In the framework of the Med-Arb Modelprocess,it is reasonable to assume that the identity of the mediator and arbitrator is compatible, which means they could be the same person. This alignment is an important manifestation of the involved parties’ autonomy, aligning with substantive justice in practice and enhancing the efficiency of dispute resolution. Besides, the neutrality and impartiality of mediators and arbitrators are guaranteed by internal moderation and external supervision. The modification of the arbitrator selection procedure in theDraftAmendmentofChina’sArbitrationLaw (2021) aims to mitigate any crisis of confidence among the parties involved. To enhance this model, practical implementation necessitates the express consent of the parties, along with the requirement for the moderator to meet the qualification standards of both the mediator and the arbitrator. In this regard, the information obtained in the mediation is not allowed to be used in the arbitration. Additionally, the arbitration award needs to be reviewed, and there should be an adequate timeframe for procedural adjustments subsequent to the parties’ submissions of statements and evidence.
References
[1]
Alexander, N. (2006). Global Trends in Mediation (2nd ed., p. 263). https://doi.org/10.33196/pm200504021101
[2]
Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China (2017 Amendment).
[3]
Berger, K. P. (2015). Private Dispute Resolution in International Business: Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration (3rd ed.).
[4]
Born, G. B. (2021). International Commercial Arbitration (3rd ed.). Kluwer Law International.
[5]
Boulle, L. (2014). International Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements: Developing the ConceptualFramework. Social Science Electronic Publishing.
[6]
Brown, H. J., & Marriott, A. L. (1999). ADR Principles and Practice (p. 131, 2nd ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
[7]
Buehring-Unle, C. (1992). Co-Med-Arb Technique Holds Promise Best of Both Worlds. BNA, World Mediation and Arbitration Report, 22, Vol. 2, No. 1.
[8]
Bühring-Uhle, C. (2006). Arbitration and Mediation in International Business—Designing Procedures for Effective Conflict Management (2nd ed.). Lars Kirchhoff & Gabriele Scherer.
[9]
Cao, L. J. (2006). Combining Conciliation and Arbitration in China: Overview and Latest Developments. International Arbitration Law Review, 9, 84-91.
[10]
Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (1994). The MED-ARB Debate, Some Contributions. Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 3, 173-183.
[11]
China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) Arbitration Rules (2024).
[12]
CIETAC Panel of Arbitrators. http://www.cietac.org/index.php?m=Page&a=index&id=43&l=en
[13]
Cooley, J. (1986). Arbitration vs. Mediation—Explaining the Differences. Judicature, 69,263-264.
[14]
Deason, E. E. (2005). Procedural Rules for Complimentary Systems of Litigation and Mediation-Worldwide. Notre Dame Law Review, 80, 553-592.
[15]
Finn, M. (2021). Remaining the Dispute Resolution Epicentre: Is Med-Arb in Europe’s Future? IBAConstruction Law International, 16, 18-22.
[16]
Huberman, M. J. (2019). How to Make the Most of Med-Arb. The Resolver, 2019, 11.
[17]
Limbury, A. (2009). Hybrid Dispute Resolution Process—Getting the Best While Avoiding the Worst of Both Worlds (pp. 104-120)? Institution of Arbitrators Mediation Symposium in London.
[18]
Nigmatullina, D. (2016). The Combined Use of Mediation and Arbitration in Commercial Dispute Resolution: Results from an International Study. Journal of International Arbitration, 33, 37-82. https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2016002
[19]
Noone, M. (2006). Mediation.
[20]
Oghigian, H. (2002). Making Mediation/Arbitration Hybrid Work: A Personal Experience. Asian Dispute Review, 20, 75-80. https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2003016
[21]
Pitchforce, R. (2010). National Report-New Zealand. In Speech Delivered at the Nagoya Symposium (pp. 411-432). IBFD.
[22]
Rosoff, J. (2009). Hybrid Efficiency in Arbitration: Waiving Potential Conflicts for Dual Role Arbitrators in Med-Arb and Arb-Med Proceedings. Journal of International Arbitration, 26, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2009004
[23]
Sanders, P. (August 1996). The 1996 Alexander Lecture, Cross-board Arbitration: A View on the Future, 173, Arbitration.
[24]
Sanderson, J. P., & McLaren, R. H. (October 1995). Innovative Dispute Resolution.The Alternative, Carswell Legal Publisher.
[25]
Schmitthoff, C. M. (1988). Select Essays on International Trade Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers/Graham & Trotman.
[26]
Schneider, M. E. (2003). Combining Arbitration with Conciliation. ICCA Congress Series 76, No. 8.
[27]
Shonk, K. (2024). International Arbitration: What It Is and How It Works. International Negotiation.
[28]
Street, L. (1992). The Language of Alternative Dispute Resolution. Australia Law Journal,66, 194-197.
[29]
Strong, S. I. (2016). Realizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial Mediation. Washington & Lee Law Review, 73, 1973-2068.
[30]
Sussman, E. (2010). ADR in Business: Practice and Issues across Countries and Cultures II.
[31]
Telford, M. E. (2005). Med-Arb: A Viable Dispute Resolution Alternative (pp. 1-21). IRC Press Industrial Relations Centre Queen’s University Kingston.
[32]
Wang, M. (2009). East Meets West: An International Dialogue on Mediation and Med-Arb in the United States and China. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 9, 395-396.
