Improving Risk Stratification for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade II: A Prospective Cohort Study on Combined HPV DNA and E6/E7 mRNA Testing to Predict Histologic Progression
Background: The management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II (CIN II) is challenging due to its unpredictable natural history. Although high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA testing is highly sensitive, it lacks specificity in predicting which lesions will progress. Detection of E6/E7 oncogene mRNA reflects viral oncogenic activity. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate and compare the performance of HR-HPV DNA testing, E6/E7 mRNA testing, and their combination in predicting the histologic progression of CIN II lesions, using repeat histopathology as the gold standard. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 150 women with biopsy-confirmed CIN II. Baseline cervical samples were collected for HR-HPV DNA detection (using a validated PCR-based assay) and E6/E7 mRNA detection (using a proprietary nucleic acid amplification test). All participants were followed for 12 months, with the primary endpoint defined as histologic progression to CIN III or worse (CIN III+), confirmed by colposcopic-directed biopsy or conization. The predictive efficacies of the tests, alone and in combination, were assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: After 12 months, histologic progression was confirmed in 16 patients (10.7%). The sensitivities for predicting progression were similar for HPV DNA (0.905) and E6/E7 mRNA (0.857) testing. However, E6/E7 mRNA showed higher specificity (0.792) than HPV DNA (0.701) (AUC: 0.861 vs. 0.827). The combined testing strategy (defined as positivity for both assays) demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, achieving a specificity of 0.917 while maintaining a sensitivity of 0.857. The area under the ROC curve for the combined model was 0.912 (95% CI: 0.854 - 0.952), which was significantly superior to that of HPV DNA testing alone (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For women with biopsy-confirmed CIN II, a combined testing strategy for HPV DNA and E6/E7 mRNA significantly improves the prediction of histologic progression by markedly increasing specificity. This approach offers a powerful tool for precise risk stratification, potentially reducing overtreatment while ensuring timely intervention for high-risk individuals.
References
[1]
Zhou, Y., Shi, X., Liu, J. and Zhang, L. (2023) Correlation between Human Papillomavirus Viral Load and Cervical Lesions Classification: A Review of Current Research. FrontiersinMedicine, 10, Article 1111269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1111269
[2]
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
[3]
Perkins, R.B., Guido, R.S., Castle, P.E., Chelmow, D., Einstein, M.H., Garcia, F., et al. (2020) 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. JournalofLowerGenitalTractDisease, 24, 102-131. https://doi.org/10.1097/lgt.0000000000000525
[4]
Kylebäck, K., Ekeryd-Andalen, A., Greppe, C., Björkenfeldt Havel, C., Zhang, C. and Strander, B. (2022) Active Expectancy as Alternative to Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 in Women Aged 25 to 30 Years: ExCIN2—A Prospective Clinical Multicenter Cohort Study. AmericanJournalofObstetricsandGynecology, 227, 742.e1-742.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.051
[5]
Stuebs, F.A., Koch, M.C., Dietl, A.K., Adler, W., Geppert, C., Hartmann, A., et al. (2022) Cytology and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Test for Cervical Cancer Screening Assessment. Diagnostics, 12, Article 1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071748
[6]
Dempster-Rivett, K., Innes, C.R., Simcock, B.J., Harker, D., Williman, J.A., Van Der Griend, R.A., et al. (2020) Evaluation of Guidelines for Observational Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 in Young Women. AmericanJournalofObstetricsandGynecology, 223, 408.e1-408.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.029
[7]
Liang, L.A., Einzmann, T., Franzen, A., Schwarzer, K., Schauberger, G., Schriefer, D., et al. (2021) Cervical Cancer Screening: Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear Test, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Human Papillomavirus Testing as Stand-Alone or Cotesting Strategies. CancerEpidemiology, Biomarkers&Prevention, 30, 474-484. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1003
[8]
Giorgi Rossi, P., Baldacchini, F. and Ronco, G. (2014) The Possible Effects on Socio-Economic Inequalities of Introducing HPV Testing as Primary Test in Cervical Cancer Screening Programs. FrontiersinOncology, 4, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00020
[9]
Moody, C.A. and Laimins, L.A. (2010) Human Papillomavirus Oncoproteins: Pathways to Transformation. NatureReviewsCancer, 10, 550-560. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2886
[10]
Giorgi Rossi, P., Ronco, G., Mancuso, P., Carozzi, F., Allia, E., Bisanzi, S., et al. (2022) Performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA Assay as Primary Screening Test: Results from the NTCC2 Trial. InternationalJournalofCancer, 151, 1047-1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34120
[11]
Song, Y., Zhang, M., Zhang, C., Du, S. and Zhai, F. (2024) Logistic Regression Analysis of mRNA Expression Changes and Prognosis after Cervical Surgery. AIPAdvances, 14, Article ID: 025233. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0177033
[12]
Gupta, S.M., Warke, H., Chaudhari, H., Mavani, P., Katke, R.D., Kerkar, S.C., et al. (2022) Human Papillomavirus E6/E7 Oncogene Transcripts as Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Cervical Cancer. JournalofMedicalVirology, 94, 3368-3375. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27700
[13]
Zhao, F., Lin, M.J., Chen, F., Hu, S., Zhang, R., Belinson, J.L., et al. (2010) Performance of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing as a Primary Screen for Cervical Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data from 17 Population-Based Studies from China. TheLancetOncology, 11, 1160-1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70256-4
[14]
Hu, Z., Zhu, D., Wang, W., Li, W., Jia, W., Zeng, X., et al. (2015) Genome-wide Profiling of HPV Integration in Cervical Cancer Identifies Clustered Genomic Hot Spots and a Potential Microhomology-Mediated Integration Mechanism. NatureGenetics, 47, 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3178
[15]
Kyrgiou, M., Kalliala, I., Mitra, A., Fotopoulou, C., Ghaem-Maghami, S., Martin-Hirsch, P.P., et al. (2017) Immediate Referral to Colposcopy versus Cytological Surveillance for Minor Cervical Cytological Abnormalities in the Absence of HPV Test. CochraneDatabaseofSystematicReviews, No. 1, CD009836. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009836.pub2
[16]
Fan, Y. and Shen, Z. (2018) The Clinical Value of HPV E6/E7 and STAT3 mRNA Detection in Cervical Cancer Screening. Pathology—ResearchandPractice, 214, 767-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2018.02.003
[17]
Zappacosta, R., Sablone, F., Pansa, L., Buca, D., Buca, D. and Rosini, S. (2017) Analytic and Diagnostic Performances of Human Papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA Test on Up-To 11-Year-Old Liquid-Based Cervical Samples. A Biobank-Based Longitudinal Study. InternationalJournalofMolecularSciences, 18, Article 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071480