全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Answers to Frequently Asked Questions on Development Evaluation

DOI: 10.4236/me.2026.177045, PP. 869-908

Keywords: Development Evaluation, Independent Evaluation, Evaluation Methods and Approaches, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Quality Assurance, Evaluation Use

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper provides answers to frequently asked questions on development evaluation. Drawing on selected literature and the author’s experience in independent development evaluation at the African Development Bank, it presents key concepts, principles, and practices that underpin the discipline. The paper discusses the definition and purpose of evaluation, its distinction from related disciplines, the respective roles of self-evaluation and independent evaluation, the main types of evaluation, evaluation processes, methods used to generate credible evidence, mechanisms for quality assurance, and the use of evaluation findings to support learning and accountability. It is intended as a practical reference for evaluators, development practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders interested in understanding and applying evaluation in development contexts. As the paper reflects evaluation practice up to 2020, it does not address more recent developments, including the use of artificial intelligence in evaluation, the methodological adaptations prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic, or the recent implications of evolving international development aid policies.

References

[1]  Bamberger, M., & Segone, M. (2011). How to Design and Manage Equity?Focused Evaluations. New York: UNICEF Evaluation Office.
http://mymande.org/sites/default/files/EWP5_Equity_focused_evaluations.pdf
[2]  Burt, P. (2006). Moving from Outputs to Outcomes: Practical Advice from Governments Around the World. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government & The World Bank. January.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220121012248/
https://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/PerrinReport.pdf
[3]  Cook, T. (2025). Getting Back to “What Works”? Débats de l’IEEP n° 9, 4-7.
https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-04926448v1
[4]  Dart, J. (2004). Six Normative Approaches to Evaluation.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Six-Normative-Approaches-to-Evaluation-Dart/9d4b9bae005200bb6df0f3519c8bedeca533fea9
[5]  Davidson, E. D. (2005). Evaluation Methodology Basics: The Nuts and Bolts of Sound Evaluation. Sage.
[6]  ECG (2010). Good Practice Standards on Independence of International Finance Institutions’ Central Evaluation Departments.
https://www.ecgnet.org/document/gps-independence-international-financial-institutions-central-evaluation-departments
[7]  ECG (2012). Big Book on Evaluation Good Practice Standards. December.
https://www.ecgnet.org/sites/default/files/FINAL%20Big%20Book%20on%20GPS.pdf
[8]  Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theory of Change and Logic Models. Jossey-Bass.
[9]  Gakusi, A.-E., Negre, A., Diomanade, M. et al. (2018). Statistical and Qualitative Assessment of the Design Quality, Performance, Effectiveness and Sustainability of the Assistance of the African Development Bank to Microfinance, 2000-2012. The African Statistical Journal, 20, 14-55.
[10]  Herson, M., & Mitchell, J. (2005). Real-Time Evaluation: Where Does Its Value Lie? Humanitarian Exchange, No. 32, 43-45.
http://odihpn.org/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/humanitarianexchange032.pdf
[11]  IDEV (2013). African Development Bank Independent Evaluation Strategy 2013-2019. African Development Bank.
https://idev.afdb.org/en/document/african-development-bank-independent-evaluation-strategy-2013-2019
[12]  IDEV (2015). Work Program 2016-2018. African Development Bank.
https://idev.afdb.org/sites/default/files/documents/files/IDEV%20Work%20Program%202016_2018%20EN%20Web%20final.pdf
[13]  IDEV (2016a). Revised Independent Evaluation Policy (Revised Version 4). African Development Bank.
https://idev.afdb.org/sites/default/files/Evaluations/2020-06/Revised%20AfDB%20Evaluation%20Policy%20EN.pdf
[14]  IDEV (2016b). Comprehensive Evaluation of the Development Results of the African Development Bank Group 2004-2013, Synthesis Report. African Development Bank.
https://idev.afdb.org/sites/default/files/Evaluations/2020-03/IDEV%2C%20CEDR%20Report%20EN_web.pdf
[15]  IDEV (2019). Independent Evaluation Policy, Amended in July. African Development Bank.
https://www.ecgnet.org/sites/default/files/Revised%20AfDB%20Evaluation%20Policy%20EN.pdf
[16]  IDEV (2020). Steps and Instructions for Completing an Evaluation. African Development Bank.
[17]  IEG (2010). Cost-Benefit Analysis in World Bank Projects. Washington DC: The World Bank.
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/2561/624700PUB0Cost00Box0361484B0PUBLIC0.pdf?sequence=1
[18]  Mayne, J. (2015). Useful Theory of Change Models. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30, 119-142.
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.230
