Willow ( Salix spp.) is currently being researched as a source of biomass energy in Canada. However, it is not certain whether afforestation with willow plantations will enhance or diminish soil C storage and nutrient availability. Trees are known to have pronounced effects on biologically mediated nutrient cycling processes which can increase nutrient availability, but willows are known to be nutrient demanding. In this paper, the net effect of plantation establishment is examined at nine sites across the prairie and southern Ontario regions of Canada. Carbon, N, P, K, Ca and Mg levels in soils and harvestable biomass were compared between willow plantations and paired reference sites at the end of the first three-year rotation. Soils were depleted in total C (？2.22 mg·g ？1, p < 0.05), inorganic N (？3.12 μg·N·g ？1, p < 0.10), exchangeable K (？0.11 cmol c·kg ？1, p < 0.10) and leachable P (？0.03 mg·g ？1, p < 0.10). Exchangeable Ca was found to be consistently depleted only at the 20–40 depth. Depletion of soil K was more heavily influenced by disturbance, whereas soil N was directly affected by willow N uptake. Sites with greater growth and biocycling stabilized soil P concentrations.
References
[1]
Kopp, R.F.; Smart, L.B.; Maynard, C.A.; Isebrands, J.G.; Tuskan, G.A.; Abrahamson, L.P. The development of improved willow clones for eastern North America. For. Chron. 2001, 77, 287–292.
[2]
Richards, J.H.; Fung, K.-I. Atlas of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan: Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 1969.
Labrecque, M.; Teodorescu, T.I.; Daigle, S. Early performance and nutrition of two willow species in short-rotation intensive culture fertilized with wastewater sludge and impact on the soil characteristics. Can. J. For. Res. 1998, 28, 1621–1635, doi:10.1139/x98-142.
[5]
Adegbidi, H.G.; Volk, T.A.; White, E.H.; Abrahamson, L.P.; Briggs, R.D.; Bickelhaupt, D.H. Biomass and nutrient removal by willow clones in experimental bioenergy plantations in New York State. Biomass Bioenerg. 2001, 20, 399–411, doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00009-5.
[6]
Bauhus, J.; Messier, C. Soil exploitation strategies of fine roots in different tree species of the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 1999, 29, 260–273.
Attiwill, P.M.; Adams, M.A. Tansley Review No. 50 Nutrient cycling in forests. New Phytol. 1993, 124, 561–582, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03847.x.
[9]
Binkley, D.; Giardina, C. Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil Interactions. Biogeochemistry 1998, 42, 89–106, doi:10.1023/A:1005948126251.
[10]
Augusto, L.; Ranger, J.; Binkley, D.; Rothe, A. Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann. For. Sci. 2002, 59, 233–253, doi:10.1051/forest:2002020.
Simon, M.; Zsuffa, L.; Burgess, D. Variation in N, P, and K status and N efficiency in some North American willows. Can. J. For. Res. 1990, 20, 1888–1893, doi:10.1139/x90-253.
[13]
Kopinga, J.; van den Burg, J. Using soil and foliar analysis to diagnose the nutritional status of urban trees. J. Arboric. 1995, 21, 17–24.
[14]
Cornelissen, J.H.C.; Werger, M.J.A.; Castro-Díez, P.; van Rheenen, J.W.A.; Rowland, A.P. Foliar nutrients in relation to growth, allocation and leaf traits in seedlings of a wide range of woody plant species and types. Oecologia 1997, 111, 460–469, doi:10.1007/s004420050259.
[15]
Mitchell, C.P.; Stevens, E.A.; Watters, M.P. Short-rotation forestry—Operations, productivity and costs based on experience gained in the UK. For. Ecol. Manage. 1999, 121, 123–136, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00561-1.
[16]
Bélanger, N.; Paré, D.; Bouchard, M.; Daoust, G. Is the use of trees with superior growth a threat to soil nutrient availability? A case study with Norway spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 2004, 34, 560–572, doi:10.1139/x03-216.
[17]
Ericsson, T. Growth and nutrition of three Salix clones in low conductivity solutions. Physiol. Plant 1981, 52, 239–244, doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1981.tb08499.x.
[18]
Bormann, F.H.; Likens, G.E.; Siccama, T.G.; Pierce, R.S.; Eaton, J.S. The export of nutrients and recovery of stable conditions following deforestation at Hubbard Brook. Ecol. Monogr. 1974, 44, 255–277, doi:10.2307/2937031.
[19]
Quideau, S.; Chadwick, O.; Graham, R.; Wood, H. Base cation biogeochemistry and weathering under oak and pine: A controlled long-term experiment. Biogeochemistry 1996, 35, 377–398, doi:10.1007/BF02179961.
[20]
Hobbie, S.E. Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1992, 7, 336–339.
[21]
Guo, L.B.; Gifford, R.M. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: A meta analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 2002, 8, 345–360, doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x.
[22]
Olszewska, M.; Smal, H. The effect of afforestation with Scots pine (Pinus silvestris L.) of sandy post-arable soils on their selected properties. I. Physical and sorptive properties. Plant Soil 2008, 305, 157–169, doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9537-0.
[23]
Laganière, J.; Angers, D.A.; Paré, D. Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: A meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 2010, 16, 439–453, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01930.x.
[24]
Ens, J.A.; Farrell, R.E.; Bélanger, N. Rapid biomass estimation using optical stem density of willow (Salix spp.) grown in short rotation. Biomass Bioenerg. 2009, 33, 174–179, doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.05.012.
