Maximizing Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) Benefits in Process Industries through Implementation of e-PTW System - Ruwais Petrochemical Plant Case Study
The historical context of major industrial disasters provides compelling evidence for the significance of digitizing the permit-to-work systems and control of work processes. Catastrophic events such as the BP Texas City Refinery explosion (2005) and the Piper Alpha disaster (1988) share common root causes directly related to permit-to-work failures. The Ruwais Petrochemical Plant, an ADNOC Group company and a significant player in the world petrochemical, oil, and gas market at some time, was grappling with the limitations of a traditional work control and permit-to-work (PTW) system, a safety and operational risk that drove the organization to transform its work control process. This study was designed to investigate how organizations can maximize Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) benefits through the implementation of electronic PTW (e-PTW) systems in petrochemical operations. The research employed a single-case study methodology examining the Ruwais Petrochemical Plant implementation experience. A comprehensive audit of the existing paper-based system was conducted to identify systematic deficiencies, followed by gap analysis and market evaluation of available e-PTW solutions. Critical analysis of system functionalities was performed against identified requirements, leading to the selection and implementation of an appropriate digital solution. Process mapping techniques were employed to develop “as-is” and “to-be” workflows, whilst economic analysis examined implementation costs and operational benefits over a 12-month period. The results demonstrated successful resolution of 15 major systematic deficiencies in the paper-based system. Economic analysis revealed total implementation costs of $340,000 offset by annual operational benefits of $210,667, achieving investment recovery by month 19. Through detailed analysis of implementation methodology, operational improvements, and comprehensive economic evaluation, this research offers evidence-based insights for organizations contemplating comparable digital transitions. The results of this research demonstrate that a systematic approach to PTW digitization can address fundamental safety management challenges whilst delivering substantial operational and economic benefits for process industry organizations.
References
[1]
Yan, C., Siong, P., Kidam, K., Ali, M., Hassim, M., Kamaruddin, M. and Kamarden, H. (2017) Contribution of Permit to Work to Process Safety Accident in the Chemical Process Industry. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 56, 883-888. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1756148
[2]
Alenezi, H. and Al-Qabandi, O. (2022) A Review of Hazard Management in Petrole-um/Chemical Facilities-Fires and Explosions. NeuroQuantology, 20, 4222-4240.
[3]
Ghosh, D. (2021) Safety in Petroleum Industries. CRC Press.
[4]
Bakar, F.N.A. (2017) Assessment of Permit-To-Work (PTW) System in a Pipeline Operator Company. Master’s Thesis, University of Malaya (Malaysia). https://search.proquest.com/openview/b7cdaf8d2ff084743688edfd2141c861/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y
[5]
Jahangiri, M., Hoboubi, N., Rostamabadi, A., Keshavarzi, S. and Hosseini, A.A. (2016) Human Error Analysis in a Permit to Work System: A Case Study in a Chemical Plant. SafetyandHealthatWork, 7, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2015.06.002
[6]
De Freitas, J.H., Pulz, M.H., Junior, F.D.A.D.S., Henriqson, É. and Júnior, M.M.C. (2023) Safety Artifacts in Oil and Gas Industry: An Analysis of Permit-To-Work Process. Proceeding of the 33rd European Safety and Reliability Conference, Southampton, 3-8 September 2023, 2405-2412. https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-8071-1_p313-cd
[7]
Okoh, P. (2015) Maintenance Strategies for Major Accident Prevention. NTNU Open. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2364856/OKOH_Peter.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
[8]
Chan, S. (2012) Calculated Benefits of Electronic PTW Systems. Sage Technology. https://www.scribd.com/document/476969782/Sage-Technology-Calculated-Benefits-of-Electronic-PTW-Systems
[9]
Amm, H. (2021) Effectiveness of Permit to Work Systems Narrative. Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2021) Future Trends and Applications, Dubrovnik, 23-25 September 2021. http://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001196
[10]
De Lima-Omorog, C., Sias, J.N.S. and Benosa, B.D. (2018) eBPS: Electronic Building Permit System. 2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment and Management (HNICEM), Baguio City, 29 November-2 December 2018, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/hnicem.2018.8666279
[11]
Gichuru, S.M. (2023) Effectiveness of E-Development Permit System in the Management of Development Applications and Approvals in Nairobi City County. Master’s Thesis, University of Nairobi. https://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/163972
[12]
Reddy, V. and Reddy, I. (2015) Study of Electronic Work Permit System in Oil and Gas Industry-Kuwait. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 2, 533-537.
[13]
Yin, R.K. (2018) Case Study Research and Applications (Vol. 6). Sage.
