Past silvicultural treatments have resulted in the high-grading mixed temperate forests of Québec, Canada. Despite recognition of this issue, the low occurrence of yellow birch ( Betula alleghaniensis Britton) within current stands raises questions about the potential of the species to grow and eventually constitute a high-quality forest resource. The objective of this study was to assess this potential using tree characteristics, forest structure and additional site and climatic conditions as predictors. A total of 145 trees were sampled in two areas located in the same bioclimatic zone. Lower-Saguenay-Charlevoix was chosen as an area where a restoration plan could be implemented, whereas Portneuf was selected as a reference. We used nonlinear mixed models to investigate which environmental factors are likely to influence the radial growth and stem quality of yellow birch sample trees. Our results suggest that topographic and climatic conditions, as well as the competitive environment of the trees, are important factors to consider in the evaluation of yellow birch production. Despite the limited occurrence of yellow birch, the potential for growth and quality was high in the Lower-Saguenay-Charlevoix area. For equivalent topographic, climatic, and competitive environment conditions, there was no significant difference in either radial growth or stem quality with Portneuf. We suggest that the economic interest of producing high quality timber should be used to justify the implementation of a restoration strategy in the Lower-Saguenay-Charlevoix area.
References
[1]
Seymour, R.S.; White, A.S.; Demaynadier, P.G. Natural disturbance regimes in northeastern North America—Evaluating silvicultural systems using natural scales and frequencies. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 155, 357–367, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00572-2.
[2]
Kneeshaw, D.; Prevost, M. Natural canopy gap disturbances and their role in maintening mixed-species forests of central Quebec, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 2007, 37, 1534–1544, doi:10.1139/X07-112.
[3]
Prévost, M. Effect of cutting intensity on microenvironmental conditions and regeneration dynamics in yellow birch-conifer stands. Can. J. For. 2008, 38, 3317–3330.
[4]
Nyland, R.D. Exploitation and greed in eastern hardwood forests—Will foresters get another chance? J. For. 1992, 90, 33–37.
[5]
Archambault, L.; Delisle, C.; Larocque, G.R. Forest regeneration 50 years following partial cutting in mixedwood ecosystems of southern Quebec, Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 257, 703–711, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.056.
[6]
Archambault, L.; Delisle, C.; Larocque, G.R.; Sirois, L.; Belleau, P. Fifty years of forest dynamics following diameter-limit cuttings in balsam fir-yellow birch stands of the Lower St. Lawrence region, Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36, 2745–2755, doi:10.1139/x06-179.
[7]
Lorimer, C.G. The presettlement forest and natural disturbance cycle of northeastern Maine. Ecology 1977, 58, 139–148, doi:10.2307/1935115.
[8]
Archambault, L.; Morissette, J.; Bernier-Cardou, M. Forest succession over a 20-year period following clearcutting in balsam fir-yellow birch ecosystems of eastern Québec, Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 1998, 102, 61–74, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00109-6.
[9]
Aubé, M. The pre-European settlement forest composition of the Miramichi River watershed, New Brunswick, as reconstructed using witness trees from original land surveys. Can. J. For. 2008, 38, 1159–1183.
[10]
Crête, M.; Marzell, L. évolution des forêts québécoises au regard des habitats fauniques: Analyse des grandes tendances sur trois décennies. For. Chron. 2006, 82, 368–382. (in French).
[11]
Boucher, Y.; Arsenault, D.; Sirois, K. Logging-induced change (1930–2002) of a preindustrial landscape at the northern range limit of northern hardwoodsm, Eastern Canada. Can. J. For. 2006, 36, 505–517.
[12]
Boucher, Y.; Arsenault, D.; Sirois, K.; Blais, L. Logging patterne and landscape changes over the last century at the boreal and deciduous forest transition in Eastern Canada. Landsc. Ecol. 2009, 24, 171–184.
[13]
Alvarez, E.; Bélanger, L.; Archambault, L.; Raulier, F. Portrait preindustriel dans un contexte de grande variabilité naturelle: Une étude de cas dans le centre du Québec (Canada). For. Chron. 2011, 87, 612–624. (in French).
[14]
Dubois, J.; Ruel, J.C.; Elie, J.-G.; Archambalut, L. Dynamique et estimation du rendement des strates de retour après coupe totale dans la sapinière à bouleau jaune. For. Chron. 2006, 82, 675–689. (in French).
[15]
Grondin, P.; No？l, J.; Hotte, D. L’intégration de la végétation et de ses variables explicatives à des fins de classification et de cartographie d’unités homogènes du Québec méridional. (in French); Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de la recherche forestière: Québec, Canada, 2007; p. 80.
