This article develops a neurosociological decision-making model integrating economic sociology, social neuroscience, and Dual-Process cognitive theories. It challenges Rational Choice Theory (RCT) from neoclassical economics by arguing that rational behavior cannot be reduced to utility maximization based on stable preferences and perfect information. Drawing on economic sociology critiques, the paper highlights the social embeddedness of economic action, the constitutive role of cultural norms, and institutional influences. Behavioral economics and social neuroscience findings further demonstrate that emotions are central, not peripheral, to decision-making. The framework builds on Dual-Process models—distinguishing fast, intuitive (System 1) from slow, deliberative (System 2) processes—and extends them by including socially and culturally acquired knowledge. Central to the model is conation, defined as the neurocognitive capacity for adaptive, goal-directed action amid emotional and contextual complexity. Rationality is reconceptualized as a dynamic, context-dependent process arising from the interaction of neural mechanisms and socio-cultural environments. The article proposes three testable hypotheses linking neural activity patterns to moral and rational evaluations across social contexts. By integrating cognitive neuroscience with sociological theory, it establishes a theoretical and methodological foundation for neurosociology and offers a multidisciplinary approach to understanding the cognitive architecture of moral and economic behavior.
References
[1]
Abramson, C. M. (2012). From “Either-Or” to “When and How”: A Context-Dependent Model of Culture in Action. JournalfortheTheoryofSocialBehaviour,42, 155-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00484.x
[2]
Agnoli, F. (1991). Development of Judgmental Heuristics and Logical Reasoning: Training Counteracts the Representativeness Heuristic. CognitiveDevelopment,6, 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(91)90036-d
[3]
Albrecht, K., Volz, K. G., Sutter, M., Laibson, D. I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2011). What Is for Me Is Not for You: Brain Correlates of Intertemporal Choice for Self and Other. SocialCognitiveandAffectiveNeuroscience,6, 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq046
[4]
Bailey, C. E. (2007). Cognitive Accuracy and Intelligent Executive Function in the Brain and in Business. AnnalsoftheNewYorkAcademyofSciences,1118, 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1412.011
[5]
Bandelj, N. (2012). Relational Work and Economic Sociology. Politics&Society,40, 175-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329212441597
[6]
Bandelj, N. (2020). Relational Work in the Economy. AnnualReviewofSociology,46, 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054719
[7]
Barrett, L. F. (2017). HowEmotionsAreMade:TheSecretLife of the Brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
[8]
Berg, N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2010). As-if Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise? History of Economic Ideas, 18, 133-165. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1677168
[9]
Besbris, M. (2016). Romancing the Home: Emotions and the Interactional Creation of Demand in the Housing Market. Socio-EconomicReview,14, 461-482.
[10]
Block, F., & Evans, P. (2005). 22. The State and the Economy. In TheHandbookofEconomicSociology (2nd ed., pp. 505-526). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835584.505
[11]
Bonnefon, J. F. (2018). The Pros and Cons of Identifying Critical Thinking with System 2 Processing. Topoi,37, 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9375-2
[12]
Bourdieu, P. (1977). OutlineofaTheoryofPractice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812507
[13]
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction:ASocialCritique of the Judgment of Taste. Harvard University Press.
[14]
Bourdieu, P. (1990). TheLogic of Practice. Polity Press.
[15]
Brett, G., & Miles, A. (2021). Who Thinks How? Social Patterns in Reliance on Automatic and Deliberate Cognition. SociologicalScience,8, 96-118. https://doi.org/10.15195/v8.a6
[16]
Bursell, M., & Olsson, F. (2021). Do We Need Dual-Process Theory to Understand Implicit Bias? A Study of the Nature of Implicit Bias against Muslims. Poetics,87, Article ID: 101549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101549
[17]
Camerer, C. F. (2007). Neuroeconomics: Using Neuroscience to Make Economic Predictions. TheEconomicJournal,117, C26-C42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02033.x
[18]
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2004a). Neuroeconomics: Why Economics Needs Brains. TheScandinavianJournalofEconomics,106, 555-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00377.x
[19]
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (2004b). Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton University Press.
