Impact of Artificial Intelligence Combined with Task-Driven Learning Methods on Teaching Effectiveness for Medical Interns: A Study in Respiratory Medicine
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced task-driven learning approach in respiratory medicine internship training compared to traditional teaching methods. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving 53 medical interns, divided into a control group (n = 27) receiving conventional teaching and an experimental group (n = 26) undergoing AI-enhanced task-driven instruction. The intervention integrated AI tools for clinical simulation with structured task-driven learning activities. Outcomes were assessed through standardized examinations (theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and case analysis) and comprehensive surveys (teaching satisfaction and self-evaluated competency). Results: The experimental group demonstrated statistically superior performance across all assessment domains compared to controls. Significantly higher scores were observed in theoretical knowledge (29.58 ± 3.38 vs. 27.11 ± 3.99, P = 0.02), practical skills (32.23 ± 3.13 vs. 26.56 ± 2.45, P < 0.001), and case analysis (14.85 ± 1.85 vs. 10.96 ± 1.95, P < 0.001). Satisfaction surveys revealed significantly more favorable responses from the experimental group (P < 0.001), with a higher proportion of “very satisfied” ratings. Self-assessment results indicated markedly improved perceived competency among experimental group participants (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The integration of AI tools with task-driven learning methodologies significantly enhances respiratory medicine internship training outcomes, improving both objective performance metrics and subjective learning experiences. This innovative approach offers a promising educational model for clinical training, though technical and ethical considerations require continued attention.
References
[1]
Ferkol, T. and Schraufnagel, D. (2014) The Global Burden of Respiratory Disease. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 11, 404-406. https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.201311-405ps
[2]
Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Foreman, K., Lim, S., Shibuya, K., Aboyans, V., et al. (2012) Global and Regional Mortality from 235 Causes of Death for 20 Age Groups in 1990 and 2010: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, 380, 2095-2128. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61728-0
[3]
Naghavi, M., Ong, K.L., Aali, A., Ababneh, H.S., Abate, Y.H., Abbafati, C., et al. (2024) Global Burden of 288 Causes of Death and Life Expectancy Decomposition in 204 Countries and Territories and 811 Subnational Locations, 1990-2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet, 403, 2100-2132. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00367-2
[4]
Fernandes, L. and Mesquita, A. (2018) Developing Knowledge and Clinical Competency in a Respiratory System-Based Practice of Final-Year Medical Students through a Novel Structured Bedside Teaching Module. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 7, 82. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_75_16
[5]
Wijsenbeek, M. and Cottin, V. (2020) Spectrum of Fibrotic Lung Diseases. New England Journal of Medicine, 383, 958-968. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra2005230
[6]
Solomon, Y. (2021) Comparison between Problem-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning: Effect on Nursing Students’ Immediate Knowledge Retention [Response to Letter]. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, 163-164. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s305514
[7]
Zhang, Q., Tang, X., Zhao, Y. and Wang, Z. (2023) Team-based Learning Vs. Lecture-Based Learning in Nursing: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 1044014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1044014
[8]
Alam, M., Hussain, J., Niazi, D.S. and Mushtaque, M. (2023) Historicity, Significance, and Implication of Adopting Task-Based Learning Framework in the Teaching of English: A Critical Review. Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 6, 152-156. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijll.2023.v06i02.009
[9]
Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Sun, X., Wu, L., Liu, G., et al. (2025) Enhancing Clinical Problem-Solving Skills in Cardiology Nursing Interns: A Randomized Controlled Study of Case-Based Learning and Task-Driven Learning. Nurse Education in Practice, 87, Article ID: 104449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104449
[10]
Lee, H. (2023) The Rise of ChatGPT: Exploring Its Potential in Medical Education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17, 926-931. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2270
[11]
Shaw, K., Henning, M.A. and Webster, C.S. (2025) Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Scoping Review of the Evidence for Efficacy and Future Directions. Medical Science Educator, 35, 1803-1816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02373-0
[12]
Kilroy, D.A. (2004) Problem Based Learning: Table 1. Emergency Medicine Journal, 21, 411-413. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2003.012435
[13]
Burgess, A., van Diggele, C., Roberts, C. and Mellis, C. (2020) Team-Based Learning: Design, Facilitation and Participation. BMC Medical Education, 20, Article No. 461. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y
[14]
Williams, B. (2005) Case Based Learning—A Review of the Literature: Is There Scope for This Educational Paradigm in Prehospital Education? Emergency Medicine Journal, 22, 577-581. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2004.022707
[15]
Kong, W., Ning, Y., Ma, T., Song, F., Mao, Y., Yang, C., et al. (2024) Experience of Undergraduate Nursing Students Participating in Artificial Intelligence + Project Task Driven Learning at Different Stages: A Qualitative Study. BMC Nursing, 23, Article No. 314. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01982-1
[16]
Kitamura, F.C. (2023) ChatGPT Is Shaping the Future of Medical Writing but Still Requires Human Judgment. Radiology, 307, e230171. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230171
