|
|
乡村旅游地农户生计适应性研究——以哈尔滨市元宝村为例
|
Abstract:
乡村旅游作为推动乡村振兴的重要引擎,其在促进农户生计转型与适应能力提升方面具有重要意义。基于可持续生计分析框架,本文构建了金融资本、社会资本、自然资本、人力资本、物质资本、心理认知6个维度层在内的乡村旅游地农户生计适应性评价指标体系。本文运用熵权法、综合指数法与障碍度模型对农户生计适应性水平进行测算,并分析影响因素。研究结果表明:(1) 农户生计类型共有3类,分别为旅游主导型、旅游兼营型与生计多样型。(2) 3种类型农户的生计适应性水平由高到低依次为生计多样型 > 旅游主导型 > 旅游兼营型。(3) 3类农户的影响因素有所不同。在旅游主导型农户中,农业收入对其生计适应性水平影响最大。旅游兼营型农户的障碍因子为年旅游收入和旅游经营房屋面积,这两类指标对其影响最大。生计多样型农户的主要障碍因子为年旅游收入。农户旅游经营房屋面积是三类农户的公共障碍因子,3类农户的公共障碍因子同时都分布在自然资本维度。因此,为提升农户生计适应性给出相应建议,可为乡村旅游地发展研究提供借鉴。
As an important engine for promoting rural revitalization, rural tourism plays a significant role in advancing farmers’ livelihood transformation and enhancing their adaptability. Based on the Sustainable Livelihood Framework (SLF), this study constructs an evaluation index system for farmers’ livelihood adaptability in rural tourism destinations, covering six-dimensional layers: financial capital, social capital, natural capital, human capital, physical capital, and psychological cognition. The entropy weight method, comprehensive index method, and obstacle degree model are employed to measure the level of farmers’ livelihood adaptability and analyze the influencing factors. The research results show that: (1) There are three types of farmers’ livelihoods, namely tourism-dominated type, tourism-supplementary type, and diversified livelihood type. (2) The livelihood adaptability levels of the three types of farmers, from highest to lowest, are in the order of diversified livelihood type > tourism-dominated type > tourism-supplementary type. (3) The influencing factors vary among the three types of farmers. For tourism-dominated farmers, agricultural income has the greatest impact on their livelihood adaptability. The obstacle factors for tourism-supplementary farmers are annual tourism income and the floor area of tourism operation premises, with these two indicators exerting the most significant influence. The main obstacle for diversified livelihood farmers is annual tourism income. The floor area of tourism operation premises is a common obstacle factor for all three types of farmers, and the common obstacle factors of the three types are all distributed in the natural capital dimension. Therefore, corresponding suggestions are proposed to improve farmers’ livelihood adaptability, which can provide a reference for the research on the development of rural tourism destinations.
| [1] | 吴吉林, 肖玉春, 刘水良, 等. 民族旅游乡村农户生计恢复力评价及障碍因子分析——以湘鄂武陵山片区10个村为例[J]. 经济地理, 2024, 44(1): 174-184. |
| [2] | 苏芳, 徐中民, 尚海洋. 可持续生计分析研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2009, 24(1): 61-69. |
| [3] | 赵雪雁, 赵海莉, 刘春芳. 石羊河下游农户的生计风险及应对策略——以民勤绿洲区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(5): 922-932. |
| [4] | 吴园庭雁, 杨君. 农户生计策略演变及其对农地利用的影响——基于湖南省291家农户的调查[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 18(2): 65-69. |
| [5] | 谢旭轩, 张世秋, 朱山涛. 退耕还林对农户可持续生计的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 46(3): 457-464. |
| [6] | 赵雪雁, 张丽, 江进德, 等. 生态补偿对农户生计的影响——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(3): 531-542. |
| [7] | 吴孔森, 杨新军, 尹莎. 环境变化影响下农户生计选择与可持续性研究——以民勤绿洲社区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(9): 141-149. |
| [8] | 尹莎, 陈佳, 吴孔森, 等. 干旱环境胁迫下农户适应性研究——基于民勤绿洲地区农户调查数据[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(5): 644-654. |
| [9] | 阎建忠, 吴莹莹, 张镱锂, 等. 青藏高原东部样带农牧民生计的多样化[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(2): 221-233. |
| [10] | 查尔斯∙罗伯特∙达尔文. 物种起源[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2021. |
| [11] | 贺爱琳, 杨新军, 陈佳, 等. 乡村旅游发展对农户生计的影响——以秦岭北麓乡村旅游地为例[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(12): 174-181. |
| [12] | 喻忠磊, 杨新军, 杨涛. 乡村农户适应旅游发展的模式及影响机制——以秦岭金丝峡景区为例[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1143-1156. |
| [13] | Liu, W., Xu, J., Li, J. and Li, S. (2019) Rural Households’ Poverty and Relocation and Settlement: Evidence from Western China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, Article 2609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142609 |
| [14] | 赵雪雁, 介永庆, 何小风, 等. 多重压力下重点生态功能区农户的生计适应性研究——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2020, 30(1): 140-149. |
| [15] | 李聪, 郭嫚嫚, 雷昊博. 从脱贫攻坚到乡村振兴: 易地扶贫搬迁农户稳定脱贫模式——基于本土化集中安置的探索实践[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 41(4): 58-67. |
| [16] | 何仁伟, 李光勤, 刘邵权, 等. 可持续生计视角下中国农村贫困治理研究综述[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2017, 27(11): 69-85. |
| [17] | 王新歌, 席建超. 大连金石滩旅游度假区当地居民生计转型研究[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(12): 2404-2413. |
| [18] | 何艳冰, 黄晓军, 杨新军. 快速城市化背景下城市边缘区失地农民适应性研究——以西安市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(2): 226-240. |