[20]
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. JournalofEconomicLiterature,43, 9-64. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843
[21]
Cerulo, K. A. (2018). Scents and Sensibility: Olfaction, Sense-Making, and Meaning Attribution. AmericanSociologicalReview,83, 361-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418759679
[22]
Cerulo, K. A. (2019). Embodied Cognition: Sociology’s Role in Bridging Mind, Brain, and Body. In W. Brekhus, & G. Ignatow (Eds.), TheOxfordHandbookofCognitiveSociology (pp. 81-100). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190273385.013.5
[23]
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-02377-000
[24]
Cushman, F. (2020). Rationalization Is Rational. BehavioralandBrainSciences,43, E28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x19001730
[25]
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error:Emotion,Reason and the HumanBrain. Putnam.
[26]
Dequech, D. (2003). Cognitive and Cultural Embeddedness: Combining Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology. JournalofEconomicIssues,37, 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2003.11506594
[27]
Dequech, D. (2006). Institutions and Norms in Institutional Economics and Sociology. JournalofEconomicIssues,40, 473-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506926
[28]
DiMaggio, P. (1994). Culture and Economy. In N. Smelser, & R. Swedberg (Eds.), HandbookofEconomicSociology (pp. 27-57). Princeton University Press and Russell Sage. https://nyuscholars.nyu.edu/en/publications/culture-and-economy
[29]
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and Cognition. AnnualReviewofSociology,23, 263-287. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
[30]
DiMaggio, P. (2013). Why Cognitive (and Cultural) Sociology Needs. Cognitive Psychology. In K. A. Cerulo (Ed.), Culture in Mind (pp. 271-278). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203904701
[31]
DiMaggio, P. (2019). Cultural Aspects of Economic action and Organization. In BeyondtheMarketplace (pp. 113-136). Taylor and Francis.
[32]
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. AmericanSociologicalReview,48, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
[33]
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. AmericanJournalofSociology,103, 281-317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
[34]
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. PerspectivesonPsychologicalScience,8, 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
[35]
Evans, J. S. B., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality and Reasoning. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203027677
[36]
Evans, P. B. (1995). EmbeddedAutonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821723
[37]
Facione, P. A. (1990). CriticalThinking:AStatement of ExpertConsensus for Purposes of EducationalAssessment and Instruction. California Academic Press.
[38]
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks and Benefits. JournalofBehavioralDecisionMaking,13, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::aid-bdm333>3.0.co;2-s
[39]
Friedman, M. (1953). EssaysinPositiveEconomics. University of Chicago Press.
[40]
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind:TheTheory of MultipleIntelligences. Basic Books.
[41]
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky. PsychologicalReview,103, 592-596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.592
[42]
Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Tools of Bounded Rationality. In D. Koehler, & N. Harvey (Eds.), BlackwellHandbook of Judgment and DecisionMaking (pp. 62-88). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937.ch4
[43]
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality. PsychologicalReview,103, 650-669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.650
[44]
Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How Mental Systems Believe. AmericanPsychologist,46, 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.46.2.107
[45]
Glimcher, P. W., & Fehr, E. (2013). Neuroeconomics:DecisionMakingandtheBrain (2nd ed.). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-05512-6.
[46]
Glimcher, P. W., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Neuroeconomics: The Consilience of Brain and Decision. Science,306, 447-452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102566
[47]
Goldberg, E. (2001). TheExecutiveBrain:FrontalLobes and the CivilizedMind. Oxford University Press.
