全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2008 

Animal Ecosystem Engineers Modulate the Diversity-Invasibility Relationship

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003489

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background Invasions of natural communities by non-indigenous species are currently rated as one of the most important global-scale threats to biodiversity. Biodiversity itself is known to reduce invasions and increase stability. Disturbances by ecosystem engineers affect the distribution, establishment, and abundance of species but this has been ignored in studies on diversity-invasibility relationships. Methodology/Principal Findings We determined natural plant invasion into 46 plots varying in the number of plant species (1, 4, and 16) and plant functional groups (1, 2, 3, and 4) for three years beginning two years after the establishment of the Jena Experiment. We sampled subplots where earthworms were artificially added and others where earthworm abundance was reduced. We also performed a seed-dummy experiment to investigate the role of earthworms as secondary seed dispersers along a plant diversity gradient. Horizontal dispersal and burial of seed dummies were significantly reduced in subplots where earthworms were reduced in abundance. Seed dispersal by earthworms decreased with increasing plant species richness and presence of grasses but increased in presence of small herbs. These results suggest that dense vegetation inhibits the surface activity of earthworms. Further, there was a positive relationship between the number of earthworms and the number and diversity of invasive plants. Hence, earthworms decreased the stability of grassland communities against plant invasion. Conclusions/Significance Invasibility decreased and stability increased with increasing plant diversity and, most remarkably, earthworms modulated the diversity-invasibility relationship. While the impacts of earthworms were unimportant in low diverse (low earthworm densities) and high diverse (high floral structural complexity) plant communities, earthworms decreased the stability of intermediate diverse plant communities against plant invasion. Overall, the results document that fundamental processes in plant communities like plant seed burial and invader establishment are modulated by soil fauna calling for closer cooperation between soil animal and plant ecologists.

