全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Study of Forest Management Evaluation System Based on the Improvement of Wildlife Habitat Quality

DOI: 10.4236/nr.2026.173006, PP. 91-111

Keywords: Forest Management, Habitat Quality, Wildlife, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Evaluation System

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

With the intensification of global climate change and human activities, forest ecosystems face issues such as structural simplification, habitat fragmentation, and biodiversity decline. Traditional forest management evaluation systems, which focus primarily on timber production or single ecological functions, are no longer sufficient to com-preventively reflect the impact of forest management measures on wildlife habitat quality and ecosystem stability. In response to meet the need for the transformation of forest management from resource utilization to ecosystem health and biodiversity conservation, constructing a forest management evaluation system centered on improving wildlife habitat quality has significant theoretical and practical implications. Based on relevant theories in ecology, landscape ecology, and forest management, a three-tier evaluation system was developed (goal layer, criterion layer, indicator layer). Through literature analysis, expert consultations, and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), 35 core evaluation indicators were selected from four dimensions: biodiversity, forest structure, ecological functions, and socio-economic & management. A weighted composite evaluation model was constructed to quantitatively assess the impact of forest management measures on habitat quality. The system’s applicability and sensitivity were tested in the Yanshan-Taihang Mountain forest area, using plot surveys, wildlife monitoring, and statistical data. 1) Biodiversity and forest structure indicators had higher weights, making them the primary drivers of habitat quality variation in the study area; 2) Ecological function indicators played a sustained role in supporting habitat quality, reflecting the stability and resilience of the forest ecosystem; 3) Socio-economic and management indicators contributed less individually but were essential for regulating human disturbances and ensuring the long-term improvement of habitat quality. Overall, the evaluation system accurately reflected the changes in forest habitat quality under different management scenarios. This study emphasizes the improvement of wildlife habitat quality as the core objective of forest management evaluation. The developed multi-dimensional evaluation system is ecologically oriented and highly operational, offering a scientific basis for near-natural forest management, habitat restoration, and the optimization of forest management plans.