[48]
Granovetter, M. (1983). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. SociologicalTheory,1, 201-233. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
[49]
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. AmericanJournalofSociology,91, 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
[50]
Granovetter, M. (2017). SocietyandEconomy: Framework and Principles. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674977792
[51]
Granovetter, M. (2018). The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. In M. Granovetter (Ed.), TheSociologyofEconomicLife (3rd ed., pp. 46-61). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494338-4
[52]
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. AmericanJournalofSociology,78, 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
[53]
Grayot, J. D. (2020). Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: A Critical Review. ReviewofPhilosophyandPsychology,11, 105-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-019-00446-9
[54]
Guetzkow, J., & Ben-Zvi, K. (2017). From Subcultures to Toolkits: Ethnicity and Violence in Israeli Prisons. SocialForces, 95, 1237-1259. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow099
[55]
Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. PsychologicalReview,108, 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814
[56]
Harris, S. (2010). TheMoralLandscape:HowScienceCanDetermineHumanValues. Free Press.
[57]
Hirshleifer, D. (2015). Behavioral Finance. AnnualReviewofFinancialEconomics,7, 133-159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-092214-043752
[58]
Ignatow, G. (2007). Theories of Embodied Knowledge: New Directions for Cultural and Cognitive Sociology? JournalfortheTheoryofSocialBehaviour,37, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00328.x
[59]
Ignatow, G. (2009). Culture and Embodied Cognition: Moral Discourses in Internet Support Groups for Overeaters. SocialForces,88, 643-669. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0262
[60]
Jussim, L. (2012). SocialPerceptionandSocialReality: Why Accuracy Dominates Bias and Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195366600.001.0001
[61]
Kahneman, D. (2003a). Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. AmericanEconomicReview,93, 1449-1475. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392
[62]
Kahneman, D. (2003b). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. AmericanPsychologist,58, 697-720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697
[63]
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking,Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
[64]
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases:ThePsychology of IntuitiveJudgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004
[65]
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. In L. C. MacLean, & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making (pp. 99-127). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0006
[66]
Kahneman, D., Slovic, S. P., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). JudgmentunderUncertainty:HeuristicsandBiases. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477
[67]
Keren, G. (2013). A Tale of Two Systems: A Scientific Advance or a Theoretical Stone Soup? Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013). PerspectivesonPsychologicalScience,8, 257-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613483474
[68]
Keren, G., & Schul, Y. (2009). Two Is Not Always Better than One: A Critical Evaluation of Two-System Theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 533-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01164.x
[69]
Leschziner, V. (2015). AttheChef’sTable: Culinary Creativity in Elite Restaurants. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804787970.001.0001
[70]
Leschziner, V. (2019). Dual-Process Models in Sociology. In W. Brekhus, & G. Ignatow (Eds.), TheOxfordHandbookofCognitiveSociology (pp. 169-191). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190273385.013.10
[71]
Leschziner, V., & Brett, G. (2019). Beyond Two Minds: Cognitive, Embodied, and Evaluative Processes in Creativity. SocialPsychologyQuarterly,82, 340-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272519851791
[72]
Leschziner, V., & Green, A. I. (2013). Thinking about Food and Sex: Deliberate Cognition in the Routine Practices of a Field. SociologicalTheory,31, 116-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113489806
[73]
Lindenberg, S. (2023). Social Rationality and Economic Sociology. In M. Zafirovski (Ed.) The Routledge International Handbook of Economic Sociology (pp. 247-270). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367817152-15
[74]
Lizardo, O. (2004). The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu’s Habitus. JournalfortheTheoryofSocialBehaviour,34, 375-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00255.x
[75]
Lizardo, O. (2007). “Mirror Neurons,” Collective Objects and the Problem of Transmission: Reconsidering Stephen Turner’s Critique of Practice Theory. JournalfortheTheoryofSocialBehaviour,37, 319-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00340.x
[76]
Lizardo, O. (2009). Formalism, Behavioral Realism and the Interdisciplinary Challenge in Sociological Theory. JournalfortheTheoryofSocialBehaviour,39, 39-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00393.x
