Computed Tomography (CT) is widely used in medical diagnosis. Filtered Back Projection (FBP), a traditional analytical method, is commonly used in clinical CT to preserve high-frequency details but introduces streak artifacts in few-view data. In contrast, iterative reconstruction algorithms improve image quality by incorporating accurate models of imaging physics and noise. However, they often require explicit regularization or specialized network architectures, leading to complex optimization challenges. This paper proposes an iterative reconstruction algorithm based on detail transfer (DT), which requires the prior detail information extracted from the FBP-reconstructed image. Specifically, the detail information extracted from the FBP-reconstructed image is combined with the SART reconstruction results using mask-allocated weights to generate the initial value for the iterative reconstruction process. During the iterations, as characteristics of iterative algorithm, the low-frequency information is restored first and high-frequency information is gradually recovered, the extracted detail information is weighted with the iteratively reconstructed image to accelerate the restoration of high-frequency information. This approach speeds up the convergence of the algorithm. The iterative reconstruction algorithm adopts the Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART), and thus, the proposed method is referred to as SART-DT. Experimental results show that SART-DT effectively removes artifacts and restores details, offering superior reconstruction quality and better preservation of fine details compared to other methods.
References
[1]
Radon, J. (1983) Über die Bestimmung von Funktionen durch ihre Integralwerte längs gewisser Mannigfaltigkeiten. 71-86.
Flores, L., Vidal, V. and Verdú, G. (2015) Iterative Reconstruction from Few-View Projections. ProcediaComputerScience, 51, 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.188
[4]
Gordon, R., Bender, R. and Herman, G.T. (1970) Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques (ART) for Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Photography. JournalofTheoreticalBiology, 29, 471-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(70)90109-8
[5]
Andersen, A. (1984) Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the ART Algorithm. UltrasonicImaging, 6, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-7346(84)90008-7
[6]
Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Ma, X. and Xu, Y. (2022) A Content-Adaptive Unstructured Grid Based Regularized CT Reconstruction Method with a SART-Type Preconditioned Fixed-Point Proximity Algorithm. InverseProblems, 38, Article ID: 035005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ac490f
[7]
Chee, G., O’Connell, D., Yang, Y.M., Singhrao, K., Low, D.A. and Lewis, J.H. (2019) McSART: An Iterative Model-Based, Motion-Compensated SART Algorithm for CBCT Reconstruction. PhysicsinMedicine&Biology, 64, Article ID: 095013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab07d6
[8]
Greffier, J., Frandon, J., Larbi, A., Beregi, J.P. and Pereira, F. (2019) CT Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms: A Task-Based Image Quality Assessment. EuropeanRadiology, 30, 487-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06359-6
[9]
Stiller, W. (2018) Basics of Iterative Reconstruction Methods in Computed Tomography: A Vendor-Independent Overview. EuropeanJournalofRadiology, 109, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.025
[10]
Huang, Z., Ye, S., McCann, M.T. and Ravishankar, S. (2023) Model-Based Reconstruction with Learning: From Unsupervised to Supervised and Beyond. In: Ye, J.C., Eldar, Y.C. and Unser, M., Eds., DeepLearningforBiomedicalImageReconstruction, Cambridge University Press, 28-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042529.005
[11]
Kumar, D., Parkinson, D.Y. and Donatelli, J.J. (2024) tomoCAM: Fast Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction via GPU Acceleration and Non-Uniform Fast Fourier Transforms. JournalofSynchrotronRadiation, 31, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1107/s1600577523008962
[12]
Song, B., Shen, L. and Xing, L. (2023) PINER: Prior-Informed Implicit Neural Representation Learning for Test-Time Adaptation in Sparse-View CT Reconstruction. 2023 IEEE/CVFWinterConferenceonApplicationsofComputerVision (WACV), Waikoloa, 2-7 January 2023, 1928-1937. https://doi.org/10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00197
[13]
Lei, J. and Liu, Q.B. (2022) Semi-Supervised Learning-Assisted Imaging Method for Electrical Capacitance Tomography. AppliedMathematicalModelling, 106, 126-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2022.01.027
[14]
He, K., Sun, J. and Tang, X. (2013) Guided Image Filtering. IEEETransactionsonPatternAnalysisandMachineIntelligence, 35, 1397-1409. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2012.213
[15]
Petschnigg, G., Szeliski, R., Agrawala, M., Cohen, M., Hoppe, H. and Toyama, K. (2004) Digital Photography with Flash and No-Flash Image Pairs. ACMTransactionsonGraphics, 23, 664-672. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015706.1015777
[16]
Qu, G., Wang, C. and Jiang, M. (2009) Necessary and Sufficient Convergence Conditions for Algebraic Image Reconstruction Algorithms. IEEETransactionsonImageProcessing, 18, 435-440. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2008.2008076
[17]
Han, G., Qu, G. and Jiang, M. (2016) Relaxation Strategy for the Landweber Method. SignalProcessing, 125, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.01.010
[18]
Censor, Y., Elfving, T., Herman, G.T. and Nikazad, T. (2008) On Diagonally Relaxed Orthogonal Projection Methods. SIAMJournalonScientificComputing, 30, 473-504. https://doi.org/10.1137/050639399
[19]
Shashua, A. and Riklin-Raviv, T. (2001) The Quotient Image: Class-Based Re-Rendering and Recognition with Varying Illuminations. IEEETransactionsonPatternAnalysisandMachineIntelligence, 23, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.908964
[20]
Liu, Z., Shan, Y. and Zhang, Z. (2001) Expressive Expression Mapping with Ratio Images. Proceedingsofthe 28th Annual ConferenceonComputer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, 12-17 August 2001, 271-276. https://doi.org/10.1145/383259.383289
[21]
Yu, H. and Wang, G. (2010) A Soft-Threshold Filtering Approach for Reconstruction from a Limited Number of Projections. PhysicsinMedicineandBiology, 55, 3905-3916. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/13/022
[22]
Yu, W., Wang, C., Nie, X., Huang, M. and Wu, L. (2017) Image Reconstruction for Few-View Computed Tomography Based on ℓ0 Sparse Regularization. ProcediaComputerScience, 107, 808-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.178
[23]
Ji, D., Qu, G. and Liu, B. (2016) Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique Based on Guided Image Filtering. OpticsExpress, 24, Article No. 15897. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.24.015897
[24]
Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R. and Simoncelli, E.P. (2004) Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. IEEETransactionsonImageProcessing, 13, 600-612. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2003.819861
[25]
Storath, M., Weinmann, A., Frikel, J. and Unser, M. (2015) Joint Image Reconstruction and Segmentation Using the Potts Model. InverseProblems, 31, Article ID: 025003. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/31/2/025003
[26]
Tang, K., Yang, J. and Wang, J. (2014) Investigating Haze-Relevant Features in a Learning Framework for Image Dehazing. 2014 IEEEConferenceonComputerVisionandPatternRecognition, Columbus, 23-28 June 2014, 2995-3002. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2014.383