The study aimed to develop a customized Data Governance Maturity Model (DGMM) for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) in Kenya to address data governance challenges in military settings. Current frameworks lack specific requirements for the defence industry. The model uses Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to enhance data governance procedures. Design Science Research guided the study, using qualitative and quantitative methods to gather data from MoD personnel. Major deficiencies were found in data integration, quality control, and adherence to data security regulations. The DGMM helps the MOD improve personnel, procedures, technology, and organizational elements related to data management. The model was tested against ISO/IEC 38500 and recommended for use in other government sectors with similar data governance issues. The DGMM has the potential to enhance data management efficiency, security, and compliance in the MOD and guide further research in military data governance.
References
[1]
Alhassan, I., Sammon, D. and Daly, M. (2016) Data Governance Activities: An Analysis of the Literature. JournalofDecisionSystems, 25, 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2016.1187397
[2]
Rivera, S., Loarte, N., Raymundo, C. and Dominguez, F. (2017) Data Governance Maturity Model for Micro Financial Organizations in Peru. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Porto, 26-29 April 2017, 203-214. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006149202030214
[3]
Olaitan, O., Herselman, M. and Wayi, N. (2019) A Data Governance Maturity Evaluation Model for Government Departments of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. SAJournalofInformationManagement, 21, a996. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v21i1.996
[4]
MacFeely, S., Me, A., Fu, H., Veerappan, M., Hereward, M., Passarelli, D., et al. (2022) Towards an International Data Governance Framework. StatisticalJournaloftheIAOS, 38, 703-710. https://doi.org/10.3233/sji-220038
[5]
Kevins, J. and Brian, K. (2022) Defining Data Protection in Kenya: Challenges, Perspectives and Opportunities. SSRNElectronicJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4270712
[6]
Otele, O. (2021) Kenya’s Data Protection Regime: Challenges and Future Prospects. JournalofAfricanPolitics, 1, 66-88. https://doi.org/10.58548/2021jap101.6688
[7]
Tay, C. (2015) Factors Affecting Data Migration in the Kenya Government Ministries. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nairobi.
[8]
Bor, T.K. (2020) Military Involvement in Multi-Agency Security Operations in Eastern Africa: A Case of Kenya Defence Forces. https://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/154113
[9]
Busolo, G. (2019) The Role of Information Security Management System in Promoting African Development: A Case Study of Kenya. Master’s Thesis, University of Nairobi.
[10]
Duncan, A.D. (2021) Over 100 Data and Analytics Predictions through 2025. https://mpost.io/wp-content/uploads/Gartner-100-data-analytics-predictions-2025.pdf
[11]
Abraham, R., Schneider, J. and vom Brocke, J. (2019) Data Governance: A Conceptual Framework, Structured Review, and Research Agenda. InternationalJournalofInformationManagement, 49, 424-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008
[12]
Ekundayo, T., Bhaumik, A., Chinoperekweyi, J. and Khan, Z. (2023) The Impact of Open Data Implementation on Entrepreneurship Ability in Sub-Saharan Africa. HumanBehaviorandEmergingTechnologies, 2023, Article ID: 7583550. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7583550
[13]
Harland, P.E. and Uddin, Z. (2014) Effects of Product Platform Development: Fostering Lean Product Development and Production. InternationalJournalofProductDevelopment, 19, 259-321. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpd.2014.064881
[14]
Haraguchi, M., Funahashi, T. and Biljecki, F. (2024) Assessing Governance Implications of City Digital Twin Technology: A Maturity Model Approach. TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange, 204, Article ID: 123409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123409
[15]
David Patón-Romero, J., Baldassarre, M.T., Rodríguez, M. and Piattini, M. (2019) Maturity Model Based on CMMI for Governance and Management of Green It. IETSoftware, 13, 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen.2018.5351
[16]
Moreira, A., Hak, F. and Santos, M.F. (2024) A Maturity Model for Omnichannel Adoption in Health Care Institutions. Heliyon, 10, e38526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38526
[17]
Sargiotis, D. (2024) Data Governance Maturity Models: Assessing and Enhancing Your Program. In: Sargiotis, D., Ed., DataGovernance, Springer Nature Switzerland, 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67268-2_17
[18]
Al-Ruithe, M. and Benkhelifa, E. (2017) Cloud Data Governance Maturity Model. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of Things, Data and Cloud Computing, Cambridge, 22-23 March 2017, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3018896.3036394
[19]
Permana, R.I. and Suroso, J.S. (2018) Data Governance Maturity Assessment at PT. XYZ. Case Study: Data Management Division. 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), Jakarta, 3-5 September 2018, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1109/icimtech.2018.8528142
[20]
Imende-Obonyo, V., Njihia, J.M. and Iraki, X.N. (2024) User Readiness as a Determinant for Use of Big Data Analytics: A Case of State Corporations in Kenya. TheElectronicJournalofInformationSystemsinDevelopingCountries, 90, 241-267. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12327
[21]
Caballero, I., Gualo, F., Rodríguez, M. and Piattini, M. (2023) Maturity Models for Data Governance. In: Caballero, I. and Piattini, M., Eds., DataGovernance, Springer, 139-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43773-1_7
[22]
Lachaud, E. (2020) ISO/IEC 27701 Standard: Threats and Opportunities for GDPR Certification. EuropeanDataProtectionLawReview, 6, 194-210. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2020/2/7
[23]
Tachepun, C. and Thammaboosadee, S. (2020) A Data Masking Guideline for Optimizing Insights and Privacy under GDPR Compliance. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology, Bangkok, 1-3 July 2020, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406601.3406627
[24]
Mbanaso, U.M., Abrahams, L. and Okafor, K.C. (2023) Research Philosophy, Design and Methodology. In: Mbanaso, U.M., Abrahams, L. and Okafor, K.C., Eds., ResearchTechniquesforComputerScience, InformationSystemsandCybersecurity, Springer, 81-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30031-8_6
[25]
Creswell, J.W. (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE.
[26]
Kaushik, V. and Walsh, C.A. (2019) Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research. SocialSciences, 8, Article 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255
[27]
Şahin, M.D. and Ozturk, G. (2022) Mixed Method Research: Theoretical Foundations, Designs and Its Use in Educational Research. InternationalJournalofContemporaryEducationalResearch, 6, 301-310. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.574002
[28]
Mat Roni, S. and Djajadikerta, H.G. (2021) Data Analysis with SPSS for Survey-Based Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0193-4
Clark, A.M. (1998) The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: Moving from Positivism and Confrontation to Post-Positivism and Reconciliation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, 1242-1249. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00651.x
[31]
Corti, L. and Bishop, L. (2016) Strategies in Teaching Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data. ForumQualitativeSozialforschung, 6, Article 47.
[32]
De Villiers, M.R. (2012) Models for Interpretive Information Systems Research, Part 2: Design Research, Development Research, Design-Science Research, and Design-based Research—A Meta-Study and Examples. In: Mora, M., Gelman, O., Steenkamp, A.L. and Raisinghani, M., Eds., ResearchMethodologies, InnovationsandPhilosophiesinSoftwareSystemsEngineeringandInformationSystems, IGI Global, 238-255. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0179-6.ch012
