This study presents an integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework for sustainable landfill site selection in Chegutu Municipality, Zimbabwe. Combining the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA), the research evaluates three potential sites against environmental, social, economic, and technical criteria. Data were collected through expert questionnaires (n = 7) and geospatial analysis, with weights derived via AHP OS software and rankings computed using Python. Results identified Site 2 as optimal (45.3% final score), demonstrating superior performance in critical environmental factors: slope gradient (1.5%), water source proximity (6834.82 m), and settlement distance (3220 m). The hybrid methodology proved particularly effective in resolving conflicts between technical and social priorities, with environmental criteria carrying 61.1% weight in the AHP analysis. The study demonstrates how integrated MCDM approaches can improve municipal waste management decisions by systematically balancing ecological protection, public health concerns, and operational feasibility. Findings provide a transferable model for landfill site selection in developing urban contexts while highlighting the value of combining quantitative tools.
References
[1]
Rezaeisabzevar, Y., Bazargan, A. and Zohourian, B. (2020) Landfill Site Selection Using Multi Criteria Decision Making: Influential Factors for Comparing Locations. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 93, 170-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.030
[2]
Da Silva, F.D.L., Dos Santos, L.B.L.D. and Ricardo, N.R. (2025) Methodological Approach for the Application of the AHP Method as a Decision Tool in Mining Projects. Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering, 11, 374-384. https://doi.org/10.47456/bjpe.v11i1.47343
[3]
Makkulawu, A.R., Santoso, I. and Mustaniroh, S.A. (2023) Exploring the Potential and Benefits of AHP and GIS Integration for Informed Decision-Making: A Literature Review. Ingénierie des Systèmes d Information, 28, 1701-1708. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.280629
[4]
Nalmpant-Sarikaki, D.M., Theocharis, A.I., Koukouzas, N.C. and Zevgolis, I.E. (2025) A Comparative Analysis of Semi-Quantitative Multi-Hazard Methodologies with an Application to a Post-Mining Area. Natural Hazards, 121, 12327-12352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07282-4
[5]
Madzík, P. and Falát, L. (2022) State-of-the-Art on Analytic Hierarchy Process in the Last 40 Years: Literature Review Based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation Topic Modelling. PLOS ONE, 17, e0268777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268777
[6]
Ahmed, F. and Kilic, K. (2024) Does Fuzzification of Pairwise Comparisons in Analytic Hierarchy Process Add Any Value? Soft Computing, 28, 4267-4284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09593-9
[7]
Ayrancıoğlu, O. (2025) A Novel Approach for Reducing Judgement Inconsistencies in Analytic Hierarchy Process: Direct Weighting and Conversion in Analytic Hierarchy Process (Dwc-Ahp). Preprint.
[8]
Li, H., Dai, X., Wu, Q., Zhou, L. and Pedrycz, W. (2025) A Bayesian Analysis Framework for Decision Making with Interval Pairwise Comparison Judgments. Decision Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2024.0207
[9]
Erol, I., Neuhofer, I.O., Dogru (Dr. True), T., Oztel, A., Searcy, C. and Yorulmaz, A.C. (2022) Improving Sustainability in the Tourism Industry through Blockchain Technology: Challenges and Opportunities. Tourism Management, 93, Article 104628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104628
[10]
Ho, W. and Ma, X. (2018) The State-of-the-Art Integrations and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267, 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007
[11]
Garg, H. and Arora, R. (2020) TOPSIS Method Based on Correlation Coefficient for Solving Decision-Making Problems with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Set Information. AIMS Mathematics, 5, 2944-2966. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020190
[12]
Briceño, C.P., Ponce, P., Fayek, A.R., Anthony, B., Bradley, R., Peffer, T., et al. (2025) Optimizing Solar PV Deployment in Manufacturing: A Morphological Matrix and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. Processes, 13, Article 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041120
[13]
Lamrini, L., Abounaima, M.C. and Talibi Alaoui, M. (2023) New Distributed-Topsis Approach for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems in a Big Data Context. Journal of Big Data, 10, Article No. 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00788-3
[14]
Madanchian, M. and Taherdoost, H. (2023) A Comprehensive Guide to the TOPSIS Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Sustainable Social Development, 1, Article ID: 2220. https://doi.org/10.54517/ssd.v1i1.2220
[15]
Ozkaya, G. and Erdin, C. (2020) Evaluation of Smart and Sustainable Cities through a Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on ANP and TOPSIS Technique. Heliyon, 6, e05052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05052
[16]
Arslan, A.E., Arslan, O. and Kandemir, S.Y. (2020) AHP–TOPSIS Hybrid Decision-Making Analysis: Simav Integrated System Case Study. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 145, 1191-1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10270-4
[17]
Shi, F., Li, X., Li, M. and Bai, B. (2025) Site Selection Strategy for Photovoltaic Power Plants Construction on Gangue Hills: An Integrated Method Based on GIS and AHP-TOPSIS. Energy Strategy Reviews, 59, Article 101722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101722
[18]
Deo, P., Siddiqui, M.A., Siddiqui, L., Naqvi, H.R., Faruque, U. and Dwivedi, D. (2024) An Integrated Approach for Urban Flood Risk Prediction Using AHP-TOPSIS Model: A Case Study of Jaipur Region. Natural Hazards, 121, 4385-4445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06965-8
[19]
Jin, C., Mi, J., Li, F. and Liang, M. (2023) An Improved TOPSIS Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Β Neighborhood. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56, 793-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10510-7
[20]
Deveci, M., Pamucar, D., Gokasar, I., Köppen, M., Gupta, B.B. and Daim, T. (2023) Evaluation of Metaverse Traffic Safety Implementations Using Fuzzy Einstein Based Logarithmic Methodology of Additive Weights and TOPSIS Method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, Article 122681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122681
[21]
Sharma, D., Sridhar, S. and Claudio, D. (2020) Comparison of AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-AHP Methods in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 34, 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijise.2020.105291
[22]
Sharma, A., Aggarwal, P. and Sachdeva, S.N. (2024) Prioritization Comparison of TOPSIS and AHP to IRC: A Case Study of Kurukshetra Roads. Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 13, 22-42.
