全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Improved Generation-Specific Airway Patency in 3D Printed Models through Layer and Exposure Time Modifications

DOI: 10.4236/ijcm.2025.1610027, PP. 395-402

Keywords: 3D Printing, Airway Models, Bronchoscopy Simulation, Resin Printing Optimization, Interventional Pulmonology

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Three-dimensional (3D) printing offers transformative potential for interventional pulmonology by enabling patient-specific models for simulation, surgical planning, and device development. However, accurate reproduction of the multi-generational airway tree remains limited by printing artifacts and lumen distortion, particularly in resin-based methods. This pilot study evaluated whether modifying resin printing parameters could improve airway patency and anatomical fidelity. Twenty identical human airway models were fabricated with an Elegoo Saturn 8K printer: ten with default manufacturer settings and ten with a modified protocol incorporating reduced layer height, fewer bottom layers, shortened standard exposure time, and prolonged bottom-layer exposure. Bronchoscopic inspection revealed that default settings produced incomplete carinas and collapsed second- and third-generation bronchi, whereas the modified protocol yielded smoother lumens, sharply defined carinas, and continuous branching to third-generation airways. Quantitative scoring confirmed reduced surface artifacts and greater branch continuity in the modified group. These findings demonstrate that tailored resin printing parameters enhance fidelity and functional utility of airway models. Such improvements support applications in high-fidelity training, preoperative planning, patient-specific device design, and computational studies. Parameter optimization may expand the translational role of 3D printing in pulmonary medicine by ensuring models are not only visually accurate but also dynamically functional.

References

[1]  Vaezi, M., Seitz, H. and Yang, S. (2012) A Review on 3D Micro-Additive Manufacturing Technologies. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67, 1721-1754.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4605-2
[2]  Klein, G.T., Lu, Y. and Wang, M.Y. (2018) 3D Printing and Neurosurgery-Ready for Prime Time? World Neurosurgery, 109, 153-157.
[3]  Choi, J.W., Kim, G., Hong, S., An, J.H., Kim, B. and Ha, C.W. (2022) Sequential Process Optimization for a Digital Light Processing System to Minimize Trial and Error. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 13553.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17841-5
[4]  Martelli, N., Serrano, C., van den Brink, H., Pineau, J., Prognon, P., Borget, I., et al. (2016) Advantages and Disadvantages of 3-Dimensional Printing in Surgery: A Systematic Review. Surgery, 159, 1485-1500.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.017
[5]  He, Y., Xue, G.H. and Fu, J.Z. (2014) Fabrication of Low-Cost Soft Tissue Prostheses with the Desktop 3D Printer. Scientific Reports, 4, Article No. 6973.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06973
[6]  Tumbleston, J.R., Shirvanyants, D., Ermoshkin, N., Janusziewicz, R., Johnson, A.R., Kelly, D., et al. (2015) Continuous Liquid Interface Production of 3D Objects. Science, 347, 1349-1352.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa2397
[7]  Ventola, C.L. (2014) Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses. P&T: A Peer-Reviewed Journal for Formulary Management, 39, 704-711.
[8]  Morrison, R.J., Hollister, S.J., Niedner, M.F., Mahani, M.G., Park, A.H., Mehta, D.K., et al. (2020) Mitigation of Tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-Printed Personalized Medical Devices in Pediatric Patients. Science Translational Medicine, 12, eaaw6934.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133