全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Beyond Rhetoric: An Analysis of the Structural Obstacles to the Digital Transformation of Cameroonian Local Authorities

DOI: 10.4236/jcc.2026.143012, PP. 231-245

Keywords: Digital Transformation, ICT4D, E-Government, Local Government, Structural Barriers, Decentralization

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The digital transformation of Cameroonian local authorities is regularly presented as a strategic lever for administrative modernization, improved public services, and strengthened citizen participation. However, beyond institutional rhetoric and stated strategies, results remain limited and fragmented. This article offers a critical analysis of the structural obstacles hindering this transformation, drawing on a comprehensive review of the international literature on e-government, ICTs for development, and public governance in developing countries. The study highlights a complex network of infrastructural, financial, organizational, institutional, socio-cultural, and legal constraints. It demonstrates that weak digital infrastructure, the budgetary dependence of local authorities, skills gaps, fragmented initiatives, and insufficient multi-level coordination constitute major obstacles to territorial digital transformation. These factors are exacerbated by the digital divide among citizens, the persistence of informal practices, and a regulatory framework that remains only partially operational. Drawing on international comparisons and documented African experiences, we propose strategic pathways based on a progressive, contextual, and systemic approach. This approach advocates the gradual construction of a territorial digital ecosystem integrating basic infrastructure, local capacity building, coordinated governance, and citizen ownership. The analysis concludes that the digital transformation of Cameroonian local authorities cannot succeed without structural reform that links political leadership, financial viability, and innovation tailored to local realities.