[77]
Lizardo, O. (2017). Improving Cultural Analysis: Considering Personal Culture in Its Declarative and Nondeclarative Modes. AmericanSociologicalReview,82, 88-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416675175
[78]
Lizardo, O., & Strand, M. (2010). Skills, Toolkits, Contexts and Institutions: Clarifying the Relationship between Different Approaches to Cognition in Cultural Sociology. Poetics,38, 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.003
[79]
Lizardo, O., Mowry, R., Sepulvado, B., Stoltz, D. S., Taylor, M. A., Van Ness, J. et al. (2016). What Are Dual Process Models? Implications for Cultural Analysis in Sociology. SociologicalTheory,34, 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275116675900
[80]
Martin, J. L. (2010). Life’s a Beach but You’re an Ant, and Other Unwelcome News for the Sociology of Culture. Poetics,38, 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.004
[81]
McClure, S. M., Ericson, K. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2007). Time Discounting for Primary Rewards. TheJournalofNeuroscience,27, 5796-5804. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4246-06.2007
[82]
Mencken, F. C., & Froese, P. (2019). Gun Culture in Action. SocialProblems,66, 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx040
[83]
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory. BehavioralandBrainSciences,34, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x10000968
[84]
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. AmericanJournalofSociology,83, 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
[85]
Miles, A. (2014). Addressing the Problem of Cultural Anchoring: An Identity-Based Model of Culture in Action. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 210-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514524062
[86]
Miles, A., Charron-Chénier, R., & Schleifer, C. (2019). Measuring Automatic Cognition: Advancing Dual-Process Research in Sociology. AmericanSociologicalReview,84, 308-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419832497
[87]
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function. AnnualReviewofNeuroscience,24, 167-202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
[88]
Mizrachi, N., Drori, I., & Anspach, R. R. (2007). Repertoires of Trust: The Practice of Trust in a Multinational Organization Amid Political Conflict. AmericanSociologicalReview,72, 143-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200107
[89]
Moore, R. (2017). Fast or Slow: Sociological Implications of Measuring Dual-Process Cognition. SociologicalScience,4, 196-223. https://doi.org/10.15195/v4.a9
[90]
Mugg, J. (2016). The Dual-Process Turn: How Recent Defenses of Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning Fail. PhilosophicalPsychology,29, 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2015.1078458
[91]
Nofsinger, J. R. (2017). ThePsychology of Investing (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315230856
[92]
Osman, M. (2004). An Evaluation of Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning. PsychonomicBulletin&Review,11, 988-1010. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196730
[93]
Oullier, O. (2013). Behavioural Insights Are Vital to Policy-Making. Nature,501, 463-463. https://doi.org/10.1038/501463a
[94]
Over, D. (2004). Rationality and the Normative/Descriptive Distinction. In D. J. Koehler, & N. Harvey, (Eds.), BlackwellHandbook of Judgment and DecisionMaking (pp. 247-270). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937.ch1
[95]
Parsons, T., & Shils, E. (1951). Toward a GeneralTheory of Action. Harper Torchbooks. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674863507
[96]
Peterson, R. L. (2010). Neuroeconomics and Neurofinance. In H. Kent Baker, & K. Nofsinger (Eds.), BehavioralFinance:Investors,Corporations, and Markets (pp. 73-93). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118258415.ch5
[97]
Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (2000). Conation: A Neglected Aspect of Neuropsychological Functioning. ArchivesofClinicalNeuropsychology,15, 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/15.5.443
[98]
Ritter, J. R. (2003). Behavioral Finance. Pacific-BasinFinanceJournal,11, 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-538x(03)00048-9
[99]
Rosen, E. (2017). Horizontal Immobility: How Narratives of Neighborhood Violence Shape Housing Decisions. AmericanSociologicalReview,82, 270-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417695841
[100]
Rossman, G. (2014). Obfuscatory Relational Work and Disreputable Exchange. SociologicalTheory,32, 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275114523418
[101]
Samuels, R., & Stich, S. (2004). Rationality and Psychology. In A. R. Mele, & P. Rawling (Eds.), TheOxfordHandbookofRationality (pp. 279-298). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195145399.003.0015
[102]
Samuels, R., Stich, S., & Bishop, M. (2012). Ending the Rationality Wars. In S. Stich (Ed.), Collected Papers, Volume 2: Knowledge, Rationality, and Morality, 1978-2010 (pp. 191-223). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199733477.003.0009
[103]
Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave:TheBiology of Humans at OurBest and Worst. Penguin.
