All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

Relative Articles

More...

Systemic Thinking and Intimacy Sociology—Open Questions on Contemporary Love

DOI: 10.4236/sm.2024.141003, PP. 33-53

Keywords: Complex Social Systems, Intimacy, Love Codification, Modern Contemporary Love

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Generally, men and women bind themselves driven by what they name love. Creative and identity-renewing exaltation, a revolutionary force that suddenly makes the insipidness of one’s life visible, love is a profound emotion. The transition from love to loving, from love as pure emotion to active love in a relationship, marks the difference between yesterday’s lovers and today’s lovers, over time and in societies, highlighting the social form of intimacy. What, then, is the “form” of contemporary love? Do the risks that characterize today’s intimate life mean that love has now become emptied of meaning, sucked into the semantic code of a “light” and “inconsistent” love, as Bauman seems to want? Or is there another interpretative possibility, on the line that runs from Luhmann to Giddens up to Beck? Paradoxically, is it perhaps that love seems to have no meaning because it has “too much” meaning? In the framework of the relationship between Systems Theory and Intimacy Sociology, the paper addresses these questions, revisiting to this purpose, the morphogenesis of love in the transition from solidarity without choice to solidarity without consent.

References

[1]  Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1947). Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente. Querido Verlag.
[2]  Alberoni, F. (1979). Innamoramento e amore. Garzanti.
[3]  Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bond. Polity Press.
[4]  Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine & ere Moderne. Suhrkamp.
[5]  Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1990). Das ganz normal Chaos der Liebe. Suhrkamp.
[6]  Bernard, C., & Schlaffer, E. (1981). Liebesgeschichten aus dem Patriarchat. Verlag.
[7]  Condorelli, R. (2019). Le opposizioni di senso in dissolvenza nella cultura contemporanea. L’evanescenza dell’idea di normalità e la destrutturazione dell’ordine tradizionale. In S. Aleo (Ed.), Codificazione e decodificazione, Vol. II. (pp. 329-385). Giuffrè Francis Lefebvre.
[8]  Dizard, J. E., & Gadlin, H. (1990). The Minimal Family. University of Massachusetts Press.
[9]  Elias, N. (1939). über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Verlag Haus zum Falken.
[10]  Fisher, H. (2004). Why We Love: The Nature And Chemistry Of Romantic Love. Holt.
[11]  Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la sexualité. La volonté de savoir. Gallimard.
[12]  Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford University Press.
[13]  Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home & Work. University of California Press.
https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520935167
[14]  Lasch, C. (1977). Heaven in a Heartless World. Basic Books.
[15]  Luhmann, N. (1980). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Suhrkamp.
[16]  Luhmann, N. (1982). Liebe als Passion. Zur Codierung von intimität. Suhrkamp Verlag.
[17]  Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale System. Suhrkamp.
[18]  Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Beacon Press.
[19]  Maturana, H., & Varela, F. G. (1984). El arbor del conocimiento. Editorial Università.
[20]  Morin, E. (1977). La Méthode—1. La nature de la nature. Editions du Seuil.
[21]  Morin, E. (2008). On Complexity. Advances in Systems Theory, Complexity and the Human Sciences. Hampton Press.
[22]  Negri, N., Ricolfi, L., & Sciolla, L. (1983). Complessità sociale e identità. In L. Suriname (Ed.), Complessità sociale e identità. Problemi di teoria e di ricerca empirica (pp. 13-22). Franco Angeli.
[23]  Petitot, J. (1977). Centrato/Acentrato. In Einaudi (Ed.), Enciclopedia, Vol. II (pp. 894-954). Einaudi.
[24]  Prigogine, I. (2010). Surprises in a Half Century. In R. R. McDaniel, & D. J. Driebe (Eds.), Uncertainty and Surprise in Complex Systems (pp. 13-16). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/10948637_2
[25]  Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1979). La Nouvelle Alliance. Métamorphose de la science. Gallimard.
[26]  Rositi, F. (1980). Eccedenza culturale e controllo sociale. Scienze Umane, 5, 141-155.
[27]  Simmel, G. (1921). Fragment über die Liebe. Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie der Kultur.
[28]  Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133