The nervous system makes changes in response to the continuous arrival of associative learning stimuli from the environment and executes behavioral motor activities after making predictions based on past experience. The system exhibits dynamic plasticity changes that involve the formation of the first-person internal sensations of perception, memory, and consciousness to which only the owner of the nervous system has access. These properties of natural intelligence need to be verified for their mechanism of formation using engineered systems so that a third person can access them. In the presence of a synaptic junctional delay of up to two milliseconds, we anticipate that the systems property of formation of internal sensations is likely independent of the mode of conduction along the neuronal processes. This allows testing for the formation of internal sensations using electronic circuits. The present work describes the neurobiological context for the formation of the basic units of inner sensations that occur through the reactivation of interpostsynaptic functional LINKs and its connection to motor activity. These mechanisms are translated to an analogue circuit unit for the development of robotic systems. 1. Introduction Realistic models of the nervous system are based on known features of neurons and synapses and have been integrated into microcircuits ([1, 2] reviews [3, 4]). What additional features are needed in the transfer of natural intelligence to artificial intelligence? Nervous system combines newly arriving sensory information with that of the internal sensations of retrieved memories of the past experience to make predictions. These inner sensations guide behavioral motor actions that enable survival of the animal in the physical world. The formation of inner sensations towards which only the owner of the nervous system has access is the basis of natural intelligence. Since it is not possible to study the first-person-accessible inner sensations in biological systems, it is required to replicate the mechanism in engineered systems possibly by using silicon-based electronics. Even though some of the earlier studies were focused on replicating the nervous system’s first-person properties [5], a direct approach to test theoretically feasible mechanisms has not been carried out. In order to understand the functional emergence of the mind and its operations, it is necessary to make reasonable assumptions to fill the gaps in the experimental evidence [6] and test for novel methods to approach the first-person inner sensations. The surrogate
References
[1]
K. Fukushima, Y. Yamaguchi, M. Yasuda, and S. Nagata, “An electronic model of the retina,” roceedings of the IEEE, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 1950–1951, 1970.
[2]
C. Koch and B. Mathur, “Neuromorphic vision chips,” IEEE Spectrum, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 38–46, 1996.
[3]
E. D'Angelo, S. Solinas, J. Garrido et al., “Realistic modeling of neurons and networks: towards brain simulation,” Functional Neurology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 153–166, 2013.
[4]
R. Kozma, R. E. Pino, and G. E. Pazienza, Advances in Neuromorphic Memristor Science and Applications, Springer, 2012.
[5]
F. Rosenblatt, “The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain,” Psychological Review, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 386–408, 1958.
[6]
S. Furber and S. Temple, “Neural systems engineering,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 4, no. 13, pp. 193–206, 2007.
[7]
J. Schmidhuber, “A possibility for implementing curiosity and boredom in model-building neural controllers. In from animals to animats,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, pp. 222–227, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1991.
[8]
R. H. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1998.
[9]
P.-Y. Oudeyer and F. Kaplan, “What is intrinsic motivation? A typology of computational approaches,” Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 1, p. 6, 2007.
[10]
M. Minsky, “K-Lines: a theory of memory,” Cognitive Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 117–133, 1980.
[11]
V. S. Ramachandran and W. Hirstein, “Three laws of qualia: what neurology tells us about the biological functions of consciousness,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 4, no. 5-6, pp. 429–457, 1997.
[12]
G. M. Edelman, Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
[13]
F. Crick and C. Koch, “Consciousness and neuroscience,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 97–107, 1998.
[14]
R. S. Rosenbaum, D. T. Stuss, B. Levine, and E. Tulving, “Theory of mind is independent of episodic memory,” Science, vol. 318, no. 5854, article 1257, 2007.
[15]
M. Minsky, “Machinery of consciousness,” in Proceedings of the 75th Anniversary Symposium on Science in Society, National Research Council of Canada, 1991.
