The global financial landscape is increasingly becoming interconnected, with financial markets exhibiting complex interdependencies. This increases the possibility of market risk spreading from one market to another, as market shocks often propagate across asset classes especially during periods of economic uncertainty. Failure to adequately capture the characteristics of univariate return series and the dependence structure between them, may lead to significant underestimation of the market risk forecasts. The standard multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity models assume that financial data follow a normal distribution, an assumption that fails to capture the heavy tails, skewness, and non-linear dependencies commonly observed in asset returns. Thus, this study models the dependency structures among a portfolio of financial asset classes and forecasts the Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall using multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Vine Copula approach. The multivariate GARCH model captures the dynamic volatilities and conditional correlations among assets, then vine copulas are used to model the remaining non-linear and tail dependence relationships between the standardized residuals. The empirical results indicated that the financial return series exhibit complex dependence patterns that vary across asset classes and evolve over time, reflecting the diverse behaviors of financial markets under varying economic conditions. Among the models considered, the constant conditional correlation stationary vine copula demonstrates superior performance in dependence modelling. Backtesting results for one-day-ahead Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall indicate that constant conditional correlation vine copula models significantly outperformed the constant and dynamic conditional correlation models with normal and Student-t innovations over a one-day horizon. In contrast, dynamic conditional correlation vine copula models generally exhibit poor predictive accuracy and fail to meet key backtesting tests. Overall, the empirical findings of this study indicated that the constant conditional correlation regular vine copula offers the most reliable and precise framework for modelling and forecasting portfolio market risk.
References
[1]
Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
[2]
Venter, P.J. and Maré, E. (2021) Univariate and Multivariate GARCH Models Applied to Bitcoin Futures Option Pricing. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14, Article 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14060261
[3]
Nhat, N.M. (2024) The Effectiveness of Multivariate GARCH Models in Portfolio Selection in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 33, 36-45.
[4]
Boman, V. (2019) A Comparison of Multivariate GARCH Models with Respect to Value at Risk. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1324825
[5]
Hung, J.C., Su, J.B., Chang, M.C. and Wang, Y.H. (2020) The Impact of Liquidity on Portfolio Value-at-Risk Forecasts. AppliedEconomics, 52, 242-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1644442
[6]
Sklar, M. (1959) Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges. Annales de l’ISUP, 8, 229-231.
[7]
Embrechts, P. (1999) Correlation: Pitfalls and Alternatives. Risk Magazine, 12, 69-71.
[8]
Jabalameli, F., Ghorbani, P. and Ahmadian, M. (2020) Risk Management in Oil Market: A Comparison between Multivariate GARCH Models and Copula-Based Models. Iranian Economic Review, 24, 489-513.
[9]
Joe, H. (1997) Multivariate Models and Multivariate Dependence Concepts. CRC Press.
[10]
Bedford, T. and Cooke, R.M. (2001) Probability Density Decomposition for Conditionally Dependent Random Variables Modeled by Vines. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 32, 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016725902970
[11]
Bedford, T. and Cooke, R.M. (2002) Vines—A New Graphical Model for Dependent Random Variables. The Annals of Statistics, 30, 1031-1068. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1031689016
[12]
Aas, K., Czado, C., Frigessi, A. and Bakken, H. (2009) Pair-Copula Constructions of Multiple Dependence. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 182-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.02.001
[13]
Czado, C., Brechmann, E.C. and Gruber, L. (2013) Selection of Vine Copulas. Copulae in Mathematical and Quantitative Finance: Proceedings of the Workshop, Cracow, 10-11 July 2013, 17-37.
[14]
Omari, C.O., Mwita, P.N. and Waititu, A.G. (2019) Conditional Dependence Modelling with Regular Vine Copulas. Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, 8, 97-133.
[15]
Evkaya, O., Gür, İ., Yıldırım Külekci, B. and Poyraz, G. (2024) Vine Copula Approach to Understand the Financial Dependence of the Istanbul Stock Exchange Index. ComputationalEconomics, 64, 2935-2980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10544-7
[16]
Bukre, Y.K., Gulden, P., Ismail, G. and Ozan, E. (2023) Dependence Analysis of the ise100 Banking Sector Using Vine Copula. Istanbul Journal of Economics, 73, 55-82.
