|
|
Modern Linguistics 2026
绿色语法研究的理论、实践与未来展望
|
Abstract:
本文系统探讨绿色语法的理论演进、实践应用及其未来发展方向。绿色语法作为生态语言学的核心分支,致力于批判语言中的人类中心主义与非生态意识形态,推动建立促进生态和谐的话语体系。本文通过梳理近十年相关研究,揭示其理论框架从早期对传统语法的生态批判,逐步发展为融合多学科视角的综合性分析模型。在实践层面,绿色语法已应用于教育、媒体话语重构及语料库驱动的批评性研究,有效促进了生态意识的培养与传播。然而,该领域仍面临诸如名词化现象的生态评价争议、学科定位模糊等挑战。展望未来,绿色语法应进一步深化与生态学、认知科学等学科的交叉融合,借助自然语言处理等技术拓展研究手段,并推动其在全球话语体系与多层次教育中的整合,从而为生态文明建设与社会治理提供更具操作性的语言学支持。
This paper systematically explores the theoretical evolution, practical application, and future development direction of green grammar. As a core branch of ecological linguistics, green grammar is dedicated to criticizing anthropocentrism and non-ecological ideologies in language and promoting the establishment of a discourse system that fosters ecological harmony. By reviewing relevant research over the past decade, this paper reveals that its theoretical framework has gradually evolved from early ecological critiques of traditional grammar to a comprehensive analytical model integrating multiple disciplinary perspectives. At the practical level, green grammar has been applied in education, media discourse reconstruction, and corpus-driven critical studies, effectively promoting the cultivation and dissemination of ecological awareness. However, the field still faces challenges such as disputes over the ecological evaluation of nominalization phenomena and ambiguous disciplinary positioning. Looking ahead, green grammar should further deepen its cross-disciplinary integration with ecology, cognitive science, and other fields, expand research methods through technologies like natural language processing, and promote its integration into global discourse systems and multi-level education, thereby providing more operational linguistic support for ecological civilization construction and social governance.
| [1] | 王晋军. 绿色语法与生态和谐[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(2): 57-60. |
| [2] | 程玉晓. 生态语言学中的绿色语法[J]. 校园英语, 2017(33): 219. |
| [3] | 左嘉欣. 绿色语法视域下习近平话语“人与自然生命共同体”建构研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安外国语大学, 2024. |
| [4] | 何伟, 安德鲁·格特力. 生态语言学的学科属性及其分支生态文体学——安德鲁·格特力教授访谈录[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 36(1): 1-7. |
| [5] | 赵奎英. “意识形态的欺骗”还是“绿色语法的资源”——“名词化”论争及其生态诗学意义的生态语言学再考察[J]. 文学理论前沿, 2014(1): 103-122. |
| [6] | 李珂. 绿色语法视角下生态关系的话语建构[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2024, 46(2): 104-118. |
| [7] | 胡壮麟. 科学理论新发现与语言学新思维——兼评Goatly协和语法[J]. 外语教学与研究, 1999(4): 1-6+77. |
| [8] | 周文娟. 生态语言学的新展望: 从绿色语法到生态语法[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 37(3): 247-253. |
| [9] | 闫丹. 生态素养教育融入大学英语课程的教学模式研究[J]. 现代英语, 2024(20): 25-27. |
| [10] | 刘姝昕. 生态话语分析路径: 大学英语教学中的生态素养教育探究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2021, 43(4): 33-44+57. |
| [11] | 曹逸群. 《中国日报》(2017)环境类新闻报道的生态话语分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南民族大学, 2019. |
| [12] | 沈园园. 从生态语言学视角研究COCA中energy的词汇搭配[J]. 文学教育(上), 2020(7): 170-171. |
| [13] | 刘姝昕. 绿色语法: 基于COCA的oil搭配研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 34(6): 27-32. |
| [14] | 范俊军. 生态语言学研究述评[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2005(2): 110-115. |