[14]
Carter, S. (2020) Case Study Method and Research Design: Flexibility or Availability for the Novice Researcher? In: van Rensburg, H. and O’Neill, S., Eds., Inclusive Theory and Practice in Special Education, IGI Global, 301-326. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2901-0.ch015
[15]
Hancock, D.R., Algozzine, B. and Lim, J.H. (2021) Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. Teachers College Press.
[16]
Shu, L., Mukherjee, M., Pecht, M., Crespi, N. and Han, S.N. (2018) Challenges and Research Issues of Data Management in IoT for Large-Scale Petrochemical Plants. IEEESystemsJournal, 12, 2509-2523. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsyst.2017.2700268
[17]
Creswell, J.W. and Clark, V.L.P. (2017) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications.
[18]
Kadri, S.H. (2021) CCPS Risk Based Process Safety Management System [RBPS]. Centre for Chemical Process Safety. https://www.aiche.org/sites/default/files/docs/events/ccps_rbps_overview_-_06202022.pdf
[19]
Rule, P. and John, V.M. (2015) A Necessary Dialogue: Theory in Case Study Research. InternationalJournalofQualitativeMethods, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915611575
[20]
Mah, A. (2023) Petrochemical Planet: Multi Scalar Battles of Industrial Transformation. Duke University Press, 241.
[21]
Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E. and Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2019) Theorising from Case Studies: Towards a Pluralist Future for International Business Research. In: Eden, L., Nielsen, B.B. and Verbeke, A., Eds., Research Methods in International Business, Springer, 171-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22113-3_9
[22]
Wang, B., Zhou, J. and Wang, Y. (2024) Enhancing Process Safety Management through Evidence-Based Process Safety Management (EBPSM): A Theoretical Framework and Case Analysis. JournalofLossPreventionintheProcessIndustries, 91, Article ID: 105381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105381
[23]
Nugroho, D.B., Latief, Y., Wibowo, M.A., Arifuddin, R., Lestari, F. and Akram, M.N. (2024) Development of a Framework for Risk-Based Integrated Safety Audit to Enhance Construction Safety Performance. CivilEngineeringJournal, 10, 779-795. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2024-010-03-08
[24]
British Standards Institution (2018) BS ISO 45001: 2018: Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems-Requirements with Guidance for Use. BSI Standards Limited.
[25]
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) (2010) Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety. John Wiley & Sons.
[26]
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2023) IEC 61511: Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry. GT Engineering. https://www.gt-engineering.it/en/technical-standards/en-iec-standards/iec-61511-gt-engineering/
[27]
Xenia Team (2024) The Comprehensive Guide to ISO 45001 Health and Safety Management System. Xenia. https://www.xenia.team/articles/iso-45001-health-and-safety-management-system
[28]
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2013) ISO/IEC 19510:2013: Information Technology—Object Management Group Business Process Model and Notation. ISO/IEC. https://www.iso.org/standard/62652.html
[29]
GM International (2021) IEC 61511 Safety Lifecycle Mini Guide. GMI. https://news.gminternational.com/iec-61151-safety-lifecycle-mini-guide
[30]
Donaldson, B., Shah, B. and Daher, E. (2015) Comprehensive Gap Assessment of Complete Safety Management Systems with Systematic Analysis and Recommendations-A Successful Case Study. SPELatinAmericanandCaribbeanHealth, Safety, EnvironmentandSustainabilityConference, Bogotá, 7-8 July 2015, SPE-174109-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174109-ms
[31]
Achumie, G.O., Oyegbade, I.K., Igwe, A.N., Ofodile, O.C. and Azubuike, C. (2022) A Conceptual Model for Reducing Occupational Exposure Risks in High-Risk Manufacturing and Petrochemical Industries through Industrial Hygiene Practices. InternationalJournalofSocialScienceExceptionalResearch, 1, 26-37. https://doi.org/10.54660/ijsser.2022.1.1.26-37
[32]
Birkel, H.S., Veile, J.W., Müller, J.M., Hartmann, E. and Voigt, K. (2019) Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers. Sustainability, 11, Article 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020384
[33]
Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., Sharma, M. and Kumar, V. (2020) Review on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Sustainable Manufacturing Decision Making. InternationalJournalofSustainableEngineering, 14, 202-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1866708
[34]
Kozłowska, J. (2022) Methods of Multi-Criteria Analysis in Technology Selection and Technology Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review. EngineeringManagementinProductionandServices, 14, 116-137. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2022-0021
[35]
Simsekler, M.C.E., Ward, J.R. and Clarkson, P.J. (2018) Evaluation of System Mapping Approaches in Identifying Patient Safety Risks. InternationalJournalforQualityinHealthCare, 30, 227-233. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx176
[36]
Bowles, D.E. and Gardiner, L.R. (2018) Supporting Process Improvements with Process Mapping and System Dynamics. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67, 1255-1270.