[16]
A. Cleeremans, “Consciousness: the radical plasticity thesis,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 168, pp. 19–33, 2007.
[17]
K. I. Vadakkan, “Framework of consciousness from semblance of activity at functionally linked postsynaptic membranes,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 1, article 168, 2010.
[18]
B. J. Baars and S. Franklin, “How conscious experience and working memory interact,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 166–172, 2003.
[19]
K. I. Vadakkan, Semblance Hypothesis of Memory, iUniverse Publishers, Bloomington, Ind, USA, 3rd edition, 2010.
[20]
K. I. Vadakkan, “A supplementary circuit rule-set for the neuronal wiring,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, article 170, 2013.
[21]
L. M. Ward, “Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 553–559, 2003.
[22]
T. Harmony, “The functional significance of delta oscillations in cognitive processing,” Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 7, article 83, 2013.
[23]
P. J. Uhlhaas and W. Singer, “High-frequency oscillations and the neurobiology of schizophrenia,” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 301–313, 2013.
[24]
W. Klimesch, “EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 29, no. 2-3, pp. 169–195, 1999.
[25]
E. Ba？ar, C. Ba？ar-Ero？lu, S. Karaka？, and M. Schürmann, “Brain oscillations in perception and memory,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 35, no. 2-3, pp. 95–124, 2000.
[26]
J. Lisman, “Working memory: the importance of theta and gamma oscillations,” Current Biology, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. R490–R492, 2010.
[27]
M. T. Alkire, A. G. Hudetz, and G. Tononi, “Consciousness and anesthesia,” Science, vol. 322, no. 5903, pp. 876–880, 2008.
[28]
M. V. Sanchez-Vives and D. A. McCormick, “Cellular and network mechanisms of rhytmic recurrent activity in neocortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1027–1034, 2000.
[29]
S. G. Hormuzdi, I. Pais, F. E. N. LeBeau et al., “Impaired electrical signaling disrupts gamma frequency oscillations in connexin 36-deficient mice,” Neuron, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 487–495, 2001.
[30]
M. R. Deans, J. R. Gibson, C. Sellitto, B. W. Connors, and D. L. Paul, “Synchronous activity of inhibitory networks in neocortex requires electrical synapses containing connexin36,” Neuron, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 477–485, 2001.
[31]
A. Mercer, “Electrically coupled excitatory neurones in cortical regions,” Brain Research, vol. 1487, pp. 192–197, 2012.
[32]
A. Selimbeyoglu and J. Parvizi, “Electrical stimulation of the human brain: perceptual and behavioral phenomena reported in the old and new literature,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 4, article 46, 2010.
[33]
K. I. Vadakkan, “Processing semblances induced through inter-postsynaptic functional LINKs, presumed biological parallels of K-lines proposed for building artificial intelligence,” Frontiers in Neuroengineering, vol. 4, article 8, 2011.
[34]
G. S. Brindley, “The site of electrical excitation of the human eye,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 189–200, 1955.
[35]
P. A. Merton and H. B. Morton, “Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject,” Nature, vol. 285, no. 5762, p. 227, 1980.
[36]
M. S. Beauchamp, P. Sun, S. H. Baum, A. S. Tolias, and D. Yoshor, “Electrocorticography links human temporoparietal junction to visual perception,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 957–959, 2012.
[37]
A. C. Burette, T. Lesperance, J. Crum et al., “Electron tomographic analysis of synaptic ultrastructure,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 520, no. 12, pp. 2697–2711, 2012.
[38]
C. A. Anastassiou, R. Perin, H. Markram, and C. Koch, “Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 217–224, 2011.
[39]
T. Lomo, “Frequency potentiation of excitatory synaptic activity in the dentate area of the hippocampal formation,” Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, vol. 68, supplement 277, p. 128, 1966.
