The interactive effects of API gravity and storage geometry on the volume retention of selected polar and nonpolar organic liquids (ethanol, methanol, low-molecular-weight crude oil [LCO], and natural gas liquids [NGL]) were investigated in this study over 7 days of evaporative storage. The storage systems used for monitoring the process were shaped into five different geometries (horizontally cylindrical, vertically cylindrical, cuboidal, spherical, and conical), and the liquids used in this study were characterized by API gravity, dipole moment, standard enthalpy of vaporization, vapor pressure, and interfacial evaporation descriptors. The results showed that liquid retention was governed by a competitive interplay among volatility, cohesive intermolecular attraction, gas-phase mass transfer, and vessel geometry. The consistent poor retention of NGL was attributed to its high API gravity, low effective cohesive energy, and very high vapor pressure. At the same time, ethanol and LCO exhibited the highest retention due to their lower volatility and greater resistance to evaporation. The polar compounds showed that ethanol retained more volume than methanol. However, both compounds have a close range of API gravities and dipole moments, indicating that the enthalpy of vaporization and vapor pressure were more decisive than polarity alone. The role of geometry was enormous as the conical vessel had the highest cumulative retention, while the spherical vessel had the least. Therefore, short-term storage losses are controlled not by API gravity alone, but by the combined effects of thermodynamic properties and storage geometry, with clear implications for reducing evaporation losses and for storage design in the process industries.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) Table Definitions, Sources, and Explanatory Notes: Petroleum Refining & Processing-Qualities of Crude Oil Input. https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/tbldefs/pet_pnp_crq_tbldef2.asp
[3]
McGrattan, K.B., Hostikka, S., Floyd, J.E., Baum, H.R. and Rehm, R.G. (2007) Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5): Technical Reference Guide (NIST Special Publication 1018-5). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[4]
Persad, A.H. and Ward, C.A. (2016) Expressions for the Evaporation and Condensation Coefficients in the Hertz-Knudsen Relation. Chemical Reviews, 116, 7727-7767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00511
[5]
Aragón, H. and Mata-Segreda, J.F. (2023) Evaporation Kinetics of Liquid Mixtures and Safe Handling. ACS Chemical Health & Safety, 30, 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.2c00070
[6]
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (2025) Raoult’s Law. In: IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 5th Edition. https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/15349
[7]
Jorge, M., Nunes, R., Grilo, I.A., Cordeiro, M.N.D.S. and Lopes, J.N.C. (2022) The Dipole Moment of Alcohols in the Liquid Phase and in Solution. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 361, Article 119636.
[8]
Shishkova, I., Stratiev, D., Kolev, I.V., Nenov, S., Nedanovski, D., Atanassov, K., et al. (2022) Challenges in Petroleum Characterization—A Review. Energies, 15, Article 7765. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207765
[9]
Spange, S. (2024) Polarity of Organic Solvent/Water Mixtures Measured with Reichardt’s B30 and Related Solvatochromic Probes—A Critical Review. Liquids, 4, 191-230. https://doi.org/10.3390/liquids4010010
[10]
Waghorne, W.E. (2024) Solvent Polarity/Polarizability Parameters: A Study of Catalan’s SPPN, Using Computationally Derived Molecular Properties, and Comparison with Π and Et(30). Liquids, 4, 163-170. https://doi.org/10.3390/liquids4010008
[11]
Zhang, C., Sun, H., Fu, P., Hu, Y., Huang, X. and Zhao, D. (2026) A Systematic Literature Review on the Evaporation Loss Mechanisms and Local Diffusion Characteristics of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from Petrochemical Storage Tanks. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 99, Article 105801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105801
[12]
Huang, W., Wang, S., Jing, H., Wang, C., Sun, X., Zhou, N., et al. (2020) A Calculation Method for Simulation and Evaluation of Oil Vapor Diffusion and Breathing Loss in a Dome Roof Tank Subjected to the Solar Radiation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 195, Article 107568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107568
[13]
Poós, T. and Varju, E. (2024) Review for Convection Based Evaporation of Open Liquid Surface and Equations of Evaporation Rate. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 157, Article 107755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2024.107755
[14]
Wijnhorst, R., Van der Sloot, F., Pel, L. and Shahidzadeh, N. (2024) Effect of Evaporative Surface Area on Salt Efflorescence and Subflorescence Formation in a Given Porous Material. Physical Review Applied, 21, Article No. 064055. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.21.064055
[15]
Kumar, L. and Sleiti, A.K. (2024) Modeling and Analysis of Effect of Various Tank Geometries and Relief Pressure on Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) Boil-Off Losses. Energy Proceedings, 44, Article 11076.
[16]
ASTM International (2024) Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density, or API Gravity of Crude Petroleum and Liquid Petroleum Products by Hydrometer Method (ASTM D1298-24). ASTM International.
