Objectives: Gynecomastia is a diffuse benign enlargement of the male breast. Its incidence has been increasing recently, especially among young males. This study aims to analyze the outcome of the gynecomastia cases operated at a tertiary care center and assess its clinical correlation. Patients and Methods: The medical records of patients operated on for 8 years (between January 2015 and December 2022) at the Plastic Surgery Department, were reviewed. This 8-year retrospective study analyzed the demographic data, the history and clinical picture of the gynecomastia presentation, and the surgeries performed with the postoperative complications. Results: A total of 196 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 31.2 years (16 - 51 years). The mean duration of gynecomastia was 4.9 years (2 months - 37 years). 59 patients had primary gynecomastia since puberty (30.1%), while 137 patients had secondary gynecomastia (69.9%). 101 of the patients had a history of hormonal injections (51.5%), while 95 patients denied receiving these injections (48.5%). 97 cases had 2ry gynaecomastia and received hormonal injections (70.8% of the 2ry gynaecomastia cases). 130 cases complained of swelling of the breasts and 114 complained of tenderness. Bilateral gynaecomastia was found in 169 cases (86.2%) and unilateral in the rest 27 cases (13.8%). 20 cases underwent liposuction surgery, 36 cases had retroareolar discs excision, 105 cases had liposuction with retroareolar discs excision, 8 cases had Doughnut procedure while 15 cases had both doughnut and liposuction done. Mastectomy with nipple areolae graft was done in 10 cases. 32 patients (16.16%) had postoperative complications in the form of early complications of haematoma in 6 cases and seroma in 2 cases. Delayed complications included recurrence in 17 cases and hypertrophic scars in 4 cases while 2 patients complained of asymmetry and one patient had chronic left axillary nerve irritation. Conclusion: The incidence of gynecomastia increases with hormonal and protein intake. The incidence of postoperative complications had no significant relation to the type of surgery performed in our cases.
References
[1]
Abdel Nasser, M. and Khallaf, M.H. (2014) Gynaecomastia Liposuction vs Surgical Excision of the Glandular Tissue. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 12, 148-161.
[2]
Polat, S., Cuhaci, N., Evranos, B., Ersoy, R. and Cakir, B. (2014) Gynecomastia: Clinical Evaluation and Management. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 18, 150-158. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.129104
[3]
Simon, B.E., Hoffman, S. and Kahn, S. (1973) Classification and Surgical Correction of Gynecomastia. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 51, 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197301000-00009
[4]
Basaria, S. (2010) Androgen Abuse in Athletes: Detection and Consequences. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 95, 1533-1543. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-1579
[5]
Koch, T., Bräuner, E.V., Busch, A.S., Hickey, M. and Juul, A. (2020) Marked Increase in Incident Gynecomastia: A 20-Year National Registry Study, 1998 to 2017. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 105, 3134-3140. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa440
[6]
Costanzo, P.R., Pacenza, N.A., Aszpis, S.M., Suárez, S.M., Pragier, U.M., Usher, J.G.S., et al. (2018) Clinical and Etiological Aspects of Gynecomastia in Adult Males: A Multicenter Study. BioMed Research International, 2018, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8364824
[7]
Acharya, S.V. (2021) Clinical Features, Presentation and Hormonal Parameters in Patients with Pubertal Gynecomastia. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 10, 648-651. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1987_20
[8]
de Barros, A.C.S.D. and de Castro Moura Sampaio, M. (2012) Gynecomastia: Physiopathology, Evaluation and Treatment. SaoPauloMedicalJournal, 130, 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802012000300009
[9]
Asal, M., Ewedah, M., Bassiony, M. and Abdelatif, A. (2023) Liposuction and Port Site Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: An Alternative Method for the Operative Treatment of Gynecomastia at Alexandria Main University Hospital. BMCSurgery, 23, Article No. 244. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02146-9
[10]
Yang, H.Z., Liang, F.Q., Feng, Y., Qiu, M.X., et al. (2023) Single Axillary Incision Reverse Sequence Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in the Management of Gynecomastia: Short-Term Cosmetic Outcomes, Surgical Safety, and Learning Curve of the Preliminary 156 Consecutive Procedures from a Prospective Cohort Study. AestheticPlasticSurgery, 48, 3120-3127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03727-y
[11]
Singamsetty, R., Rout, S.K., Giri, S.K., Panda, R., Behera, K.K. and Sable, M.N. (2022) Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 46, 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02611-x
[12]
Fayed, H. and Kholosy, H. (2018) Surgical Management of Gynecomastia: Choice and Outcome. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 37, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_111_17
[13]
Haddadfilho, D., Arruda, R. and Alonso, N. (2006) Treatment of Severe Gynecomastia (Grade III) by Resection of Periareolar Skin. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 26, 669-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2006.10.009
[14]
Brown, R.H., Chang, D.K., Siy, R. and Friedman, J. (2015) Trends in the Surgical Correction of Gynecomastia. SeminarsinPlasticSurgery, 29, 122-130. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1549053
[15]
Gusenoff, J.A., Coon, D. and Rubin, J.P. (2008) Pseudogynecomastia after Massive Weight Loss: Detectability of Technique, Patient Satisfaction, and Classification. PlasticandReconstructiveSurgery, 122, 1301-1311. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181881df4
[16]
Barone, M., Cogliandro, A., Tsangaris, E., Salzillo, R., Morelli Coppola, M., Ciarrocchi, S., et al. (2018) Treatment of Severe Gynecomastia after Massive Weight Loss: Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes Measured with the Italian Version of the Body-Q. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 42, 1506-1518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1232-9
[17]
McNamara, C.T., Nuzzi, L.C., Firriolo, J.M., Walsh, L.R., Massey, G.G., Malloy, S.M., etal. (2022) Complications and Quality of Life Following Gynecomastia Correction in Adolescents and Young Men. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 149, 1062e-1070e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000009089
[18]
Knoedler, L., Knoedler, S., Alfertshofer, M., Hansen, F.J., Schenck, T., Sofo, G., et al. (2024) Gynecomastia Surgery in 4996 Male Patients over 14 Years: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Trends, Predictive Risk Factors, and Short-Term Outcomes. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 48, 4642-4650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03927-0
[19]
Tolba, A.M. and Nasr, M. (2015) Surgical Treatment of Gynaecomastia: A Prospective Study in 75 Patients. Surgical Science, 6, 506-517. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2015.611073
[20]
Lee, S.R. and Lee, S.G. (2021) Reoperation Because of Dissatisfaction with the Aesthetic Results of Gynecomastia Surgery: Technical Considerations. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 45, 1444-1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02124-z
[21]
Innocenti, A., Melita, D. and Dreassi, E. (2022) Incidence of Complications for Different Approaches in Gynecomastia Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 46, 1025-1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02782-1