Marine plastic pollution is a pressing environmental threat, making reliable automation for underwater debris detection essential. However, vision systems trained on one dataset often degrade on new imagery due to domain shift. This study benchmarks models for cross-domain robustness, training convolutional neural networks—CNNs (MobileNetV2, ResNet-18, EfficientNet-B0) and vision transformers (DeiT-Tiny, ViT-B/16) on a labeled underwater dataset and then evaluates them on a balanced cross-domain test set built from plastic-positive images drawn from a different source and negatives from the training domain. Two zero-shot models were assessed, CLIP ViT-L/14 and Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash, that leverage pretraining to classify images without fine-tuning. Results show the lightweight MobileNetV2 delivers the strongest cross-domain performance (F1 ≈ 0.97), surpassing larger models. All fine-tuned models achieved high Precision (~99%), but differ in Recall, indicating varying sensitivity to plastic instances. Zero-shot CLIP is comparatively sensitive (Recall ~80%) yet prone to false positives (Precision ~56%), whereas Gemini exhibits the inverse profile (Precision ~99%, Recall ~81%). Error analysis highlights recurring confusions with coral textures, suspended particulates, and specular glare. Overall, compact CNNs with supervised training can generalize effectively for cross-domain underwater detection, while large pretrained vision-language models provide complementary strengths. Future work should explore hybrid strategies, such as small CNN backbones with foundation-model priors and domain-aware sampling, to combine high Precision with Recall across heterogeneous marine environments and reduce labeling burdens at scale.
References
[1]
Meng, J., Lang, L., Lu, Z., Tang, X. and He, H. (2024) Design and Implementation of Garbage Detection in Water Area Based on YOLOv5 Algorithm. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Public Management and Big Data Analysis, PMBDA 2023, Nanjing, 15-17 December 2023, 1. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.15-12-2023.2345400
[2]
Walia, J.S., Haridass, K. and Pavithra, L.K. (2025) Deep Learning Innovations for Underwater Waste Detection: An In-Depth Analysis. IEEEAccess, 13, 88917-88929. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3569344
[3]
Hipolito, J.C., Sarraga Alon, A., Amorado, R.V., Fernando, M.G.Z. and De Chavez, P.I.C. (2021) Detection of Underwater Marine Plastic Debris Using an Augmented Low Sample Size Dataset for Machine Vision System: A Deep Transfer Learning Approach. 2021 IEEE 19th Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), Kota Kinabalu, 23-25 November 2021, 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1109/scored53546.2021.9652703
[4]
Sánchez-Ferrer, A., Valero-Mas, J.J., Gallego, A.J. and Calvo-Zaragoza, J. (2023) An Experimental Study on Marine Debris Location and Recognition Using Object Detection. PatternRecognitionLetters, 168, 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2022.12.019
[5]
Saoud, L.S., Niu, Z., Sultan, A., Seneviratne, L. and Hussain, I. (2023) ADOD: Adaptive Domain-Aware Object Detection with Residual Attention for Underwater Environments. 2023 21st International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), Abu Dhabi, 5-8 December 2023, 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/icar58858.2023.10436502
[6]
Moorton, Z. (2024) State of the Art Applications of Deep Learning within Tracking and Detecting Marine Debris: A Survey. arXiv: 2403.18067.
[7]
Chen, R., Wu, J., Peng, Y., Li, Z. and Shang, H. (2023) Solving Floating Pollution with Deep Learning: A Novel SSD for Floating Objects Based on Continual Unsupervised Domain Adaptation. EngineeringApplicationsofArtificialIntelligence, 120, Article ID: 105857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105857
[8]
Radford, A., et al. (2021) Learning Transferable Visual Models from Natural Language Supervision. arXiv: 2103.00020.
[9]
Shukla, S. and Sonalkar, K. (2025) Can GPT-4o Mini and Gemini 2.0 Flash Predict Fine-Grained Fashion Product Attributes? A Zero-Shot Analysis. arXiv: 2507.09950.
[10]
van Lieshout, C., van Oeveren, K., van Emmerik, T. and Postma, E. (2020) Automated River Plastic Monitoring Using Deep Learning and Cameras. EarthandSpaceScience, 7, e2019EA000960. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019ea000960
[11]
Liu, J. and Zhou, Y. (2023) Marine Debris Detection Model Based on the Improved YOLOv5. 2023 3rd International Conference on Neural Networks, Information and Communication Engineering (NNICE), Guangzhou, 24-26 February 2023, 725-728. https://doi.org/10.1109/nnice58320.2023.10105682
[12]
Huangfu, Z., Li, S. and Yan, L. (2024) Ghost-YOLO V8: An Attention-Guided Enhanced Small Target Detection Algorithm for Floating Litter on Water Surfaces. Computers, Materials&Continua, 80, 3713-3731. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2024.054188
[13]
Sasaki, K., Sekine, T. and Emery, W. (2024) Enhancing the Detection of Coastal Marine Debris in Very High-Resolution Satellite Imagery via Unsupervised Domain Adaptation. IEEEJournalofSelectedTopicsinAppliedEarthObservationsandRemoteSensing, 17, 6014-6028. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2024.3364165
[14]
Kako, S., Kataoka, T., Matsuoka, D., Takahashi, Y., Hidaka, M., Aliani, S., et al. (2026) Remote Sensing and Image Analysis of Macro-Plastic Litter: A Review. MarinePollutionBulletin, 222, Article ID: 118630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118630
[15]
Kim, J.W., et al. (2021) Learning Transferable Visual Models from Natural Language Supervision. arXiv: 2103.00020.
[16]
Xue, B., Huang, B., Chen, G., Li, H. and Wei, W. (2021) Deep-Sea Debris Identification Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEEJournalofSelectedTopicsinAppliedEarthObservationsandRemoteSensing, 14, 8909-8921. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2021.3107853
[17]
Zhao, F., Huang, B., Wang, J., Shao, X., Wu, Q., Xi, D., et al. (2025) Seafloor Debris Detection Using Underwater Images and Deep Learning-Driven Image Restoration: A Case Study from Koh Tao, Thailand. MarinePollutionBulletin, 214, Article ID: 117710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117710
[18]
Shao, F., Chen, L., Shao, J., Ji, W., Xiao, S., Ye, L., et al. (2022) Deep Learning for Weakly-Supervised Object Detection and Localization: A Survey. Neurocomputing, 496, 192-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.095