[16]
Prevost, M.; Dumais, D.; Pothier, D. Growth and mortality following partial cutting in a trembling aspen-conifer stand: Results after 10 years. Can. J. For. Res 2010, 40, 894–903, doi:10.1139/X10-036.
[17]
Dupuis, S.; Arseneault, D.; Sirois, L. Change from pre-settlement to present-day forest composition reconstructed from early land survey records in eastern Québec, Canada. J. Veg. Sci. 2011, 22, 564–575, doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01282.x.
[18]
Burns, R.M.; Honkala, B.H. Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1990; p. 877.
[19]
Coulombe, G.; Huot, J.; Arsenault, J.; Bauce, E.; Bernard, J.-T.; Bouchard, A.; Liboiron, M.-A.; Szaraz, G. Rapport de la Commission d’étude sur la gestion de la forêt publique québécoise. (in French); Commission d’étude sur la gestion de la forêt publique québécoise: Québec, Canada, 2004.
[20]
Bureau du Forestier en Chef Résultats (2008–2013) des possibilités annuelles de coupe. Résultats régionaux (fiche synthèse). Available online: http://www.forestierenchef.gouv.qc.ca/ (accessed on 16 April 2013).
[21]
Ministry of Natural Resources and Fauna Québec. Ressources et industries forestières—Portrait Statistique édition 2012(in French). MRNFPQ, Direction du développement de l’industrie des produits forestiers: Québec, Canada, 2012; p. 73.
[22]
Godman, R.M.; Krefting, L.F. Factors important to yellow birch establishment in Upper Michigan. Ecology 1960, 41, 18–28, doi:10.2307/1931935.
[23]
Gastellado, P.; Ruel, J.C.; Lussier, J.M. Remise en production des bétulaies jaunes résineuses degrades—étude du succès d’installation de la régénération. For. Chron. 2007, 83, 742–753. (in French).
[24]
Lorenzetti, F.; Delagrange, S.; Bouffard, D.; Nolet, P. Establishment, survivorship, and growth of yellow birch seedlings after site preparation treatments in large gaps. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 254, 343–360.
[25]
Loagan, L.T. Growth of tree seedlings as affected by light intensity—I. White birch, yellow birch, sugar maple and silver maple. Dep. For. Publ. 1965, 1121, 1–16.
[26]
Robitaille, L.; Roberge, M. La sylviculture du bouleau jaune au Québec. Revue Forestière Fran？aise 1981, 33, 105–112. (in French), doi:10.4267/2042/21540.
[27]
Prévost, M. Effets du scarifiage sur les proprieties du sol, la croissance des semis et la competition: Revue des connaissances actuelles et perspectives de recherches au Québec. Ann. For. Sci. 1992, 49, 277–296. (in French), doi:10.1051/forest:19920306.
[28]
Laberge, V. Revue de littérature portant sur la problématique des peuplements composés de feuillus intolérants du territoire de la sapinière à bouleau jaune de Charlevoix et du Bas-Saguenay. (in French); Goupe des PDFD: Clermont, Canada, 2007; p. 42.
[29]
Robitaille, A.; Saucier, J.-P. Paysages régionaux du Québec méridional. (in French); Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune du Québec: Québec, Canada, 1998.
[30]
Stanturf, J.A.; Madsen, P. Restoration concepts for temperate and boreal forests of North America and Western Europe. Plant Biosyst. 2002, 136, 143–158, doi:10.1080/11263500212331351049.
[31]
Chaillon, P.E. Portrait de la forêt préindustrielle dans le Bas-Saguenay Charlevoix. (in French); Goupe des PDFD: Clermont, Canada, 2010; p. 113.
[32]
Prévosto, B. Les indices de compétition en foresterie: Exemples d’utilisation, intérêts et limites. Revue Forestiere Francaise 2005, LVII, 413–430. (in French), doi:10.4267/2042/5062.
[33]
Phipps, R.L.; Whiton, J.-C. Decline in long-term growth trends of white oak. Can. J. For. Res. 1988, 18, 24–32.
[34]
Le Blanc, P. Relationship between breast-height and whole-stem growth indices for red spruce on Whiteface Mountain, New-York. Can. J. For. Res. 1990, 20, 1399–1407, doi:10.1139/x90-185.
[35]
Monger, R. Classification des tiges d’essences feuillues: Normes techniques. (in French); Gouvernement du Québec, Direction des inventaires forestiers: Quebec, Canada, 1991; p. 73.
[36]
Hanks, L.-F. Interim Hardwood Tree Grades for Factory Lumber; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeasterne Forest Experiment Station: Upper Darby, PA, USA, 1971; p. 29.
[37]
Petro, F.-J.; Calvert, W.W. La classification des billes de bois franc destinées au sciage. (in French); Ministère des Pêches et de l’Environnement du Canada, Service canadien des forêts: Ottawa, Canada, 1976.