References

[1]  Mergel, I., Edelmann, N. and Haug, N. (2019) Defining Digital Transformation: Results from Expert Interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36, Article ID: 101385.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
[2]  Janowski, T. (2015) Digital Government Evolution: From Transformation to Contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 221-236.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
[3]  Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. and Grimes, J.M. (2010) Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264-271.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
[4]  Heeks, R. (2002) Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations. The Information Society, 18, 101-112.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039
[5]  Ndou, V. (2004) E-Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18, 1-24.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x
[6]  Manda, M.I. and Backhouse, J. (2016) Towards a “Smart Society” through a Connected and Smart Citizenry in South Africa: A Review of the National Broadband Strategy and Policy. In: Scholl, H.J., et al., Eds., Electronic Government, Springer International Publishing, 228-240.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_18
[7]  van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2006) Digital Divide Research, Achievements and Shortcomings. Poetics, 34, 221-235.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
[8]  Unwin, T. (2009) ICT4D: Information and Communication Technologies for Development. Cambridge University Press.
[9]  Donner, J. (2015) After Access: Inclusion, Development, and a More Mobile Inter-net. MIT Press.
[10]  Cariolle, J. and Goujon, M. (2019) Infrastructure and Development: An Overview of New Empirical Contributions. Revue d’économie du développement, 27, 41-78.
[11]  Avgerou, C. (2008) Information Systems in Developing Countries: A Critical Research Review. Journal of Information Technology, 23, 133-146.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000136
[12]  Kimaro, H.C. and Nhampossa, J.L. (2005) Analyzing the Problem of Unsustainable Health Information Systems in Less-Developed Economies: Case Studies from Tanzania and Mozambique. Information Technology for Development, 11, 273-298.
https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20016
[13]  Boex, J. and Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2007) Designing Intergovernmental Equalization Transfers with Imperfect Data: Concepts, Practices, and Lessons. In: Martinez-Vazquez, J. and Searle, B., Eds., Fiscal Equalization, Springer, 291-343.
[14]  Smoke, P. (2015) Rethinking Decentralization: Assessing Challenges to a Popular Public Sector Reform. Public Administration and Development, 35, 97-112.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1703
[15]  Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Al-Sobhi, F., Shareef, M.A. and Dwivedi, Y.K. (2013) Examining the Influence of Intermediaries in Facilitating e-Government Adoption: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 716-725.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.05.001
[16]  Gil-García, J.R. and Pardo, T.A. (2005) E-Government Success Factors: Mapping Practical Tools to Theoretical Foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 187-216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001
[17]  Orlikowski, W.J. (1996) Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A Situated Change Perspective. Information Systems Research, 7, 63-92.
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.63
[18]  Pardo, T.A. and Tayi, G.K. (2007) Interorganizational Information Integration: A Key Enabler for Digital Government. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 691-715.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.004
[19]  Ngwang, R. (2022) Colonial Legacies and (In)security in Africa: A Cameroonian Civil War Perspective. American Journal of International Relations, 7, 47-59.
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajir.1101
[20]  Cordella, A. and Bonina, C.M. (2012) A Public Value Perspective for ICT Enabled Public Sector Reforms: A Theoretical Reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 512-520.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004
[21]  Schuppan, T. (2009) E-Government in Developing Countries: Experiences from Sub-Saharan Africa. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 118-127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.006
[22]  Gil-García, J.R. (2012) Implementing e-Government Success: An Integrative Study of Government Websites, Organizational Capabilities and Institutions. Springer Science & Business Media.
[23]  Siddiquee, N.A. (2008) E-Government and Innovations in Service Delivery: The Malaysian Experience. International Journal of Public Administration, 31, 797-815.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690802153053
[24]  Yusuf, M. (2019) Digital Skills and e-Government Adoption in Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 11, 293-301.
[25]  Docquier, F. and Rapoport, H. (2012) Globalization, Brain Drain, and Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50, 681-730.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.3.681
[26]  Baro, E.E. and Endouware, B.C. (2013) The Effects of Mobile Phone on the Socio-Economic Life of the Rural Dwellers in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Information Technology for Development, 19, 249-263.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2012.755895
[27]  Dawes, S.S. (2009) Governance in the Digital Age: A Research and Action Framework for an Uncertain Future. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 257-264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.003
[28]  Luna-Reyes, L.F. and Gil-Garcia, J.R. (2014) Digital Government Transformation and Internet Portals: The Co-Evolution of Technology, Organizations, and Institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 545-555.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.001
[29]  Bailur, S. and Walsham, G. (2008) Whose Development? The Values of ICT for Development. Proceedings of the IFIP Working Group, Vol. 9, 19-21.
[30]  Lio, M., Liu, M. and Ou, Y. (2011) Can the Internet Reduce Corruption? A Cross-Country Study Based on Dynamic Panel Data Models. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 47-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.01.005
[31]  Warschauer, M. (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Di-vide. MIT Press.
[32]  Hossain, M.S., Hoda, M., et al. (2018) Cloud-Supported Framework for Patients in Post-Stroke Disability Rehabilitation. Telematics and Computer Science, 35, 826-836.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.001
[33]  Roy, A. (2005) Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71, 147-158.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976689
[34]  Simone, A. (2004) People as Infrastructure: Intersecting Fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16, 407-429.
https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-16-3-407
[35]  Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C. and Misuraca, G. (2014) Understanding the E-Government Paradox: Learning from Literature and Practice on Barriers to Adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 31, S63-S71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
[36]  Saxena, K.B.C. (2005) Towards Excellence in E-Governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18, 498-513.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510616733
[37]  Hood, C. (1991) A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
[38]  Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. and Tinkler, J. (2006) New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 467-494.
[39]  Walsham, G. (2017) ICT4D Research: Reflections on History and Future Agenda. Information Technology for Development, 23, 18-41.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406
[40]  Miscione, G. (2007) Telemedicine in the Upper Amazon: Interplay with Local Health Care Practices. MIS Quarterly, 31, 403-425.
https://doi.org/10.2307/25148797
[41]  Njihia, J.M. and Merali, Y. (2013) The Broader Context for ICT4D Projects: A Morphogenetic Analysis1. MIS Quarterly, 37, 881-904.
https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2013/37.3.10
[42]  Choudrie, J. and Dwivedi, Y. (2005) Investigating the Research Approaches for Examining Technology Adoption Issues. Journal of Research Practice, 1, D1.
[43]  Mas, I. and Morawczynski, O. (2009) Designing Mobile Money Services Lessons from M-PESA. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 4, 77-91.
https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2009.4.2.77
[44]  Girard, B. (2003) The One to Follow: Radio, New ICTs and Interactivity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
https://www.fao.org/fsnforum/resources/reports-and-briefs/one-watch-radio-new-icts-and-interactivity
[45]  Deen-Swarray, M., Moyo, M. and Stork, C. (2013) ICT Access and Usage among Informal Businesses in Africa. info, 15, 52-68.
https://doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2013-0025
[46]  Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M. and Lindgren, R. (2011) Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly, 35, 37-56.
https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488
[47]  Thompson, M. and Walsham, G. (2010) ICT Research in Africa: Need for a Strategic Developmental Focus. Information Technology for Development, 16, 112-127.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02681101003737390
[48]  Heeks, R. and Stanforth, C. (2007) Understanding e-Government Project Trajectories from an Actor-Network Perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 165-177.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000676
[49]  Hellström, J. (2008) Mobile Phones for Good Governance—Challenges and Perspectives. Stockholm University/UPGRAID, 11-12.
[50]  Krauss, K. (2013) Collisions between the Worldviews of International ICT Policy-Makers and a Deep Rural Community in South Africa: Assumptions, Interpretation, Implementation, and Reality. Information Technology for Development, 19, 296-318.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2013.793167
[51]  Janssen, M. and Estevez, E. (2013) Lean Government and Platform-Based Governance—Doing More with Less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1-S8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003
[52]  Pardo, T.A., Nam, T. and Burke, G.B. (2011) E-Government Interoperability: Interaction of Policy, Management, and Technology Dimensions. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 7-23.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310392184
[53]  Heeks, R. (2003) Most eGovernment-for-Development Projects Fail: How Can Risks Be Reduced? iGovernment Working Paper No. 14.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3540052

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133