[23]
Alinezhad, A. abd Khalili, J. (2019) New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Springer, 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15009-9
[24]
Majeed, R.A. and Breesam, H.K. (2021) Application of SWARA Technique to Find Criteria Weights for Selecting Landfill Site in Baghdad Governorate. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1090, Article 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1090/1/012045
[25]
Ghobadi, M. (2024) Environmental Capability Assessment for MSW landfill Site Using Geographic Information System and Multi Criteria Evaluation. Advances in Environmental Technology, 10, 29-40.
[26]
Mozaffari, M., Bemani, A., Erfani, M., Yarami, N. and Siyahati, G. (2023) Integration of LCSA and GIS-Based MCDM for Sustainable Landfill Site Selection: A Case Study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195, Article No. 516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11112-0
[27]
Zarin, R., Azmat, M., Naqvi, S.R., Saddique, Q. and Ullah, S. (2021) Landfill Site Selection by Integrating Fuzzy Logic, AHP, and WLC Method Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 19726-19741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11975-7
[28]
Hariri, A., Domingues, P. and Sampaio, P. (2023) Integration of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approaches Adapted for Quality Function Deployment: An Analytical Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40, 2326-2350. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-02-2022-0058
[29]
Liao, H., He, Y., Wu, X., Wu, Z. and Bausys, R. (2023) Reimagining Multi-Criterion Decision Making by Data-Driven Methods Based on Machine Learning: A Literature Review. Information Fusion, 100, Article 101970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101970
[30]
Amaral, C., Isabel Pedro, M., Cunha Ferreira, D. and Cunha Marques, R. (2022) Performance and Its Determinants in the Portuguese Municipal Solid Waste Utilities. Waste Management, 139, 70-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.020
[31]
Bhuiyan, M.S.I., Rahman, A., Loladze, I., Das, S. and Kim, P.J. (2023) Subsurface Fertilization Boosts Crop Yields and Lowers Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Global Meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 876, Article 162712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162712
[32]
Al-Fares, R.A. (2024) Optimal Landfill Site Selection through the Application of GIS Analysis & Geotechnical Investigation. Annals of GIS, 30, 383-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2024.2390409
[33]
Öner, G., Akgün, H., Koçkar, M.K. and Arslan Kelam, A. (2025) Municipal Landfill Site Selection Using TOPSIS Methodology: A Case Study for Polatlı, Ankara, Türkiye. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 84, Article No. 126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04146-w
[34]
Fernandez Nascimento, V., Loureiro, A.I.S., Andrade, P.R., Guasselli, L.A. and Ometto, J.P.B. (2020) A Worldwide Meta-Analysis Review of Restriction Criteria for Landfill Siting Using Geographic Information Systems. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 39, 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x20962834
[35]
Dodevska, Z., Radovanović, S., Petrović, A. and Delibašić, B. (2023) When Fairness Meets Consistency in AHP Pairwise Comparisons. Mathematics, 11, Article 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030604
[36]
Sibanda, N., Tawanda, T. and Munapo, E. (2025) Efficiency Evaluation and Performance Comparison of Third-Party Logistics Providers: AHP-DEA Approach. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 10, 1232-1247. https://doi.org/10.33889/ijmems.2025.10.5.059
[37]
Tawanda, T., Muzuka, G. and Munapo, E. (2023) Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Assessing the Risk of COVID-19 Contraction by the Urban Public through Transport Services. In: Vasant, P., et al., Eds., Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Springer Nature Switzerland, 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50151-7_7
