全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Artificial Intelligence and Violation of the LGPD: Corporate Liability for the Misuse of Data

DOI: 10.4236/blr.2026.171012, PP. 202-219

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, LGPD, Data Privacy, Compliance, Civil Liability, Algorithmic Governance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the collection and processing of personal data poses significant legal challenges, particularly regarding compliance with the General Data Protection Law (LGPD). Decision-making automation, enabled by machine learning and deep learning, increases the need for traceability and transparency in the processing of personal information. However, algorithmic opacity and the biases embedded in predictive models hinder corporate accountability for potential privacy and data protection violations. Brazilian regulation still struggles to harmonize technological innovation with existing legal frameworks, as evidenced by recent issues related to automated decisions and leaks of sensitive data. The role of the National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) has been crucial in setting regulatory guidelines and best practices for AI governance, demanding greater corporate accountability in complying with the LGPD. Given the complexity of this issue, this study analyzes the civil liability of organizations for the misuse of AI in the processing of personal data, considering legal implications, regulatory challenges, and impacts on data subjects’ rights. The research explores the need for specific regulation of high-risk AI, the strengthening of compliance measures, and the adoption of algorithmic audits as mechanisms to mitigate risks. It concludes that the balance between innovation and data protection requires policies of transparency, algorithmic explainability, and more robust regulatory oversight to ensure compliance with the principles of the LGPD.

References

[1]  Abrantes, P. C. de (2023). Challenges and Dilemmas of Personal Data Protection in the Era of Algorithmic Culture. SciELO Preprints.
[2]  Araújo, A. R. de (2022). The Use of Personal and Artificial Data in Labor Relations: Protection, Discrimination, Digital Violence, and Harassment (448 p.). Ministério Público do Trabalho.
[3]  Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (2023). NBR ISO/IEC 42001:2023—Information Technology—Artificial Intelligence Management. ABNT.
[4]  Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (2024). Vote No. 11/2024/DIR-MW/CD. Case No. 00261.004509/2024-36. Rapporteur: Miriam Wimmer. ANPD.
[5]  Brazil (1990). Consumer Defense Code—Law No. 8.078.
https://www.gov.br/mj/pt-br/assuntos/seus-direitos/consumidor/Anexos/cdc-portugues-2013.pdf
[6]  Brazil (2018). Law No. 13.709.
https://www.gov.br/anpd/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/outros-documentos-e-publicacoes-institucionais/lgpd-en-lei-no-13-709-capa.pdf
[7]  Brazil (2023a). Court of Justice of Paraná State. 2nd Small Claims Recursal Panel. Unnamed Appeal. Case No. 0018165-45.2022.8.16.0021. Rapporteur: Irineu Stein Junior. Cascavel District.
https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/2100000025254851/Acórdão-0018165-45.2022.8.16.0021
[8]  Brazil (2023b). Supreme Court of Justice. Special Appeal No. 2.082.281-SP (2023/0222455-3).
https://www.conjur.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Banco-responde-por-Pix-feito-apos-ser-informado-de-roubo-de-celular.pdf
[9]  Brazil (2024). Special Appeal No. 2.130.619.
https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/stj/1780119718
[10]  California (2018). California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)—Assembly Bill No. 375.
https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa
[11]  California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). 2018.
https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa
[12]  Caracas Bandeira, A. L. T., & Ferreira, J. S. A. B. N. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the General Data Protection Law. Revista do Ministério Público do Estado de Goiás, 28.
https://esump.mpgo.mp.br/ojs/index.php/rmpgo/article/view/27/10
[13]  Costa, A. A., & Bruno, D. R. (2025). AI-Artificial Intelligence: Impacts, Risks, and Benefits Challenging Modern Society. Revista Interface Tecnológica, 1, 76-87.
[14]  European Union (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679. General Data Protection Regulation.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679
[15]  Fama, J. S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Privacy: Legal and Ethical Implications in the Digital Era. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento, 1, 15-39.
https://doi.org/10.32749/nucleodoconhecimento.com.br/tecnologia/implicacoes-legais
[16]  Freire de Sá, M. de F., & Macena de Lima, T. M. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and the General Data Protection Law: The Right to Explanation in Automated Decisions. Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil, 4, 227.
[17]  Kaufman, D. (2022). Demystifying Artificial Intelligence (331 p.). Autêntica.
[18]  Lima, T. M. M. de, & Sá, M. de F. F. de (2020). Artificial Intelligence and the General Data Protection Law: The Right to Explanation in Automated Decisions (pp. 227-246). Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil—RBDCivil, Belo Horizonte.
[19]  Ludgero, P. R. (2024). Civil Liability for the Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in Candidate Selection Processes: Legal Implications in Brazil. Jusbrasil.
[20]  Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2013). Privacy Principles and Personal Data Protection.
[21]  Paulo, M. A., & Jacobsen, G. (2023). Challenges to the General Data Protection Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Between the Right to Privacy and Robocalls. Revista de Direito, Inovação, Propriedade Intelectual e Concorrência, Florianópolis, Brazil, 2.
[22]  Poeta, V. S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Personal Data Protection: Effects of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on Fundamental Rights Guarantees under Brazilian Law. Master’s Dissertation, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí.
[23]  Russell, S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Our Favor: How to Maintain Control over Technology (Trans. Berilo Vargas). Cia das Letras.
[24]  Sichman, J. S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Society: Advances and Risks. Estudos Avançados, 35, 37-50.
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.2021.35101.004
[25]  Silva, F. C. (2023b). Protection of Sensitive Data in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Course Completion Work (MBA in Artificial Intelligence and Big Data), University of São Paulo.
[26]  Silva, P. R. A. da (2023a). Civil Liability for Acts of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Regulatory Perspectives and the Relevance of ANPD’s Role in Preventing Risks in Auto-Mated Data Processing. Jusbrasil.
[27]  Superior Court of Justice (STJ) (2023). Missed Opportunities, Possible Remedies: The Lost Chance Theory at the STJ.
[28]  Veja (2025). Largest Data Breach in Pix History Exposes Data from More than 11 Million Keys. Veja.
https://veja.abril.com.br/economia/maior-vazamento-da-historia-do-pix-expoe-dados-de-mais-de-11-milhoes-de-chaves/
[29]  Wang, S., Li, Y., Zhao, A., & Wang, Q. (2021). Privacy Protection in Federated Learning Based on Differential Privacy and Mutual Information. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Manufacture (pp. 428-435). ACM.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3495018.3495093
[30]  Xavier, M. R. P., & Dantas, A. G. A. (2021). Algorithmic Surveillance Device: Tracking Algorithms and Data Collection. Simbiótica. Revista Eletrônica, 8, 94-127.
https://doi.org/10.47456/simbitica.v8i4.37348

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133