References

[1]  Pimm SL, Russel GJ, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM (1995) The future of biodiversity. Science 269: 347–350.
[2]  Vitousek PM, D'Antonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 8: 468–478.
[3]  Schulze E-D, Mooney HA (1994) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
[4]  Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (2002) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning – Synthesis and Perspectives. New York, US: Oxford University Press Inc.
[5]  Fargione JE, Tilman D (2005) Diversity decreases invasion via both sampling and complementarity effects. Ecol Lett 8: 604–611.
[6]  Cardinale BJ, Wright JP, Cadotte MW, Carroll IT, Hector A, et al. (2007) Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. PNAS 104: 18123–18128.
[7]  Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London, UK: Methuen.
[8]  Dukes JS (2002) Species composition and diversity affect grassland susceptibility and response to invasion. Ecol Appl 12: 602–617.
[9]  Levine JM, D'Antonio CM (1999) Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15–26.
[10]  Tilman D (1999) Diversity and production in European grasslands. Science 286: 1099–1100.
[11]  Grubb P (1977) The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52: 107–145.
[12]  Milcu A, Schumacher J, Scheu S (2006) Earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris) affect plant seedling recruitment and microhabitat heterogeneity. Funct Ecol 20: 261–268.
[13]  Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78: 1946–1957.
[14]  Wright JP, Gurney WSC, Jones CG (2004) Patch dynamics in a landscape modified by ecosystem engineers. Oikos 105: 336–348.
[15]  King TJ (2007) The roles of seed mass and persistent seed banks in gap colonization in grassland. Plant Ecol 193: 233–239.
[16]  Grant JD (1983) The activities of earthworms and the fates of seeds. In: Satchell JE, editor. Earthworm ecology: From Darwin to vermiculture. London: Chapman & Hall. pp. 107–122.
[17]  Willems JH, Huijsmans KGA (1994) Vertical seed dispersal by earthworms: A quantitative approach. Ecography 17: 124–130.
[18]  Decaens T, Mariani L, Betancourt N, Jimenez JJ (2003) Seed dispersion by surface casting activities of earthworms in Colombian grasslands. Acta Oecol 24: 175–185.
[19]  Eisenhauer N, Scheu S (2008) Invasibility of experimental grassland communities: the role of earthworms, plant functional group identity and seed size. Oikos 1026–1036.
[20]  McRill M, Sagar GR (1973) Earthworms and seeds. Nature 243: 482.
[21]  Shumway DL, Koide RT (1994) Seed preferences of Lumbricus terrestris L. Appl Soil Ecol 1: 11–15.
[22]  Eisenhauer N, Marhan S, Scheu S (2008a) Assessment of anecic behavior in selected earthworm species: Effects on wheat seed burial, seedling establishment, wheat growth and litter incorporation. Appl Soil Ecol 38: 79–82.
[23]  Ayanlaja SA, Owa SO, Adigun MO, Senjobi BA, Olaleye AO (2001) Leachate from earthworm castings breaks seed dormancy and preferentially promotes radicle growth in jute. Hortscience 36: 143–144.
[24]  Decaens T, Mariani L, Betancourt N, Jimenez JJ (2001) Earthworm effects on permanent soil seed banks in Colombian grasslands. In: Jimenez JJ, Thomas RJ, editors. Nature's Plow: Soil Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Neotropical Savannas of Colombia. CIAT, 174–293.
[25]  Zaller JG, Saxler N (2007) Selective vertical seed transport by earthworms: Implications for the diversity of grassland ecosystems. Eur J Soil Biol 43: 86–91.
[26]  Chambers JC, MacMahon JA (1994) A day in the life of a seed: movements and fates of seeds and their implications for natural and managed systems. Ann Rev Ecol Sys 25: 263–292.
[27]  Anderson CJ, MacMahon JA (2001) Granivores, exclosures, and seed banks: Harvester ants and rodents in sagebrush-steppe. J Arid Environ 49: 343–355.
[28]  Thompson K (1992) The functional ecology of seed banks. In: Fenner M, editor. Seeds. The ecology of regeneration in plant communities. Oxford, UK: CAB International. pp. 231–258.
[29]  Thompson K, Jalili A, Hodgson JG, Hamzeh'ee B, Asri Y, et al. (2001) Seed size, shape and persistence in the soil in an Iranian flora. Seed Sci Res 11: 345–355.
[30]  Milcu A, Partsch S, Scherber C, Weisser WW, Scheu S (2008) Earthworms and legumes control litter decomposition on a plant diversity gradient. Ecology 89: 1872–1882.
[31]  Roscher C, Schumacher J, Baade J, Wilcke W, Gleixner G, et al. (2004) The role of biodiversity for element cycling and trophic interactions: An experimental approach in a grassland community. Basic Appl Ecol 5: 107–121.
[32]  Kluge G, Müller-Westermeier G (2000) Das Klima ausgew?hlter Orte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Jena. Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes 213. Offenbach/Main, Germany.
[33]  FAO-UNESCO (1997) Soil map of the world. Revised legend with corrections and update, ISRIC, Wageningen, Netherlands.
[34]  Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ (1996) Biology and ecology of earthworms, 3rd ed. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
[35]  Thielemann U (1986) The octet-method for sampling earthworm populations. Pedobiologia 29: 296–302.
[36]  Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (2001) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. 2nd edn,.
[37]  Elashoff JD (1986) Analysis of repeated measures designs. BMDP technical report no. 83. BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles, USA.
[38]  Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1985) Contrast Analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[39]  Meyer AH, Schmid B (1999) Experimental demography of the old-field perennial Solidago altissima: the dynamics of the shoot population. J Ecol 87: 17–27.
[40]  Schmid B, Hector A, Huston MA, Inchausti P, Nijs I, et al. (2002) The design and analysis of biodiversity experiments. In: Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, editors. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 61–75.
[41]  Burnham KP, Anderson DA (1998) Model selection and interference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
[42]  Eisenhauer N, Schuy M, Butenschoen O, Scheu S (2008b) Direct and indirect effects of endogeic earthworms on plant seeds. Pedobiologia. doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2008.07.002.
[43]  Crawley MJ (1992) Seed predators and plant population dynamics. In: Fenner M, editor. Seeds: The ecology of regeneration in plant communities. Wallingford: CAB International. pp. 157–191.
[44]  Zaller JG, Arnone JA III (1999) Earthworm and soil moisture effects on the productivity and structure of grassland communities. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 517–523.
[45]  Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310.
[46]  Fox JF (1979) Intermediate-disturbance hypothesis. Science 204: 1344–1345.
[47]  Lorentzen S, Roscher C, Schumacher J, Schulze E-D, Schmid B (2008) Species richness and identity affect the use of aboveground space in experimental grasslands. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Systemat. doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2007.12.001.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133