher Education Research, 9, 88-94. (In Chinese)
[17]
Liu, Y. and Chen, L. (2025) Personalized Cognitive Guidance of AI-Assisted College English Reading and Writing Teaching. Higher Education Exploration, 7, 102-108. (In Chinese)
[18]
Wang, Q. and Li, J. (2025) Theoretical Application Gaps of Social Psychology in Intelligent Foreign Language Teaching Reform. Educational Review, 4, 67-74. (In Chinese)
[19]
Li, M. (2025) Cognitive Dissonance Regulation and Deep Learning of College English Learners. Journal of Psychological Science in Education, 12, 91-97. (In Chinese)