Human activity recognition (HAR) on heterogeneous edge-cloud systems faces a fundamental tension: lightweight on-device models offer fast inference but limited accuracy, while powerful cloud-side models improve recognition quality at substantial resource cost. Static deployment strategies—always using the edge model or always using the cloud model—fail to exploit the complementary strengths of each tier. We present ConfSched, a confidence-threshold scheduling policy that routes each HAR inference sample to the cloud model only when the edge model’s softmax confidence falls below a threshold
. We evaluate ConfSched against always-edge, always-cloud, and random-routing baselines on a 6-class, 10,299-sample HAR-structured synthetic dataset, using eight scheduling conditions across five random seeds. ConfSched at
achieves 83.19% accuracy with only 12.3% cloud offload rate on this dataset, outperforming both the always-edge baseline (81.35%) and the always-cloud baseline (82.35%) while using approximately seven times less cloud compute than always-cloud. Paired t-tests confirm that these differences are unlikely to be due to seed-level randomness on this dataset (
, Cohen’s
); we do not interpret them as evidence of dataset-level generalization. A threshold sensitivity analysis characterizes the accuracy-offload Pareto curve and is intended to inform—rather than prescribe—threshold selection in deployment. ConfSched is training-free and incurs negligible routing overhead (0.002 ms per sample). We position this work as a proof-of-concept: validation on real HAR benchmarks (UCI-HAR, PAMAP2) is required before recommending it as a deployment-ready policy.
References
[1]
Stampfler, T., Elgendi, M., Fletcher, R.R. Menon, C. (2023) The Use of Deep Learning for Smartphone-Based Human Activity Recognition. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article ID: 1086671.
[2]
Zhou, H., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Lu, S., An, X. and Liu, Q. (2023) Multi-Sensor Data Fusion and CNN-LSTM Model for Human Activity Recognition System. Sensors, 23, Article 4750. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23104750
[3]
Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Oneto, L., Parra, X. and Reyes-Ortiz, J.L. (2013) Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphones. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/240/human+activity+recogni-tion+using+smartphones
[4]
Wang, X., Tang, Z., Guo, J., et al. (2025) Empowering Edge Intelligence: A Compre-hensive Survey on On-Device AI Models. arXiv:2503.06027. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06027
[5]
Ngo, D., Park, H. and Kang, B. (2025) Edge Intelligence: A Review of Deep Neural Network Inference in Resource-Limited Environments. Electronics, 14, Article 2495. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14122495
[6]
Deniz, D., Ros, E., Ortigosa, E.M. and Barranco, F. (2024) Optimized Edge-Cloud System for Activity Monitoring Using Knowledge Distillation. Electronics, 13, Article 4786. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13234786
[7]
Ilhan, F., Chow, K.-H., Hu, S., et al. (2023) Adaptive Deep Neural Network Inference Optimization with Eenet. arXiv:2301.07099. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07099
[8]
Ilhan, F., Liu, L., Chow, K.-H., et al. (2023) EENet: Learning to Early Exit for Adaptive Inference. International Conference on Learning Representations, 1-16. https://openreview.net/forum?id=_SQ-303Iu6G
[9]
Yao, G. and Gupta, L. (2024) A Survey on the Use of Partitioning in IoT-Edge-AI Applications. arXiv:2406.00301. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.00301
[10]
Ye, S., Ouyang, B., Zeng, L., et al. (2025) Jupiter: Fast and Resource-Efficient Collaborative Inference of Generative LLMs on Edge Devices. arXiv:2504.08242. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08242
[11]
Yan, C., Liu, S., Liu, H., et al. (2024) Hybrid SD: Edge-Cloud Collaborative Inference for Stable Diffusion Models. arXiv:2408.06646. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06646
[12]
Wang, Y., Zhong, G., Duan, Y., Cheng, Y., Yin, M. and Yang, R. (2025) Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Deep Inference Towards Cloud-Edge Collaborative. Applied Soft Computing, 180, Article 113381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113381
[13]
Qiu, J., Yin, F., Wang, B. and Liang, B. (2025) Edge-Cloud Cooperative Inference for Semantic Segmentation Models. In: Sun, F., Wang, H., Long, H., Wei, Y. and Yu, H., Eds., Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Springer, 1-13. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-96-1698-5_1
[14]
Bajpai, D.J. and Hanawal, M.K. (2025) A Survey of Early Exit Deep Neural Networks in NLP. arXiv:2501.07670. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07670
[15]
Zhang, R., Jiang, H., Wang, W. and Liu, J. (2025) Optimization Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities for Edge Inference: A Comprehensive Survey. Electronics, 14, Article 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071345
[16]
Luo, Z. and Dai, X. (2024) Reinforcement Learning-Based Computation Offloading in Edge Computing: Principles, Methods, Challenges. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 108, 89-107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016824007798
[17]
Raju, L.R., Reddy, M.V.K., Surukanti, S.R., et al. (2026) IntelliScheduler: An Edge-Cloud Computing Environment Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Task Scheduling Based on Learning. Scientific Reports, 16, Article No. 11219. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-41330-8
[18]
Huang, R. (2026) Edge-Centric Generative AI: A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Models in Resource-Constrained Environments. Journal of ComputerandCommunications, 14, 238-253. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2026.144012