[19]  Morra-Imas, L. G., & Rist, R. C. (2009). The Road to Results: Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations. The World Bank.
https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7891-5
[20]  Naeem, M., Smith, T., & Thomas, L. (2025). Thematic Analysis and Artificial Intelligence: A Step-By-Step Process for Using ChatGPT in Thematic Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251333886
[21]  OECD (2002). Policy Coherence for Development. In Development Co-Operation Report 2001: Efforts and Policies of the Members of the Development Assistance Committee, Chapter 2 (pp. 23-53). OECD Publishing.
[22]  OECD (2005). Policy Coherence for Development: Promoting Institutional Good Practice. OECD Publishing.
[23]  OECD (2015). Better Policies for Development 2015: Policy Coherence and Green Growth. OECD Publishing.
[24]  OECD (2018). Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development 2018: Towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies. OECD Publishing.
[25]  OECD (2021). Applying Evaluation Criteria Thoughtfully. OECD Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1787/543e84ed-en
[26]  OECD (2023a). Driving Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development: Accelerating Progress on the SDGs. OECD Publishing.
[27]  OECD (2023b). Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management for Sustainable Development (2nd ed.). OECD Publishing.
[28]  OECD/DAC (1991). Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance, Paris.
http://www.oecd.org/development/evaluation/50584880.pdf
[29]  OECD/DAC (2010a). Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management, Paris.
http://www.oecd.org/development/peer-reviews/2754804.pdf
[30]  OECD/DAC (2010b). Quality Standards for Development Evaluation, Paris.
http://www.oecd.org/development/evaluation/qualitystandards.pdf
[31]  OECD/DAC (2019). Better Criteria for Better Evaluation: Revised Evaluation Criteria Definitions and Principles for Use.
https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/revised-evaluation-criteria-dec-2019.pdf
[32]  Patton, M. (2008a). State of the Art in Measuring Development Assistance.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268337535_State_of_the_Art_in_Measuring_Development_Assistance
[33]  Patton, M. (2008b). Utilization Focused Evaluation (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
[34]  Patton, M. (2010). Developmental Evaluation Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. Guilford Press.
[35]  Picciotto, R. (2004). Policy Coherence and Development Evaluation: Concepts, Issues and Possible Approaches. The OECD Workshop on Policy Coherence and Development.
[36]  Rogers, J. P. (2014). Theory of Change. UNCEF Methodological Briefs.
https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/brief_2_theoryofchange_eng.pdf
[37]  Sanders, J. R. (1997). Cluster Evaluation. In E. Chelimsky, & W. R. Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st Century. Sage.
[38]  Schwandt, T. A. (2015). Evaluation Foundations Revisited: Cultivating a Life of the Mind for Practice. Stanford University Press.
[39]  Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
[40]  Scriven, M. (2004). Michael Scriven on the Difference between Evaluation and Social Science Research. The Evaluation Exchange, Winter 2003/2004.
[41]  Shadish, W. (1998). Some Evaluation Questions. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6, No. 3.
https://doi.org/10.7275/1434-s056
[42]  Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation Models: New Direction of Evaluation. No. 89, 7-98.
https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.psu.edu/dist/7/144284/files/2021/12/3-Stufflebeam_Evaluation_Models.pdf?utm_source=copilot.com
[43]  UK Evaluation Society (2025). AI in Evaluation: Good Practice Guidelines for Practitioners.
https://evaluation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/UK-Evaluation-Society-AI-in-Evaluation-Good-Practice-Guidelines-for-Practitioners-V-2.0-1125.pdf
[44]  UNICEF (2024). An Operational Framework for Machine Learning in Evaluation.
https://www.unicef.org/evaluation/media/5606/file/ML%20Operational%20Framework%20FINAL.pdf.pdf
[45]  United States Department of the Treasury (2014). Evaluation Standards and Practices at the Multilateral Development Banks, a Report to Congress.
https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/international/development-banks/Documents/2015-03-01%20(Evaluation%20Report).pdf
[46]  Weiss, C. H. (1995). “Nothing as Practical as Good Theory: Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families”. In J. I. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, Concepts, Methods and Context. Aspen Institute.
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED383817.pdf
[47]  Weiss, C. H. (1997). Theory-Based Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future. New Directions for Evaluation, 1997, 41-55.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1086
[48]  Wood, B. et al. (2011). The Evaluation of Paris Declaration. Final Report.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/197482/evaluation-paris-declaration.pdf

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133