全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Characterizing the Variations of Dose Delivery to Coronary Vessels for Sr-90/Y-90 IVBT Using Monte Carlo Simulations

DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2026.152003, PP. 29-40

Keywords: IVBT, Monte Carlo Simulation, Dosimetry

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Purpose: To quantify using Monte Carlo simulations the variations of dose delivery to coronary vessels undergoing treatment by Sr-90/Y-90 intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT). Material and Methods: The Novoste Beta-Cath 3.5 F Sr-90/Y-90 pure beta-emitting source and geometry were modeled in GATE, open-source Monte Carlo software based on the Geant4 toolkit. Source spectrum through the stainless-steel capsule and flexible jacket were verified by comparing the simulated percent depth dose curve with the manufacturer’s data sheet. Dose distribution to the nominal vessel geometry (3.2 mm in diameter, 1.1 mm wall thickness, no stent) were calculated, and the variations of dose delivery were characterized as the dose ratio with and without perturbations due to implanted metallic stents, calcified plaques, variable vessel diameter, and sources offset from center. Results: A dose reduction of up to 26% was found throughout the vessel due to the presence of a stent, dependent on stent material, metallic surface area, and strut thickness. The introduction of calcified plaque further reduced vessel doses by up to 40%. The doses given to the smallest vessels in their prescription category were 34% higher than those to the largest vessels. Random motion of the source from excess space inside the 3.5 F catheter leads to an up to 18% increase in dose depending on the size of the vessel. Conclusion: The dose effects from these often-unavoidable perturbations in the nominal vessel geometry are found to be significant and attempts should be made to account for these effects in accurate dose calculations. The authors recommend a refining of the current prescriptions based on vessel diameter, so the largest and smallest vessels have <20% dose variation.

References

[1]  Shlofmitz, E., Iantorno, M. and Waksman, R. (2019) Restenosis of Drug-Eluting Stents: A New Classification System Based on Disease Mechanism to Guide Treatment and State-of-the-Art Review. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 12, e007023.
https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.118.007023
[2]  National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) (2010) Number of All-Listed Procedures for Discharges from Short-Stay Hospitals, by Procedure Category and Age: United States, 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
https://urldefense.com/v3/__
https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/nchs/data/nhds/4procedures/2010pro4_numberprocedureage.pdf__;!!BWcElQ!wpGcGwf2lzh8miqU3Q0hx84Ve3AP-V9OyaNsJtrZdmVMEWa0Uju5DPElqOMfGv4cUG5fPe4Zc3l9RIOLDYcbr7w$\"
https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/nchs/data/nhds/4procedures/2010pro4_numberprocedureage.pdf
[3]  Detloff, L.R., Ho, E.C., Ellis, S.G., Ciezki, J.P., Cherian, S. and Smile, T.D. (2022) Coronary Intravascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis: A Review of the Contemporary Literature. Brachytherapy, 21, 692-702.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2022.05.004
[4]  Nath, R., Amols, H., Coffey, C., Duggan, D., Jani, S., Li, Z., et al. (1999) Intravascular Brachytherapy Physics: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 60. Medical Physics, 26, 119-152.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598496
[5]  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2023) User’s Manual: Beta-Cath 3.5F System.
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1410/ML14106A083.pdf
[6]  Popma, J.J., Suntharalingam, M., Lansky, A.J., Heuser, R.R., Speiser, B., Teirstein, P.S., et al. (2002) Randomized Trial of 90 Sr/ 90 Y Β-Radiation versus Placebo Control for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis. Circulation, 106, 1090-1096.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000027814.96651.72
[7]  Sarrut, D., Arbor, N., Baudier, T., Borys, D., Etxebeste, A., Fuchs, H., et al. (2022) The Opengate Ecosystem for Monte Carlo Simulation in Medical Physics. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 67, Article 184001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac8c83
[8]  Chang, X., Huang, L., Liu, J., Cao, Y. and Chang, J. (2023) Monte Carlo Dosimetry of a Novel Yttrium‐90 Disc Source for Episcleral Brachytherapy. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 24, e14140.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14140
[9]  Rahdert, D.A., Sweet, W.L., Tio, F.O., Janicki, C. and Duggan, D.M. (1999) Measurement of Density and Calcium in Human Atherosclerotic Plaque and Implications for Arterial Brachytherapy. Cardiovascular Radiation Medicine, 1, 358-367.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1522-1865(00)00030-5
[10]  Moselewski, F., O’Donnell, C.J., Achenbach, S., Ferencik, M., Massaro, J., Nguyen, A., et al. (2005) Calcium Concentration of Individual Coronary Calcified Plaques as Measured by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography. Circulation, 111, 3236-3241.
https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.104.489781
[11]  Chemicool (2025) Tantalum. Chemicool Periodic Table.
https://www.chemicool.com/elements/tantalum.html
[12]  Li, X.A. (2003) Dose Effects of Stents in Intravascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis: A Monte Carlo Calculation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 55, 842-848.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04280-3
[13]  Lussier, L., Wallner, K., Kearney, K.E., Tiwana, J., Kim, E.Y., Parvathaneni, U., et al. (2023) Image-Guided Intravascular Brachytherapy Dose Escalation. Brachytherapy, 22, 518-523.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.04.004

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133