Inclusion of Free-Oxygen Radical Scavengers within the Plastic Matrix of the Collection Vessel Appears to Positively Impact Sperm Biochemical Processes
Semen collection has been a mainstay in both human and animal-assisted reproduction for well over half a century. However, until quite recently, little care or concern has been raised about the conditions of the collection environment and their potential effects, not only on sperm quality, but on cycle outcomes as well. Within the last few years, it has become recognized that the abnormal environment of a collection container can lead to membrane disruption, organelle dysfunction, and DNA damage, all of which may limit or totally prevent positive outcomes. Nowhere is this more apparent than in humans and the equine, where intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has become the procedure of choice for fertilization during assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. Previous work from this laboratory has described a species-specific device for improved semen collection (DISC) that possesses several properties that help maintain sperm quality, including antioxidant scavengers within the plastic matrix. Using an equine model, the objective of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the original scavenger formulation (DISC) and a modified formulation (DISC+) in mitigating loss of biochemical function in sperm collected and maintained in a non-optimal environment, compared with the traditional collection device, the standard baby bottle.
References
[1]
Ruiz, S., Gardón, J.C. and Miró, J. (2023) Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) in Domestic Mammals. VeterinarySciences, 10, Article No. 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10040287
[2]
Asada, Y. (2024) Evolution of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: From Initial Challenges to Wider Applications. ReproductiveMedicineandBiology, 23, e12582. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12582
[3]
Claes, A. and Stout, T.A.E. (2022) Success Rate in a Clinical Equine in Vitro Embryo Production Program. Theriogenology, 187, 215-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.04.019
[4]
Gambini, A., Smith, J.M., Gurkin, R.J. and Palacios, P.D. (2025) Current and Emerging Advanced Techniques for Breeding Donkeys and Mules. Animals, 15, Article No. 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15070990
[5]
Palermo, G.D., O’Neill, C.L., Chow, S., Cheung, S., Parrella, A., Pereira, N., et al. (2017) Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: State of the Art in Humans. Reproduction, 154, F93-F110. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-17-0374
[6]
Prien, S. and Johnson, D. (2006) Improvement of the Semen Collection Environment Using a New Semen Collection Device. FertilityandSterility, 86, S508-S509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1409
[7]
Pe?a, F., Rodríguez Martínez, H., Tapia, J., Ortega Ferrusola, C., González Fernández, L. and Macías García, B. (2009) Mitochondria in Mammalian Sperm Physiology and Pathology: A Review. ReproductioninDomesticAnimals, 44, 345-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01211.x
[8]
Agarwal, A., Majzoub, A., Baskaran, S., Panner Selvam, M.K., Cho, C.L., Henkel, R., et al. (2020) Sperm DNA Fragmentation: A New Guideline for Clinicians. TheWorldJournalofMen’sHealth, 38, 412-471. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.200128
[9]
Du Plessis, S.S., Agarwal, A., Halabi, J. and Tvrda, E. (2015) Contemporary Evidence on the Physiological Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Human Sperm Function. JournalofAssistedReproductionandGenetics, 32, 509-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0425-7
[10]
Johnson, D.L. and Prien, S.D. (2014) A Novel Collection Technique for the Improvement of Semen Quality. JournalofDairy, Veterinary&AnimalResearch, 1, 4-7. https://doi.org/10.15406/jdvar.2014.01.00002
[11]
Prien, S.D., Sillivent, M., Borland, A. and Penrose, L.L. (2024) Impact of the Collection Environment on Sperm Physiology and Biochemistry and ITS Implications for Long-Term Outcomes. FertilityandSterility, 122, e124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.402
[12]
Prien, S.D., Forman, E.C., William, Z. and Johnson, D. (2025) Early Clinical Outcomes in an IVF Program Using ICSI Following Sample Collection in a Device Specifically Designed for Semen Collection (ProteX) vs a Standard Specimen Cup. OpenJournalofObstetricsandGynecology, 15, 639-646. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2025.153052
[13]
Lee, M.A., Trucco, G.S., Bechtol, K.B., Wummer, N., Kopf, G.S., Blasco, L., et al. (1987) Capacitation and Acrosome Reactions in Human Spermatozoa Monitored by a Chlortetracycline Fluorescence Assay. FertilityandSterility, 48, 649-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59480-1
[14]
Chronopoulou, E. and Harper, J.C. (2015) IVF Culture Media: Past, Present and Future. HumanReproductionUpdate, 21, 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu040
[15]
Sunde, A., Brison, D., Dumoulin, J., Harper, J., Lundin, K., Magli, M.C., et al. (2016) Time to Take Human Embryo Culture Seriously: Table I. HumanReproduction, 31, 2174-2182. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew157
[16]
Sharma, R.S., Saxena, R. and Singh, R. (2018) Infertility & Assisted Reproduction: A Historical & Modern Scientific Perspective. IndianJournalofMedicalResearch, 148, S10-S14. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_636_18
[17]
Johnson, D., Welch, L., Kauffman, R. and Penrose, L. (2023) Semen Collection in a Device Specifically Designed for Human Semen Improves Sample Physiological and Morphological Parameters. Archives of Health Sciences, 7, 1-8.