[37]
Object Management Group (OMG) (2014) Business Process Model and Notation. Standards Development Organization. https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN
[38]
Fauzi Rahman Jayaraman, S.N.B., Shariff, A.M. and Zaini, D. (2019) Stakeholder Outreach on Process Safety for Process Industry Using Risk Based Approaches. ProcessSafetyProgress, 39, e12130. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12130
[39]
American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) (2022) Project Evaluation: Operating Cost Estimating and Financial Analysis. AIChE Institute for Learning and Innovation. https://www.aiche.org/ili/academy/courses/ch140/project-evaluation-cost-estimating-and-financial-analysis
[40]
Palepu, K.G., Healy, P.M., Wright, S., Bradbury, M. and Coulton, J. (2020) Business Analysis and Valuation: Using Financial Statements. Cengage AU.
[41]
American Psychological Association (APA) (2017) Ethical Principles of Psycholo-gists and Code of Conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
[42]
Marková, I., Zadeh, S. and Zittoun, T. (2019) Introduction to the Special Issue on Generalisation from Dialogical Single Case Studies. Culture&Psychology, 26, 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x19888193
[43]
Kazdin, A.E. (2020) Single-Case Experimental Designs: Characteristics, Changes, and Challenges. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 115, 56-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.638
[44]
Chevalier, A. (2020) Optimization of Software License Placement in the Cloud for Economical and Efficient Deployment. Master’s Thesis, Université de Lyon. https://theses.hal.science/tel-03099617/
[45]
Mandolini, M., Marilungo, E. and Germani, M. (2017) A TCO Model for Supporting the Configuration of Industrial Plants. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1940-1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.339
[46]
Roda, I. and Garetti, M. (2019) Application of a Performance-Driven Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Evaluation Model for Physical Asset Management. Value Based and Intelligent Asset Management: Mastering the Asset Management Transformation in Industrial Plants and Infrastructures (pp. 65-78). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[47]
Landscheidt, S. and Kans, M. (2016) Method for Assessing the Total Cost of Ownership of Industrial Robots. Procedia CIRP, 57, 746-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.129
[48]
Oro Team (2023) Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for eCommerce. OroCommerce. https://oroinc.com/b2b-ecommerce/blog/ecommerce-total-cost-of-ownership/
[49]
Frontline Data Solutions (2024) Understanding EHS Software Pricing and Costs. Frontline Data. https://www.fldata.com/ehs-software-pricing
[50]
Gharibvand, V., Kolamroudi, M.K., Zeeshan, Q., Çınar, Z.M., Sahmani, S., Asmael, M., et al. (2024) Cloud Based Manufacturing: A Review of Recent Developments in Architectures, Technologies, Infrastructures, Platforms and Associated Challenges. TheInternationalJournalofAdvancedManufacturingTechnology, 131, 93-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-12989-y
[51]
Sottini, M. (2017) IT Financial Management. Van Haren.
Pozzi, R., Rossi, T. and Secchi, R. (2021) Industry 4.0 Technologies: Critical Success Factors for Implementation and Improvements in Manufacturing Companies. ProductionPlanning&Control, 34, 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1891481
[54]
Monferdini, L. and Bottani, E. (2024) How Do Businesses Utilize Change Management for Process Optimization? A Cross-Analysis among Industrial Sectors. BusinessProcessManagementJournal, 30, 371-414. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-03-2024-0158
[55]
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (1992) Dangerous Maintenance—A Study of Maintenance Accidents and How to Prevent Them. HSE Books.
[56]
Dong, W., Jin, J., Lu, M., Ding, H., Lv, Q., Fan, H., et al. (2021) Analysis of Emergency Medical Rescue in the “8-12” Tianjin Port Heavy Fire Explosion Accident. PrehospitalandDisasterMedicine, 36, 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x20001478
[57]
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2000) EPA’s Audit Policy. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/compliance/epas-audit-policy
[58]
Abraham, K.S., Perkins, M. and Sayre, M.A. (2023) 405 The Insurability of Civil Fines and Penalties. TortTrial&InsurancePracticeLawJournal, 58.
[59]
Sendy, D. (2025) Evaluating Payback Period Calculation Methods for Photovoltaic Systems: A Practical and Parametric Comparison. Master’s Thesis, University of Southern Queensland. https://sear.unisq.edu.au/id/eprint/52911
[60]
Liu, Q. (2022) Sensitivity Analysis and Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty Based on NPV Method. 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022), 14-16 January 2022, 1861-1865. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220307.306
