全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

多模态电学层析成像系统气液两相流持液率及流量对比分析研究
Comparative Analysis on Liquid Holdup and Flow Rate in Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Using Multimodal Electrical Tomography Systems

DOI: 10.12677/jogt.2026.481005, PP. 38-47

Keywords: 气液两相流,持液率,流量计算,ERT/ECT,多模态传感,参数优化
Gas-Liquid Two?Phase Flow
, Liquid Holdup, Flow Rate Calculation, ERT/ECT, Multimodal Sensing, Parameter Optimization

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为精准量化气液两相流核心参数(持液率、液相/气相流量),解决不同流型、工况下参数计算精度不足的问题,结合4类持液率计算方法与4类流量计算模型,基于多模态电阻层析成像(ERT1/ERT2)与电容层析成像(ECT)系统,开展气多相流实验分析。通过数据热图、方法对比、时间序列分析、概率密度分布及质量评估雷达图等多维度分析框架,系统验证不同计算方法的适用性与单系统特性。结果表明:ERT1系统稳定性最优(变异系数23.3%),Otsu阈值法在三系统中一致性最高(77.6% ± 19.8%),其平均误差 ≤ 6%;ECT对气液界面响应敏感,适合流型识别(双组分分布验证厚液膜特征),ERT1定量计算精度最优(误差 ± 2%),多系统融合可互补传感盲区,将综合误差从±12.6%降至±5%。4类流量计算模型中,修正型模型精度最优(误差 ± 2%),适配工业现场温压波动场景。该研究为气液两相流参数在线精准测量提供了理论方法与实验依据。
To accurately quantify key parameters of gas-liquid two-phase flow (liquid holdup, liquid/gas flow rates) and address insufficient calculation accuracy under different flow patterns and working conditions, four types of liquid holdup calculation methods and four types of flow rate calculation models are connected. Based on multimodal electrical resistance tomography (ERT1/ERT2) and electrical capacitance tomography (ECT) systems, a calibration experiment was conducted under horizontal flow conditions. Through a multidimensional analysis framework including data heatmaps, method comparison, time?series analysis, probability density distribution, Gaussian mixture modelling, and quality assessment radar charts, the applicability of different calculation methods and the characteristics of individual systems were systematically validated. The results show that the ERT1 system exhibits the best stability (coefficient of variation 23.3%), and the Otsu threshold method achieves the highest consistency across the three systems (77.6% ± 19.8%) with an average error ≤ 6%. The ECT system is sensitive to gas-liquid interfaces and is suitable for flow pattern identification (two? component distribution verifies thick liquid film characteristics). ERT1 provides the best quantitative calculation accuracy (error ± 2%). Multi?system fusion can compensate for sensing blind spots, reducing the comprehensive error from ±12.6% to ±5%. Among the four types of flow rate calculation models, the modified model delivers the highest accuracy (error ± 2%) and is suitable for industrial scenarios with temperature and pressure fluctuations. This study provides theoretical methods and experimental evidence for accurate online measurement of gas-liquid two?phase flow parameters.

References

[1]  Brennen, C.E. (2005) Fundamentals of Multiphase Flow. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807169
[2]  Aliyu, A.M., Choudhury, R., Sohani, B., Atanbori, J., Ribeiro, J.X.F., Ahmed, S.K.B., et al. (2023) An Artificial Neural Network Model for the Prediction of Entrained Droplet Fraction in Annular Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Vertical Pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 164, Article ID: 104452.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2023.104452
[3]  Thome, J.R. (2004) Engineering Data Book III. Wolverine Tube Inc.
[4]  Mandhane, J.M., Gregory, G.A. and Aziz, K. (1974) A Flow Pattern Map for Gas—Liquid Flow in Horizontal Pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1, 537-553.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(74)90006-8
[5]  Yang, W.Q. and Peng, L. (2002) Image Reconstruction Algorithms for Electrical Capacitance Tomography. Measurement Science and Technology, 14, R1-R13.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/14/1/201
[6]  Isaksen, Ø. (1996) A Review of Reconstruction Techniques for Capacitance Tomography. Measurement Science and Technology, 7, 325-337.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/7/3/013
[7]  Wang, M. and Dong, F. (2020). Electrical Tomography for Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Measurement: A Review. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 72, Article ID: 101715.
[8]  Xie, C.G., Huang, S.M., Beck, M.S., Hoyle, B.S., Thorn, R., Lenn, C., et al. (1992) Electrical Capacitance Tomography for Flow Imaging: System Model for Development of Image Reconstruction Algorithms and Design of Primary Sensors. IEE Proceedings G Circuits, Devices and Systems, 139, 89-98.
https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-g-2.1992.0015
[9]  Yuan, Y. and Gao, Y. (2016) A Study on Hydrodynamic Characteristics in a φ38 Pulsed Extraction Column by Four‐sensor Optical Fiber Probe. AIChE Journal, 63, 801-811.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15328
[10]  Dong, C. and Hibiki, T. (2018) Heat Transfer Correlation for Two-Component Two-Phase Slug Flow in Horizontal Pipes. Applied Thermal Engineering, 141, 866-876.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.06.029
[11]  Woldesemayat, M.A. and Ghajar, A.J. (2007) Comparison of Void Fraction Correlations for Different Flow Patterns in Horizontal and Upward Inclined Pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 33, 347-370.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.09.004
[12]  Tan, C. and Dong, F. (2009) Direct Determination of Void Fraction from Electrical Capacitance Tomography Images. Measurement Science and Technology, 20, Article ID: 105504.
[13]  Zuber, N. and Findlay, J.A. (1965) Average Volumetric Concentration in Two-Phase Flow Systems. Journal of Heat Transfer, 87, 453-468.
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3689137
[14]  W., L.R. (1899) A Treatise on Magnetism and Electricity. Nature, 59, 314-314.
https://doi.org/10.1038/059314a0
[15]  Bruggeman, D.A.G. (1935) Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitätskonstanten und Leitfähigkeiten der Mischkörper aus isotropen Substanzen. Annalen der Physik, 416, 636-664.
https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19354160705
[16]  Jin, H., Lian, Y., Yang, S., He, G. and Guo, Z. (2013) The Parameters Measurement of Air-Water Two Phase Flow Using the Electrical Resistance Tomography (ERT) Technique in a Bubble Column. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 31, 55-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2012.11.002
[17]  Chisholm, D. (1967) A Theoretical Basis for the Lockhart-Martinelli Correlation for Two-Phase Flow. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 10, 1767-1778.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(67)90047-6
[18]  Zhang, J., Wang, H., Yang, W. and Ren, Y. (2022) A Data Fusion Method for Liquid Holdup Measurement Based on Multimodal Electrical Tomography (ERT & ECT). Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 83, Article ID: 102108.
[19]  Otsu, N. (1979) A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9, 62-66.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1979.4310076
[20]  Adams, R. and Bischof, L. (1994) Seeded Region Growing. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16, 641-647.
https://doi.org/10.1109/34.295913
[21]  Reynolds, D. (2009) Gaussian Mixture Models. In: Li, S.Z. and Jain, A., Eds., Encyclopedia of Biometrics, Springer, 659-663.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_196

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133