全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Surgical Approach to Decrease the Incidence of Negative Dysphotopsia after Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation

DOI: 10.4236/ojoph.2026.163024, PP. 279-287

Keywords: Cataract Surgery, Optic-Haptic Junction, Surgical Incision, Pseudophakia, Negative Dysphotopsia

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of two surgical approaches—differing in incision site, operating surgeon, surgical center, and optic-haptic junction orientation—on the incidence of negative dysphotopsia (ND) after cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Patients and Methods: This prospective comparative study included 102 patients who underwent cataract surgery with IOL implantation, divided into two equal groups (51 patients each). Group 1 received a supratemporal incision with a vertical optic-haptic junction. Group 2 received a superior incision with an inferotemporal optic-haptic junction. Both groups received monofocal acrylic IOLs (RayOne and Alcon AcrySof IQ). The primary endpoint was ND incidence, defined as patient-reported dark shadows or curtains in the temporal visual field, assessed on postoperative day 1 (in-person), day 3 (phone call), and week 4 (phone call) using the question: “Do you experience dark, temporal arcing shadows or curtains in your vision?” Demographic characteristics, surgical parameters, and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analysed. Results: The overall ND incidence was 2.9% (3/102 patients): 3.9% (2/51) in Group 1 and 2.0% (1/51) in Group 2, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.558). Among patients with ND, 66.7% (2/3) had a vertical optic-haptic junction and 33.3% (1/3) had an inferotemporal junction (p = 0.558). Symptoms worsened in bright light and improved in dim lighting in 50.0% of Group 1 patients and 100% of Group 2 patients with ND. The single affected Group 2 patient reported symptom improvement by week 4; no Group 1 patients did. Conclusion: The incidence of ND was low (2.9%). No statistically significant difference was detected between the two surgical approaches. Furthermore, only three ND events were documented, statistically reliable comparisons between groups cannot be established, Also, the underlying pathophysiology of ND is likely multifactorial with different variables that extend beyond the scope of the parameters examined in the present study.

References

[1]  Shambhu, S., Shanmuganathan, V.A. and Charles, S.J. (2005) The Effect of Lens Design on Dysphotopsia in Different Acrylic IOLs. Eye, 19, 567-570.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701568
[2]  Holladay, J.T., Lang, A. and Portney, V. (1999) Analysis of Edge Glare Phenomena in Intraocular Lens Edge Designs. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 25, 748-752.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00038-3
[3]  Osher, R.H. (2008) Negative Dysphotopsia: Long-Term Study and Possible Explanation for Transient Symptoms. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 34, 1699-1707.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.026
[4]  Davison, J.A. (2000) Positive and Negative Dysphotopsia in Patients with Acrylic Intraocular Lenses. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 26, 1346-1355.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00611-8
[5]  Mamalis, N. (2010) Negative Dysphotopsia Following Cataract Surgery. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 36, 371-372.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.001
[6]  Henderson, B.A., Yi, D.H., Constantine, J.B. and Geneva, I.I. (2016) New Preventative Approach for Negative Dysphotopsia. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 42, 1449-1455.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.020
[7]  Holladay, J.T., Zhao, H. and Reisin, C.R. (2012) Negative Dysphotopsia: The Enigmatic Penumbra. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 38, 1251-1265.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.01.032
[8]  Henderson, B.A. and Geneva, I.I. (2015) Negative Dysphotopsia: A Perfect Storm. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 41, 2291-2312.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.09.002
[9]  Cooke, D.L. (2010) Negative Dysphotopsia after Temporal Corneal Incisions. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 36, 671-672.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.004
[10]  Masket, S., Fram, N.R., Cho, A., Park, I. and Pham, D. (2018) Surgical Management of Negative Dysphotopsia. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 44, 6-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.10.038
[11]  Safran, S.G. (2017) Negative Dysphotopsia: A Persistent Problem. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 43, 300-301.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.018
[12]  Pamulapati, S.V., Saeed, J.M., Pompey, N., Gomez, K.D. and Vakharia, M.R. (2022) Randomized Controlled Trial of Intraocular Lens Orientation for Dysphotopsia. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 243, 28-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.06.018
[13]  Pusnik, A., Petrovski, G. and Lumi, X. (2022) Dysphotopsias or Unwanted Visual Phenomena after Cataract Surgery. Life, 13, Article No. 53.
https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010053
[14]  Stodola, E. (2021) Negative Dysphotopsia: How to Explain It and Management Strategies. EyeWorld.
https://www.eyeworld.org/2021/negative-dysphotopsia-how-to-explain-it-and-management-strategies/

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133