[40]
T. V. P. Bliss and T. Lomo, “Long lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 232, no. 2, pp. 331–356, 1973.
[41]
A. Villers and L. Ris, “Improved preparation and preservation of hippocampal mouse slices for a very stable and reproducible recording of long-term potentiation,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, no. 76, Article ID e50483, 2013.
[42]
D. J. Perkel and R. A. Nicoll, “Evidence for all-or-none regulation of neurotransmitter release: implications for long-term potentiation,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 471, pp. 481–500, 1993.
[43]
K. Paradiso, W. Wu, and L. G. Wu, “Methods for patch clamp capacitance recordings from the calyx,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, no. 6, article 244, 2007.
[44]
P.-A. Buchs and D. Muller, “Induction of long-term potentiation is associated with major ultrastructural changes of activated synapses,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 15, pp. 8040–8045, 1996.
[45]
M. Maletic-Savatic, R. Malinow, and K. Svoboda, “Rapid dendritic morphogenesis in CA1 hippocampal dendrites induced by synaptic activity,” Science, vol. 283, no. 5409, pp. 1923–1927, 1999.
[46]
J. Bourne and K. M. Harris, “Do thin spines learn to be mushroom spines that remember?” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 381–386, 2007.
[47]
S. Yagishita, A. Hayashi-Takagi, G. C. Ellis-Davies, H. Urakubo, S. Ishii, and H. Kasai, “A critical time window for dopamine actions on the structural plasticity of dendritic spines,” Science, vol. 345, no. 6204, pp. 1616–1620, 2014.
[48]
P.-M. Lledo, X. Zhang, T. C. Südhof, R. C. Malenka, and R. A. Nicoll, “Postsynaptic membrane fusion and long-term potentiation,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5349, pp. 399–403, 1998.
[49]
M. Abeles, Corticonics: Neural Circuits of the Cerebral Cortex, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.
[50]
L. M. Palmer, A. S. Shai, J. E. Reeve, H. L. Anderson, O. Paulsen, and M. E. Larkum, “NMDA spikes enhance action potential generation during sensory input,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 383–390, 2014.
[51]
G. J. Rinkus, “A cortical sparse distributed coding model linking mini- and macrocolumn-scale functionality,” Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, vol. 4, no. 17, 2010.
[52]
J. R. Whitlock, A. J. Heynen, M. G. Shuler, and M. F. Bear, “Learning induces long-term potentiation in the hippocampus,” Science, vol. 313, no. 5790, pp. 1093–1097, 2006.
[53]
G. C. Baylis, E. T. Rolls, and C. M. Leonard, “Functional subdivisions of the temporal lobe neocortex,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 330–342, 1987.
[54]
A. Renart, N. Parga, and E. T. Rolls, “Associative memory properties of multiple cortical modules,” Network, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 237–255, 1999.
[55]
H. McGurk and J. MacDonald, “Hearing lips and seeing voices,” Nature, vol. 264, no. 5588, pp. 746–748, 1976.
[56]
S. Grossberg, “On the serial learning of lists,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 4, no. 1-2, pp. 201–253, 1969.
[57]
S. Grossberg, “Behavioral contrast in short term memory: serial binary memory models or parallel continuous memory models?” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 199–219, 1978.
[58]
C. Benkert and D. Z. Anderson, “Controlled competitive dynamics in a photorefractive ring oscillator: winner-takes-all and the voting-paradox dynamics,” Physical Review A, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 4633–4638, 1991.
[59]
D. K. Lee, L. Itti, C. Koch, and J. Braun, “Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 375–381, 1999.
[60]
S. Li, S. Chen, B. Liu, Y. Li, and Y. Liang, “Decentralized kinematic control of a class of collaborative redundant manipulators via recurrent neural networks,” Neurocomputing, vol. 91, pp. 1–10, 2012.
[61]
C. Mora, D. P. Tittensor, S. Adl, A. G. B. Simpson, and B. Worm, “How many species are there on earth and in the ocean?” PLoS Biology, vol. 9, no. 8, Article ID e1001127, 2011.