[17]
Okwudili, O.J., Osuji, L.C., Ekpo, I. and Upua, P.U. (2025) Removal of Heavy Metals from Spent Automobile Engine Oil Using Oil Palm Biomass. Journal of Applied Chemical Science International, 16, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.56557/jacsi/2025/v16i19157
[18]
？egatin, N., Pajk ？ontar, T. and Poklar Ulrih, N. (2020) Dielectric Properties and Dipole Moment of Edible Oils Subjected to ‘Frying’ Thermal Treatment. Foods, 9, Article 900. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9070900
[19]
Kremer, F. and Tress, M. (2025) Dielectric Spectroscopy: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Applied Sciences, 15, Article 6954. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15136954
[20]
American Petroleum Institute (2021) Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards (MPMS), Chapter 3.1A: Standard Practice for the Manual Gauging of Petroleum and Petroleum Products (Consolidated Version of 3rd Edition, Incorporating Errata 1).
[21]
Autodesk (2024) What’s New in AutoCAD 2024. Autodesk Help.
[22]
García-G, D., Barco-Burgos, J., Chaparro, J., Eicker, U., Cárdenas D.R, J. and Salda？a-Robles, A. (2024) Analyzing Joint Efficiency in Storage Tanks: A Comparative Study of API 650 Standard and API 579 Using Finite Element Analysis for Enhanced Reliability. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 207, Article 105113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.105113
[23]
ASTM International (2021) ASTM E542-01(2021): Standard Practice for Calibration of Laboratory Volumetric Apparatus. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0542-01R21
[24]
American Petroleum Institute (2016) Petroleum Measurement Standards: Chapter 19, Evaporation Loss Measurement (Catalog Listing). API Publications Catalog. https://www.api.org/~/media/files/publications/2018_catalog/2018_pubs_catalog_final_pm.pdf
[25]
International Organization for Standardization (2022) ISO 7507-2:2022 Petroleum and Liquid Petroleum Products-Calibration of Vertical Cylindrical Tanks-Part 2: Optical-Reference-Line Method or Electro-Optical Distance-Ranging Method. 3rd Edition, ISO.
[26]
International Organization for Standardization (2023) ISO 4266-1:2023 Petroleum and Liquid Petroleum Products-Measurement of Level and Temperature in Storage Tanks by Automatic Methods-Part 1: Measurement of Level in Atmospheric Tanks. 2nd Edition, ISO.
[27]
National Institute of Standards and Technology (2026) Ethanol. NIST Chemistry WebBook (SRD 69). https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C64175&Type=HVAP
[28]
National Institute of Standards and Technology (2026) Methyl Alcohol. NIST Chemistry WebBook (SRD 69). https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C67561&Type=HVAP
[29]
ASTM International (2023) ASTM D2879-23, Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature Relationship and Initial Decomposition Temperature of Liquids by Isoteniscope. ASTM International.
[30]
Ibezim-Ezeani, M.U., Obi, C., Ekpo, I.E., Victor-Oji, C. and Tamunosaki, D. (2023) Basic Physical Chemistry. 1st Edition, CEL WIL.
[31]
eralytics GmbH (2021) Crude oil Vapor Pressure Testing: Why a Higher Shaker Speed Improves the Accuracy of ASTM D6377. https://eralytics.com/news/crude-oil-vapor-pressure-testing-why-higher-shaker-speed-improves-accuracy-of-astm-d6377/
[32]
ASTM International (2020) ASTM D6377-20, Standard Test Method for Determination of Vapor Pressure of Crude Oil: VPCRx (Expansion Method) ASTM International.
[33]
Goss-Sampson, M.A. (2025) Statistical Analysis in JASP: A Guide for Students. 7th Edition, JASP. https://jasp-stats.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Statistical-Analysis-in-JASP-A-guide-for-students-2025.pdf
[34]
Ragozzino, E., Bortolani, S., Di Pietro, L., Orecchini, E., Papait, A., Nanni, S., et al. (2026) RNA Cargo Profiling of Muscle Extracellular Vesicles Identifies Candidate Biomarkers of Disease Activity and Muscle Degeneration in FSHD. Journal of Translational Medicine, 24, Article 332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-07794-y
[35]
S？rgel, F., Thyroff-Friesinger, U., Vetter, A., Vens-Cappell, B. and Kinzig, M. (2009) Bioequivalence of HX575 (Recombinant Human Epoetin Alfa) and a Comparator Epoetin Alfa after Multiple Intravenous Administrations: An Open-Label Randomised Controlled Trial. BMC Clinical Pharmacology, 9, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-9-10
[36]
Kamal, I., Salih, N.M. and Martyushev, D.A. (2023) Correlations between Petroleum Reservoir Fluid Properties and Amount of Evolved and Dissolved Natural Gas: Case Study of Transgressive-Regressive-Sequence Sedimentary Rocks. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11, Article 1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11101891
[37]
American Chemical Society (2016) The Key Role of Hydrogen Bonding. https://www.acs.org/content/dam/acsorg/education/publications/ch8.pdf?utm
Spaska, O.A., Daszykowski, M. and Bushuev, Y.G. (2024) Evaluation of Evaporation Fluxes for Pesticides and Low Volatile Hazardous Materials Based on Evaporation Kinetics of Net Liquids. ACS Omega, 9, 18617-18623. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c01405
