This work examines limited, testable consequences of a previously established background level redshift framework in which frequency-independent redshift is described by collisionless Liouville evolution without requiring metric expansion. It does not propose a new cosmological model, nor does it address structure formation, recombination microphysics, or the CMB power spectrum. The framework does not exclude a hot dense initial state; a recombination epoch is treated as a thermal threshold event compatible with both expansion and non-expansion interpretations of subsequent redshift. Treating an illustrative post-recombination relaxation form for the redshift kernel as a concrete hypothesis, this analysis shows that the parameterization predicts reduced cosmic assembly time at
relative to standard ΛCDM. Observations of early massive galaxies by JWST therefore act as an empirical constraint on the relaxation timescale and initial kernel rate, bounding the allowed post-recombination dynamics rather than resolving timing tensions. The paper further proves that frequency-independent redshift operators preserve angular multipole structure, once present, under collisionless evolution, strictly at the level of transport, establishing that the existence of CMB anisotropies alone does not logically discriminate between expansion and non-expansion redshift mechanisms at the level of angular transport. The analysis concludes by clarifying the precise observational content of CMB background and anisotropy data, explicitly delineating which inferences are supported and which require additional dynamical assumptions.
References
[1]
Cody, M.A. (2026) Cosmic Microwave Background without Expansion. JournalofModernPhysics, 17, 22-48. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2026.171003
[2]
Dodelson, S. (2020) Modern Cosmology. 2nd Edition, Academic Press.
[3]
Weinberg, S. (1972) Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. Wiley.
[4]
Mather, J.C., Cheng, E.S., Cottingham, D.A., Eplee, R.E., Fixsen, D.J., Hewagama, T., et al. (1994) Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum by the COBE FIRAS Instrument. TheAstrophysicalJournal, 420, 439-444. https://doi.org/10.1086/173574
[5]
Fixsen, D.J., Cheng, E.S., Gales, J.M., Mather, J.C., Shafer, R.A. and Wright, E.L. (1996) The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set. TheAstrophysicalJournal, 473, 576-587. https://doi.org/10.1086/178173
[6]
Fixsen, D.J. (2009) The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background. TheAstrophysicalJournal, 707, 916-920. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/707/2/916
[7]
Hu, W. and Silk, J. (1993) Thermalization and Spectral Distortions of the Cosmic Background Radiation. PhysicalReviewD, 48, 485-502. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.48.485
[8]
Chluba, J. and Sunyaev, R.A. (2012) The Evolution of CMB Spectral Distortions in the Early Universe. MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety, 419, 1294-1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19786.x
[9]
Ma, C.-P. and Bertschinger, E. (1995) Cosmological Perturbation Theory in the Synchronous and Conformal Newtonian Gauges. TheAstrophysicalJournal, 455, 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1086/176550
[10]
Seljak, U. and Zaldarriaga, M. (1996) A Line-of-Sight Integration Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies. TheAstrophysicalJournal, 469, 437-444. https://doi.org/10.1086/177793
[11]
Lewis, A., Challinor, A. and Lasenby, A. (2000) Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Models. TheAstrophysicalJournal, 538, 473-476. https://doi.org/10.1086/309179
Adams, N.J., Conselice, C.J., Ferreira, L., Austin, D., Trussler, J.A.A., Juodžbalis, I., et al. (2023) Discovery and Properties of Ultra-High Redshift Galaxies (9 < z < 12) in the jwst ERO SMACS 0723 Field. MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety, 518, 4755-4766. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3347
[14]
Curtis-Lake, E., Carniani, S., Cameron, A., Charlot, S., Jakobsen, P., Maiolino, R., et al. (2023) Spectroscopic Confirmation of Four Metal-Poor Galaxies at Z = 10.3-13.2. NatureAstronomy, 7, 622-632. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w
[15]
Labbé, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., Bezanson, R., Suess, K.A., Leja, J., et al. (2023) A Population of Red Candidate Massive Galaxies ~600 Myr after the Big Bang. Nature, 616, 266-269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2
[16]
Robertson, B.E., Tacchella, S., Johnson, B.D., Hainline, K., Whitler, L., Eisenstein, D.J., et al. (2023) Identification and Properties of Intense Star-Forming Galaxies at Redshifts Z > 10. NatureAstronomy, 7, 611-621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01921-1
[17]
Wang, B., Fujimoto, S., Labbé, I., Furtak, L.J., Miller, T.B., Setton, D.J., et al. (2023) UNCOVER: Illuminating the Early Universe—JWST/NIRSpec Confirmation of Z > 12 Galaxies. TheAstrophysicalJournalLetters, 957, L34. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acfe07
[18]
Boylan-Kolchin, M. (2023) Stress Testing ΛCDM with High-Redshift Galaxy Candidates. NatureAstronomy, 7, 731-735. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7
[19]
Yung, L.Y.A., Somerville, R.S., Finkelstein, S.L., et al. (2025) ΛCDM Is Still Not Broken.
[20]
McCaffrey, J., Hardin, S., Wise, J.H. and Regan, J.A. (2023) No Tension: JWST Galaxies at Z > 10 Consistent with Cosmological Simulations. TheOpenJournalofAstrophysics, 6, 47. https://doi.org/10.21105/astro.2304.13755
[21]
Dekel, A., Sarkar, K.C., Birnboim, Y., Mandelker, N. and Li, Z. (2023) Efficient Formation of Massive Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn by Feedback-Free Starbursts. MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSociety, 523, 3201-3218. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1557
[22]
Hu, W. and White, M. (1997) CMB Anisotropies: Total Angular Momentum Method. PhysicalReviewD, 56, 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.56.596
[23]
Challinor, A. and Lasenby, A. (1999) Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in the Cold Dark Matter Model: A Covariant and Gauge-Invariant Approach. TheAstrophysicalJournal, 513, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1086/306841