References

[1]  Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1998) The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Ecological Economics, 25, 3-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(98)00020-2
[2]  MEA (2005) Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report. Island Press.
[3]  Sotirov, M., Pokorny, B., Kleinschmit, D. and Kanowski, P. (2020) International Forest Governance and Policy: Institutional Architecture and Pathways of Influence in Global Sustainability. Sustainability, 12, Article 7010.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177010
[4]  Garrett, L., Lévite, H., Besacier, C., Alekseeva, N. and Duchelle, M. (2022) The Key Role of Forest and Landscape Restoration in Climate Action. FAO, 100 p.
[5]  Pörtner, H., Scholes, R.J., Arneth, A., Barnes, D.K.A., Burrows, M.T., Diamond, S.E., et al. (2023) Overcoming the Coupled Climate and Biodiversity Crises and Their Societal Impacts. Science, 380, eabl4881.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4881
[6]  FAO (2015) Global Forest Resources Assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[7]  Lindenmayer, D.B. and Franklin, J.F. (2013) Conserving Forest Biodiversity: A Comprehensive Multiscaled Approach. Island Press.
[8]  Newbold, T., Hudson, L.N., Hill, S.L.L., Contu, S., Lysenko, I., Senior, R.A., et al. (2015) Global Effects of Land Use on Local Terrestrial Biodiversity. Nature, 520, 45-50.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14324
[9]  van der Plas, F., Manning, P., Soliveres, S., Allan, E., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Verheyen, K., et al. (2016) Biotic Homogenization Can Decrease Landscape-Scale Forest Multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 3557-3562.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517903113
[10]  Wilson, E.O. (2010) The Diversity of Life. Harvard University Press, 416, 424.
[11]  SCBD (2010) Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at Its Tenth Meeting.
[12]  Cruise, A. (2025) Terms of Conflict: The Language of Dominance and Power at the Human-Wildlife Interface. Biodiversity and Conservation, 35, Article No. 6.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-025-03212-9
[13]  Lindenmayer, D.B. and Franklin, J.F. (2002) Conserving Forest Biodiversity: A Comprehensive Multiscaled Approach. Island Press.
[14]  Pommerening, A. (2004) A Review of the History, Definitions and Methods of Continuous Cover Forestry with Special Attention to Afforestation and Restocking. Forestry, 77, 27-44.
https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/77.1.27
[15]  (2022) Kunming-Montreal Global biodiversity Framework. The Convention on Biological Diversity.
https://www.cbd.int/gbf/targets
[16]  (2024) China National Biodiversity Conservation Strategy and Action Plan (2023-2030). Ministry of Ecology and Environment. (In Chinese)
https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywdt/hjywnews/202401/t20240118_1064111.shtml
[17]  Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Li, X., Yu, T., Pei, K., Zhong, Y., et al. (2025) Area of Habitat Maps for National Key Protected Wildlife in China. Scientific Data, 12, Article No. 1155.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05489-5
[18]  Dou, T.T., Zhao, C.S., Niu, J.Z., Lun, X.X., Lin, X.N. and Yang, T. (2025) Health Assessment and Driving Factors Analysis of Forest Ecosystems in Mountainous Areas of Beijing. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 39, 264-275.
https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.05.006
[19]  Wang, L., Wei, F., Tagesson, T., Fang, Z. and Svenning, J. (2025) Transforming Forest Management through Rewilding: Enhancing Biodiversity, Resilience, and Biosphere Sustainability under Global Change. One Earth, 8, Article ID: 101195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101195
[20]  Fischer, S., Drosopoulos, S., Tsen, J. and Born, J. (2006) Implicit Learning-Explicit Knowing: A Role for Sleep in Memory System Interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 311-319.
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.3.311
[21]  Lindenmayer, D.B., Franklin, J.F. and Fischer, J. (2006) General Management Principles and a Checklist of Strategies to Guide Forest Biodiversity Conservation. Biological Conservation, 131, 433-445.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.019
[22]  Liu, S.R., Yang, Y.J. and Wang, H. (2018) Development Strategy and Management Countermeasures of Planted Forests in China: Transforming from Timber-Centered Single Objective Management Towards Multi-Purpose Management for Enhancing Quality and Benefits of Ecosystem Services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201712072201
[23]  Potterf, M., Eyvindson, K., Blattert, C., Triviño, M., Burner, R.C., Burgas, D., et al. (2023) Diversification of Forest Management Can Mitigate Wind Damage Risk and Maintain Biodiversity. European Journal of Forest Research, 143, 419-436.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01625-1
[24]  Fida, G.T., Baatuuwie, B.N. and Issifu, H. (2025) A Systematic Review on the Driving Forces of Habitat Quality Dynamics. Environment, Development and Sustainability.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06722-2
[25]  Liu, S.R., Chen, Y.Q., Nie, X.Q., Ming, A.A. AND Wang, H. (2026) Effects of Tree Species Diversity on Multifunctionality and Resilience of Forest Ecosystems. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 62, 1-18.
http://www.linyekexue.net/CN/10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20260001
[26]  Bing, W. (2015) Construction and Utilization of Continuous Inventory System for Forest Ecology. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 37, 1-14.
https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2015.01.011