[104]
Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional Theory Contributing to Atheoretical Research Program. In K. G. Smith, & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), GreatMindsinManagement: The Process of Theory Development (pp. 460-484). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199276813.003.0022
[105]
Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1994). InstitutionalEnvironments and Organizations:StructuralComplexity and Individualism. Sage.
[106]
Sewell, W. H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. AmericanJournalofSociology,98, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1086/229967
[107]
Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality. AnnualReviewofPsychology,53, 491-517. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135213
[108]
Simon, H. (1982). Models of BoundedRationality. MIT Press.
[109]
Smith, V. L. (2005). Behavioral Economics Research and the Foundations of Economics. TheJournalofSocio-Economics,34, 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.003
[110]
Somers, M. R., & Block, F. (2005). From Poverty to Perversity: Ideas, Markets, and Institutions over 200 Years of Welfare Debate. AmericanSociologicalReview,70, 260-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000204
[111]
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). WhoIsRational?Studies of IndividualDifferences in Reasoning. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603432
[112]
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? BehavioralandBrainSciences,23, 645-665. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00003435
[113]
Stein, A. (2013). Are People Probabilistically Challenged? MichiganLawReview,111, 855-876.
[114]
Stein, E. (1996). WithoutGoodReason:TheRationalityDebate in Philosophy and CognitiveScience. Clarendon Press.
[115]
Stoltz, D. S., & Lizardo, O. (2018). Deliberate Trust and Intuitive Faith: A Dual-Process Model of Reliance. JournalfortheTheoryofSocialBehaviour,48, 230-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12160
[116]
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. AmericanSociologicalReview,51, 273-286. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521
[117]
Swidler, A. (2001). TalkofLove: How Culture Matters. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226230665.001.0001
[118]
Swidler, A. (2008). Comment on Stephen Vaisey’s “Socrates, Skinner, and Aristotle: Three Ways of Thinking about Culture in Action”. SociologicalForum,23, 614-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00080.x
[119]
Taleb, N. N. (2004). Fooled by Randomness:TheHiddenRole of Chance in Life and in the Markets (2nd ed.). Thompson Texere.
[120]
TenHouten, W. D. (2013). A Neurosociological Model of Weberian, Instrumental Rationality: Its Cognitive, Conative, and Neurobiological Foundations. In D. Franks, & J. Turner (Eds.), HandbooksofSociologyandSocialResearch (pp. 207-230). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8_15
[121]
Thaler, R. H. (1993). Advances in BehavorialFinance. Russell Sage.
[122]
Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving:TheMaking of BehavioralEconomics. WW Norton & Company.
[123]
Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future. AmericanEconomicReview,106, 1577-1600. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577
[124]
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge:ImprovingDecisions about Health,Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.
[125]
Tomer, J. F. (2007). What Is Behavioral Economics? TheJournalofSocio-Economics,36, 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.007
[126]
Tubaro, P. (2021). Disembedded or Deeply Embedded? A Multi-Level Network Analysis of Online Labour Platforms. Sociology,55, 927-944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520986082
[127]
Turner, J. H. (2021). OnHumanNature:TheBiology and Sociology of WhatMadeUsHuman. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094500
[128]
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in Judgments Reveal Some Heuristics of Thinking under Uncertainty. Science,185, 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
[129]
Uzzi, B. (1996). The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. AmericanSociologicalReview,61, 674-698. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096399
[130]
Vaisey, S. (2008). Reply to Ann Swidler. SociologicalForum,23, 619-622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00081.x
[131]