[17]
Özgür, C. and Sarıkovanlık, V. (2021) An Application of Regular Vine Copula in Portfolio Risk Forecasting: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange. QuantitativeFinanceandEconomics, 5, 452-470. https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2021020
[18]
Bekhta, H. and Djelloul, B.A. (2021) Vine Copula: The New Approach for Modeling High Dimensional Dependencies-Application to Financial Data. Journal of the New Economy, 12, 752-771.
[19]
Wang, J., Yan, X., Cao, Y. and Wang, X. (2024) Multi-Scale Dependence and Risk Contagion among International Financial Markets Based on VMD-Vine Copula-Covar. Applied Economics, 57, 658-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2305615
[20]
Nagler, T., Krüger, D. and Min, A. (2022) Stationary Vine Copula Models for Multivariate Time Series. Journal of Econometrics, 227, 305-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.11.015
[21]
Czado, C., Bax, K., Sahin, Ö., Nagler, T., Min, A. and Paterlini, S. (2022) Vine Copula Based Dependence Modeling in Sustainable Finance. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 8, 309-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2022.11.003
[22]
Lee, T. and Long, X. (2009) Copula-Based Multivariate GARCH Model with Uncorrelated Dependent Errors. Journal of Econometrics, 150, 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.008
[23]
Sadraoui, T., Regaieg, R., Abdelghani, S., Moussa, W. and Mgadmi, N. (2021) The Dependence and Risk Spillover between Energy Market and BRICS Stock Markets: A Copula-MGARCH Model Approach. GlobalBusinessReview, 26, 1033-1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211049123
[24]
Chen, K.S. and Chang, S.H. (2022) Volatility Co-Movement between Bitcoin and Stablecoins: BEKK–GARCH and Copula–DCC–GARCH Approaches. Axioms, 11, Article 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11060259
[25]
Fülle, M.J. and Herwartz, H. (2024) Predicting Tail Risks by a Markov Switching MGARCH Model with Varying Copula Regimes. JournalofForecasting, 43, 2163-2186. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3117
[26]
Bollerslev, T. (1990) Modelling the Coherence in Short-Run Nominal Exchange Rates: A Multivariate Generalized Arch Model. TheReviewofEconomicsandStatistics, 72, 498-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109358
[27]
Jeantheau, T. (1998) Strong Consistency of Estimators for Multivariate Arch Models. Econometric Theory, 14, 70-86.
[28]
Engle, R. (2002) Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20, 339-350.
[29]
Billio, M. and Caporin, M. (2009) A generalized Dynamic Conditional Correlation model for portfolio risk evaluation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79, 2566-2578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2008.12.011
[30]
Cappiello, L., Engle, R.F. and Sheppard, K. (2006) Asymmetric Dynamics in the Correlations of Global Equity and Bond Returns. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4, 537-572. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbl005
[31]
Ruppert, D. and Matteson, D.S. (2011) Statistics and Data Analysis for Financial Engineering (Vol. 13). Springer.
[32]
Kupiec, P.H. (1995) Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models. The Journal of Derivatives, 3, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.3905/JOD.1995.407942
[33]
Christoffersen, P.F. (1998) Evaluating Interval Forecasts. International Economic Review, 39, 841-862. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527341
[34]
McNeil, A.J. and Frey, R. (2000) Estimation of Tail-Related Risk Measures for Heteroscedastic Financial Time Series: An Extreme Value Approach. Journal of Empirical Finance, 7, 271-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-5398(00)00012-8
[35]
Tibshirani, R.J. and Efron, B. (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, 57, 1-436.
[36]
Bayer, S. and Dimitriadis, T. (2022) Regression-Based Expected Shortfall Backtesting. JournalofFinancialEconometrics, 20, 437-471. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbaa013
[37]
Iqbal, R., Sorwar, G. and Choudhry, T. (2022) Vine Copula Approach for Multivariate and Multi-Day Ahead Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Forecasting. Advances in Financial Planning and Forecasting, 10, 163-196.