All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

Relative Articles

More...

Differences in Word- and Picture-Based Visual Memory Affect Memory Performance

DOI: 10.4236/nm.2025.161001, PP. 1-9

Keywords: Visual Perception, Memory, Electroencephalography, Brain Function, Neuroimaging

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background/Objectives: Word- and picture-based visual memory are negatively correlated: improving one reduces the other. Pictures are supposedly easier to remember than words because visual objects and scenes can capture attention more effectively, resulting in highly detailed memory representations. However, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unclear, and the trade-off between these two memory types is not fully understood. Therefore, this study investigated the influence of differences in visual recognition by focusing on word and picture stimuli. Methods: Electroencephalography (EEG) activity in 21 healthy young adults (9 women and 12 men, aged 20.1 ± 1.30 years) during memory tasks involving four conditions—pictures, hiragana, katakana, and kanji—was assessed. Results: The picture condition exhibited the highest EEG activity, followed by the kanji, hiragana, and katakana conditions. Further analysis revealed a tendency for significantly lower R-temporal α, R-occipital β, and R-occipital high-γ waves during picture memorization compared to the other conditions, and significantly higher central low-γ waves. However, no significant differences were observed during the recall process under any condition. Conclusions: EEG power levels, particularly R-temporal lower α, R-occipital lower β, and high-γ waves, served as indicators of memory performance. Picture presentation streamlined brain activity and can thus potentially enhance memory performance. Our findings may inform the development of targeted management strategies for individuals with dementia.

References

[1]  Kozak, S., Herz, N., Bar-Haim, Y. and Censor, N. (2021) Indirect Modulation of Human Visual Memory. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 7274.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86550-2
[2]  Gloede, M.E. and Gregg, M.K. (2019) The Fidelity of Visual and Auditory Memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1325-1332.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01597-7
[3]  Rugo, K.F., Tamler, K.N., Woodman, G.F. and Maxcey, A.M. (2017) Recognition-induced Forgetting of Faces in Visual Long-Term Memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1878-1885.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1419-1
[4]  Wang, M., Liu, B. and Liu, Z. (2004) Event-Related Brain Potentials during Visual Sentence Reading and Picture Recognition Memory Tasks. The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, San Francisco, 1-5 September 2004, 4447-4450.
https://doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2004.1404236
[5]  Grady, C.L., McIntosh, A.R., Rajah, M.N. and Craik, F.I.M. (1998) Neural Correlates of the Episodic Encoding of Pictures and Words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 2703-2708.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.5.2703
[6]  Johnson, E.L., Kam, J.W.Y., Tzovara, A. and Knight, R.T. (2020) Insights into Human Cognition from Intracranial EEG: A Review of Audition, Memory, Internal Cognition, and Causality. Journal of Neural Engineering, 17, Article ID: 051001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abb7a5
[7]  World Medical Association (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA, 310, 2191-2194.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
[8]  Gunawardena, R., Sarrigiannis, P.G., Blackburn, D.J. and He, F. (2023) Kernel-based Nonlinear Manifold Learning for EEG-Based Functional Connectivity Analysis and Channel Selection with Application to Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuroscience, 523, 140-156.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.05.033
[9]  Matsuo, M., Higuchi, T., Miyabara, H., Higashijima, M., Oshikawa, T., Nakamura, M., et al. (2023) Assessing Attentional Task-Related Electroencephalogram Signal Variations by Using Mobile Electroencephalogram Technology: An Experimental Study. Medicine, 102, e35801.
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000035801
[10]  Matsuo, M., Higuchi, T., Ishibashi, T., Egashira, A., Abe, T. and Miyabara, H. (2024) Enhancement of Visual Attention by Color Revealed Using Electroencephalography. Open Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 12, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojtr.2024.121001
[11]  Kanda, Y. (2012) Investigation of the Freely Available Easy-To-Use Software ‘EZR’ for Medical Statistics. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 48, 452-458.
https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244
[12]  Ortega-de San Luis, C. and Ryan, T.J. (2022) Understanding the Physical Basis of Memory: Molecular Mechanisms of the Engram. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 298, Article ID: 101866.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101866
[13]  Baadte, C. and Meinhardt-Injac, B. (2019) The Picture Superiority Effect in Associative Memory: A Developmental Study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 37, 382-395.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12280
[14]  Masarwa, S., Kreichman, O. and Gilaie-Dotan, S. (2022) Larger Images Are Better Remembered during Naturalistic Encoding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119, e2119614119.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2119614119
[15]  Matsuo, M. (2024) Decoding Attentional Task Performance Using Electroencephalogram Signals. Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery, 18, Article ID: 555999.
https://doi.org/10.19080/oajnn.2024.18.555999
[16]  Kaida, K., Takahashi, M., Åkerstedt, T., Nakata, A., Otsuka, Y., Haratani, T., et al. (2006) Validation of the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale against Performance and EEG Variables. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 1574-1581.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.011
[17]  Huang, W.A., Stitt, I.M., Negahbani, E., Passey, D.J., Ahn, S., Davey, M., et al. (2021) Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Entrains Alpha Oscillations by Preferential Phase Synchronization of Fast-Spiking Cortical Neurons to Stimulation Waveform. Nature Communications, 12, Article No. 3151.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23021-2
[18]  Labree, B., Corrie, H., Karolis, V., Didino, D. and Cappelletti, M. (2020) Parietal Alpha-Based Inhibitory Abilities Are Causally Linked to Numerosity Discrimination. Behavioural Brain Research, 387, Article ID: 112564.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112564
[19]  Fakche, C., VanRullen, R., Marque, P. and Dugué, L. (2022) Α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception. eNeuro, 9, ENEURO.0244-21.2022.
https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0244-21.2022
[20]  Griffiths, B.J., Mayhew, S.D., Mullinger, K.J., Jorge, J., Charest, I., Wimber, M., et al. (2019) α/β Power Decreases Track the Fidelity of Stimulus-Specific Information. eLife, 8, e49562.
https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.49562
[21]  Matsuo, M., Higuchi, T., Ichibakase, T., Suyama, H., Takahara, R. and Nakamura, M. (2024) Differences in Electroencephalography Power Levels between Poor and Good Performance in Attentional Tasks. Brain Sciences, 14, Article 527.
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14060527
[22]  Mathôt, S., Berberyan, H., Büchel, P., Ruuskanen, V., Vilotijević, A. and Kruijne, W. (2023) Effects of Pupil Size as Manipulated through IPRGC Activation on Visual Processing. NeuroImage, 283, Article ID: 120420.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120420
[23]  Hwang, G., Jacobs, J., Geller, A., Danker, J., Sekuler, R. and Kahana, M.J. (2005) EEG Correlates of Verbal and Nonverbal Working Memory. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 1, Article No. 20.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-1-20

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133