[38]
Steele, P.H. Factors Determining Lumber Recovery in Sawmilling; USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 1984.
[39]
Fortin, M.; Guillemette, F.; Bédard, S. Predicting volumes by log grades in standing sugar maple and yellow birch trees in southern Quebec, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 2009, 39, 1928–1938.
[40]
Régnière, J.; Saint-Amant, R. BioSIM 9—Manuel de l’utilisateur. Rapport d’information LAU-X-134F. (in French); Ressources naturelles Canada, Service canadien des forêts, Centre de foresterie des Laurentides: Québec, Canada, 2008; p. 82.
Mitchell, S.J.; Hailemariam, T.; Kulis, Y. Empirical modelling of cutblock edge windthrow rish on Vancouver Island, Canada, using stand level information. For. Ecol. Manag. 2001, 154, 117–130, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00620-4.
[43]
Rouvinen, S.; Kuuluvainen, T. Structure and asymmetry of tree crowns in relation to local competition in a natural mature Scots pine forest. Can. J. For. 1997, 27, 890–902.
[44]
Lorimer, C.G. Tests of age-independent competition indexes for individual trees in natural hardwood stands. For. Ecol. Manag. 1983, 6, 343–360, doi:10.1016/0378-1127(83)90042-7.
[45]
R Development Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2011.
[46]
Pinheiro, J.C.; Bates, D.; DebRoy, S.; Sarkar, D.; R Core Team. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-111; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013.
[47]
Vallet, P.; Dhote, J.F.; Le Moguedec, G.; Ravart, M.; Pignard, G. Development of total aboveground volume equations for seven important forest tree species in France. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 229, 98–110, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.013.
[48]
Wutzler, T.; Wirth, C.; Schumacher, J. Generic biomass functions for Common beech (Fagus sylvatica) in Central Europe: Predictions and components of uncertainty. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38, 1661–1675, doi:10.1139/X07-194.
[49]
Pinheiro, J.C.; Bates, D.M. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2000.
[50]
Schabenberger, O.; Pierce, F.-J. Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; p. 738.
[51]
Pinheiro, J.C. Model building using covariates in non-linear mixed-effects models. J. de la Société Fran？aise de Statistique 2002, 143, 79–101.
Drever, C.R.; Messier, C.; Bergeron, Y.; Doyon, F. Fire and canopy species composition in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forest of Témiscamingue, Québec. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 231, 27–37, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.039.
[54]
Bergeron, Y. Species and stand dynamics in the mixed woods of Quebec’s southern boreal forest. Ecology 2000, 81, 1500–1516, doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1500:SASDIT]2.0.CO;2.
[55]
Chen, H.Y.; Popadiouk, R.V. Dynamics of North American boreal mixedwoods. Environ. Rev. 2002, 10, 137–166, doi:10.1139/a02-007.
[56]
Ministry of Natural Resources and Fauna Québec. Ressources et industries forestières—Portrait Statistique édition 2010. (in French); MRNFPQ, Direction du développement de l’industrie des produits forestiers: Québec, Canada, 2010; p. 498.
[57]
Canham, C.D. Suppression and release during canopy recruitment in Acer saccharum. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1985, 112, 134–145, doi:10.2307/2996410.
[58]
Beaudet, M.; Messier, C. Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient. Can. J. For. Res. 1998, 28, 1007–1015, doi:10.1139/x98-077.
[59]
Pothier, D.; Fortin, M.; Auty, D.; Delisle-Boulianne, S.; Gagné, L.-V.; Achim, A. Improving tree selection for partial cutting through joint probability modelling of tree vigor and quality. Can. J. For. Res. 2013, 43, 288–298, doi:10.1139/cjfr-2012-0402.
[60]
Hobbs, R.J.; Higgs, E.; Harris, J.A. Novel ecosystems: Implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24, 599–605, doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012.
[61]
Havreljuk, F.; Achim, A.; Pothier, D. Regional variation in the proportion of red heartwood in sugar maple and yellow birch. Can. J. For. Res. 2013, 43, 278–287, doi:10.1139/cjfr-2012-0479.
[62]
Belleville, B.; Cloutier, A.; Achim, A. Detection of red heartwood in paper birch (Betula papyrifera) using external stem characteristics. Can. J. For. Res. 2011, 41, 1491–1499, doi:10.1139/x11-080.
[63]
Wernsd？rfer, H.; Moguédec, G.L.; Constant, T.; Mothe, F.; Nepveu, G.; Seeling, U. Modelling of the shape of red heartwood in beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) based on external tree characteristics. Ann. For. Sci. 2006, 63, 905–913, doi:10.1051/forest:2006074.