[27]  Wang, B., Niu, X. and Wei, W. (2020) National Forest Ecosystem Inventory System of China: Methodology and Applications. Forests, 11, Article 732.
https://doi.org/10.3390/f11070732
[28]  (2025) China National Forest Inventory Technical Regulations. State Forestry Administration of China.
[29]  Sun, R., Cui, G.F., Lei, T. and Zheng, Y.M. (2013) An Evaluation Index System Classifying the Conservation Value of Wetland Nature Reserves Based on AHP. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 1952-1963.
https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201112101894
[30]  Fernandez, F.A.S., Rheingantz, M.L., Genes, L., Kenup, C.F., Galliez, M., Cezimbra, T., et al. (2017) Rewilding the Atlantic Forest: Restoring the Fauna and Ecological Interactions of a Protected Area. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15, 308-314.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.09.004
[31]  Gibson, L., Lee, T.M., Koh, L.P., Brook, B.W., Gardner, T.A., Barlow, J., et al. (2011) Primary Forests Are Irreplaceable for Sustaining Tropical Biodiversity. Nature, 478, 378-381.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10425
[32]  Simonson, W.D., Allen, H.D. and Coomes, D.A. (2014) Applications of Airborne Lidar for the Assessment of Animal Species Diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 719-729.
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12219
[33]  Lefcheck, J.S., Byrnes, J.E.K., Isbell, F., Gamfeldt, L., Griffin, J.N., Eisenhauer, N., et al. (2015) Biodiversity Enhances Ecosystem Multifunctionality across Trophic Levels and Habitats. Nature Communications, 6, Article No. 6936.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7936
[34]  Socolar, J.B., Gilroy, J.J., Kunin, W.E. and Edwards, D.P. (2016) How Should Beta-Diversity Inform Biodiversity Conservation? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 67-80.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.005
[35]  Hua, F., Bruijnzeel, L.A., Meli, P., Martin, P.A., Zhang, J., Nakagawa, S., et al. (2022) The Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Contributions and Trade-Offs of Forest Restoration Approaches. Science, 376, 839-844.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4649
[36]  Neumann, M. and Starlinger, F. (2001) The Significance of Different Indices for Stand Structure and Diversity in Forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 145, 91-106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00577-6
[37]  Martinuzzi, S., Vierling, L.A., Gould, W.A., Falkowski, M.J., Evans, J.S., Hudak, A.T., et al. (2009) Mapping Snags and Understory Shrubs for a Lidar-Based Assessment of Wildlife Habitat Suitability. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 2533-2546.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.07.002
[38]  Mura, M., McRoberts, R.E., Chirici, G. and Marchetti, M. (2015) Estimating and Mapping Forest Structural Diversity Using Airborne Laser Scanning Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 170, 133-142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.09.016
[39]  Valbuena, R., Eerikäinen, K., Packalen, P. and Maltamo, M. (2016) Gini Coefficient Predictions from Airborne Lidar Remote Sensing Display the Effect of Management Intensity on Forest Structure. Ecological Indicators, 60, 574-585.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.001
[40]  Thers, H., Bøcher, P.K. and Svenning, J. (2019) Using Lidar to Assess the Development of Structural Diversity in Forests Undergoing Passive Rewilding in Temperate Northern Europe. PeerJ, 6, e6219.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6219
[41]  Rosenvald, R. and Lõhmus, A. (2008) For What, When, and Where Is Green-Tree Retention Better than Clear-Cutting? A Review of the Biodiversity Aspects. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.016
[42]  Nagendra, H., Lucas, R., Honrado, J.P., Jongman, R.H.G., Tarantino, C., Adamo, M., et al. (2013) Remote Sensing for Conservation Monitoring: Assessing Protected Areas, Habitat Extent, Habitat Condition, Species Diversity, and Threats. Ecological Indicators, 33, 45-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.014
[43]  Ray, B., Mukherjee, P. and Bhattacharya, R.N. (2016) Attitudes and Cooperation: Does Gender Matter in Community-Based Forest Management? Environment and Development Economics, 22, 594-623.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x16000358
[44]  Rakovic, J., Futter, M.N., Kyllmar, K., Rankinen, K., Stutter, M.I., Vermaat, J., et al. (2020) Nordic Bioeconomy Pathways: Future Narratives for Assessment of Water-Related Ecosystem Services in Agricultural and Forest Management. Ambio, 49, 1710-1721.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01389-7
[45]  Timilsina, S., Sharma, G.B., Poudel, P. and Timilsina, A. (2024) Users’ Participation in Community Forest Management: A Comparative Study. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 15, 1335-1343.
https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2024.05.020
[46]  Vítková, L., Bače, R., Kjučukov, P. and Svoboda, M. (2018) Deadwood Management in Central European Forests: Key Considerations for Practical Implementation. Forest Ecology and Management, 429, 394-405.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.034
[47]  Bhardwaj, A., Kunhamu, T.K., Ashwath, M.N., Shil, S., Maurya, L.L., Dash, U., et al. (2025) Deadwood Dynamics: Adaptive Ecology in Forest Landscapes. In: Shukla, G., Manohar K., A., Raj Kizha, A., Panwar, P. and Chakravarty, S., Eds., Forest Degradation and Management, Springer, 475-503.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84055-5_25
[48]  Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill.
[49]  Vaidya, O.S. and Kumar, S. (2006) Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133