[25]
Ens, J. Short Rotation Culture of Willow Clones Across Canada: Growth Requirements and Implications for Soil Nutrients and Greenhouse Gas Balances. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2012.
[26]
Soil Calssification Working Group. In The Canadian System of Soil Classification; NRC Press: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1998.
[27]
Kalra, Y.P.; Maynard, D.G. Methods Manual for Forest Soil and Plant Analysis; Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1999.
[28]
Hendershot, W.H.; Lalande, H.; Duquette, M. Ion Exchange and Exchangeable Cations. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd; Carter, M.R., Gregorich, E.G., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 197–206.
[29]
Kroetsch, D.; Wang, C. Particle Size Distribution. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd; Carter, M.R., Gregorich, E.G., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 713–726.
[30]
Rawls, W.J. Estimating soil bulk density from particle size analysis and organic matter content. Soil Sci. 1983, 135, 123–125.
[31]
Jug, A.; Hofmann-Schielle, C.; Makeschin, F.; Rehfuess, K.E. Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. II. Nutritional status and bioelement export by harvested shoot axes. For. Ecol. Manage. 1999, 121, 67–83, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00557-X.
[32]
Jobbágy, E.G.; Jackson, R.B. The vertical distribution of carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Applic. 2000, 10, 423–436, doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:TVDOSO]2.0.CO;2.
[33]
Pinno, B.D.; Bélanger, N. Ecosystem carbon gains from afforestation in the Boreal Transition ecozone of Saskatchewan (Canada) are coupled with the devolution of Black Chernozems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 123, 56–62, doi:10.1016/j.agee.2007.04.002.
[34]
Six, J.; Callewaert, P.; Lenders, S.; de Gryze, S.; Morris, S.J.; Gregorich, E.G.; Paul, E.A.; Paustian, K. Measuring and understanding carbon storage in afforested soils by physical fractionation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66, 1981–1987.
[35]
Turner, J.; Lambert, M. Change in organic carbon in forest plantation soils in eastern Australia. For. Ecol. Manag. 2000, 133, 231–247, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00236-4.
[36]
Zou, X.; Bashkin, M. Soil carbon accretion and earthworm recovery following revegetation in abandoned sugarcane fields. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 825–830, doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00155-7.
[37]
Woods, P.V.; Nambiar, E.K.S.; Smethurst, P.J. Effect of annual weeds on water and nitrogen availability to Pinus radiata trees in a young plantation. For. Ecol. Manag. 1992, 48, 145–163, doi:10.1016/0378-1127(92)90127-U.
[38]
Aronsson, P.G.; Bergstr？m, L.F. Nitrate leaching from lysimeter-grown short-rotation willow coppice in relation to N-application, irrigation and soil type. Biomass Bioenerg. 2001, 21, 155–164, doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00022-8.
[39]
Moukoumi, J.; Farrell, R.; van Rees, K.; Hynes, R.; Bélanger, N. Intercropping Caragana arborescens with Salix miyabeana to satisfy nitrogen demand and maximize growth. Bioenerg. Res. 2012, 5, 719–732, doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9181-7.
[40]
Crutzen, P.J.; Mosier, A.R.; Smith, K.A.; Winiwarter, W. N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2008, 8, 389–395, doi:10.5194/acp-8-389-2008.
[41]
Scott, A.D.; Dean, T.J. Energy trade-offs between intensive biomass utilization, site productivity loss, and ameliorative treatments in loblolly pine plantation. Biomass Bioenerg. 2006, 30, 1001–1010, doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.12.014.
[42]
Chen, C.R.; Condron, L.M.; Xu, Z.H. Impacts of grassland afforestation with coniferous trees on soil phosphorus dynamics and associated microbial processes: A review. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255, 396–409, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.040.
[43]
Chen, C.; Condron, L.; Davis, M.; Sherlock, R. Effects of afforestation on phosphorus dynamics and biological properties in a New Zealand grassland soil. Plant Soil 2000, 220, 151–163, doi:10.1023/A:1004712401721.
[44]
Ellert, B.H.; Gregorich, E.G. Storage of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in cultivated and adjacent forested soils of Ontario. Soil Sci. 1996, 161, 587–603.
[45]
Likens, G.E.; Driscoll, C.T.; Buso, D.C.; Siccama, T.G.; Johnson, C.E.; Lovett, G.M.; Ryan, D.F.; Fahey, T.; Reiners, W.A. The biogeochemistry of potassium at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry 1994, 25, 61–125.
[46]
Schofield, N.J. Tree planting for dryland salinity control in Australia. Agrofor. Syst. 1992, 20, 1–23, doi:10.1007/BF00055303.
[47]
Hangs, R.D.; Schoenau, J.J.; van Rees, K.C.J.; Steppuhn, H. Examining the salt tolerance of willow (Salix spp.) bioenergy species for use on salt-affected agricultural lands. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 91, 509–517, doi:10.4141/cjps10135.
[48]
Schroeder, W.; Kort, J.; Savoie, P.; Preto, F. Biomass harvest from natural willow rings around prairie wetlands. Bioenerg. Res. 2009, 2, 99–105, doi:10.1007/s12155-009-9040-3.
[49]
Gigler, J.K.; Meerdink, G.; Hendrix, E.M.T. Willow supply strategies to energy plants. Biomass Bioenerg. 1999, 17, 185–198, doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00041-0.