Vaisey, S. (2008). Socrates, Skinner, and Aristotle: Three Ways of Thinking about Culture in Action. SociologicalForum,23, 603-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00079.x
[132]
Vaisey, S. (2009). Motivation and Justification: A Dual-process Model of Culture in Action. AmericanJournalofSociology,114, 1675-1715. https://doi.org/10.1086/597179
[133]
Vaisey, S. (2013). Is Interviewing Compatible with the Dual-Process Model of Culture? AmericanJournalofCulturalSociology,2, 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2013.8
[134]
Vaisey, S., & Frye, M. (2019) The Old One-Two: Preserving Analytical Dualism in Cognitive Sociology. In W. H. Brekhus, & G. Ignatow (Eds.). TheOxfordHandbook of CognitiveSociology (pp. 101-114). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190273385.013.6
[135]
Vaisey, S., & Lizardo, O. (2010). Can Cultural Worldviews Influence Network Composition? SocialForces,88, 1595-1618. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0009
[136]
Venkata Ramana, S., Reddy, Y. S., Ram, P. P., & Rao, S. S. (2024). Neuro Economics and Financial Decision-Making: Bridging the Gap with Behavioral Finance. EducationalAdministration:TheoryandPractice, 30, 1035-1044. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.3006
[137]
Vila-Henninger, L. A. (2015). Toward Defining the Causal Role of Consciousness: Using Models of Memory and Moral Judgment from Cognitive Neuroscience to Expand the Sociological Dual-Process Model. JournalfortheTheoryofSocialBehaviour,45, 238-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12068
[138]
Vila-Henninger, L. A. (2020). A Theory of “Popular Political Legitimation”: A Dual-Process Model Approach to Legitimation and Political Socialization. JournalfortheTheoryofSocialBehaviour,50, 490-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12255
[139]
Vila-Henninger, L. A. (2021b). Theory: A Sociological Dual-Process Model of Outcomes. In L. A. Vila-Henninger (Ed.), Socialization,MoralJudgment,andAction: A Sociological Dual-Process Model of Outcomes (pp. 93-114). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88278-5_5
[140]
Vila-Henninger, L. A. (2021а). A Dual-Process Model of Economic Behavior: Using Culture and Cognition, Economic Sociology, Behavioral Economics, and Neuroscience to Reconcile Moral and Self-Interested Economic Action. SociologicalForum,36, 1271-1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12763
[141]
Volz, K. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). The Brain Is Not “As-If”—Taking Stock of the Neuroscientific Approach on Decision Making. In T. D. Papageorgiou, G. I. Christopoulos, & S. M. Smirnakis (Eds.), AdvancedBrainNeuroimagingTopicsinHealthandDisease—MethodsandApplications (pp. 573-603). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/58273
[142]
Volz, K. G., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008). Can Neuroscience Tell a Story about Intuition? In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuitionin Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 71-87). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-15735-005
[143]
Weber, M. (1946). [1922-3]. The Social Psychology of the World Religions. In H. Gerth, & W. Mills, (Eds.), FromMaxWeber:Essays in Sociology (pp. 267-301). Oxford University Press.
[144]
Wendel, S. (2020). Designing for BehaviorChange:ApplyingPsychology and BehavioralEconomics. O’Reilly Media.
[145]
Wherry, F. F., Seefeldt, K. S., & Alvarez, A. S. (2019). To Lend or Not to Lend to Friends and Kin: Awkwardness, Obfuscation, and Negative Reciprocity. SocialForces, 98, 753-793. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy127
[146]
Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies:Analysis and AntitrustImplications:AStudy in the Economics of InternalOrganization. The Free Press.
[147]
Winchester, D. (2016). A Hunger for God: Embodied Metaphor as Cultural Cognition in Action. Social Forces, 95, 585-606. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow065
[148]
Zelizer, V. A. (1994). Pricing the PricelessChild:TheChangingSocialValue of Children. Princeton University Press.
[149]
Zelizer, V. A. (2000). The Purchase of Intimacy. Law&SocialInquiry,25, 817-848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2000.tb00162.x
[150]
Zelizer, V. A. (2005). ThePurchase of Intimacy. Princeton University Press.
[151]
Zelizer, V. A. (2012). How I Became a Relational Economic Sociologist and What Does That Mean? Politics&Society,40, 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329212441591
[152]
Zukin, S., & DiMaggio, P. (1990). StructuresofCapital:TheSocialOrganizationofEconomicLife. Cambridge University Press.
