[1] | Daly M (1978) The cost of mating. The American Naturalist 112: 771–774.
|
[2] | Knell RJ, Webberley KM (2004) Sexually transmitted disease of insects: distribution, evolution, ecology and host behaviour. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 79: 557–581.
|
[3] | Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual Conflict. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
|
[4] | Birkhead TR, M?ller AP (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. London: Academic Press.
|
[5] | Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: Multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60: 145–164.
|
[6] | Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
|
[7] | Yasui Y (1997) A “good sperm” model can explain the evolution of costly multiple mating by females. The American Naturalist 149: 573–584.
|
[8] | Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1996) The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 263: 1711–1717.
|
[9] | Puurtinen M, Ketola T, Kotiaho JS (2005) Genetic compatibility and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 157–158.
|
[10] | Bilde T, Friberg U, Maklakov AA, Fry JD, Arnqvist G (2008) The genetic architecture of fitness in a seed beetle: assessing the potential for indirect genetic benefits of female choice. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 295.
|
[11] | García-González F, Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of polyandry: intrinsic sire effects contribute to embryo viability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 1097–1103.
|
[12] | Newcomer SD, Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1999) Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 10236–10241.
|
[13] | Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsenm A, Lifjeld JT, Kempenaers B (2003) Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature 425: 714–717.
|
[14] | Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 75: 21–64.
|
[15] | Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection and offspring viability. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36: 125–146.
|
[16] | Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Molecular Ecology 9: 1013–1027.
|
[17] | Olsson M, Shine R, Madsen T, Gullberg A, Tegelstr?m H (1996) Sperm selection by females. Nature 383: 585.
|
[18] | Tregenza T, Wedell N (2002) Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415: 71–73.
|
[19] | Bretman A, Newcombe D, Tregenza T (2009) Promiscuous females avoid inbreeding by controlling sperm storage. Molecular Ecology 18: 3340–3345.
|
[20] | Bretman A, Wedell N, Tregenza T (2004) Molecular evidence of post-copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 271: 159–164.
|
[21] | Simmons LW, Beveridge M, Wedell N, Tregenza T (2006) Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance by female crickets only revealed by molecular markers. Molecular Ecology 15: 3817–3824.
|
[22] | Holland B, Rice WR (1999) Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses inter-sexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 5083–5088.
|
[23] | Rice WR (1996) Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232–234.
|
[24] | Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2003) Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: Polyandry, Conflict and Incompatibility. Ethology 109: 929–950.
|
[25] | Bilde T, Lubin Y, Smith D, Schneider JM, Maklakov AA (2005) The transition to social inbred mating systems in spiders: role of inbreeding tolerance in a subsocial predecessor. Evolution 59: 160–174.
|
[26] | Johannesen J, Lubin Y (1999) Group founding and breeding structure in the subsocial spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae). Heredity 82: 677–686.
|
[27] | Schneider JM, Lubin Y (1997) Infanticide by males in a spider with suicidal maternal care, Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae). Animal Behaviour 54: 305–312.
|
[28] | Maklakov AA, Bilde T, Lubin Y (2005) Sexual conflict in the wild: elevated mating rate reduces female lifetime reproductive success. The American Naturalist 165: S38–S45.
|
[29] | Schneider J (1997) Timing of maturation and the mating system of the spider, Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae): how important is body size? . Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 517–525.
|
[30] | Schneider JM, Lubin Y (1996) Infanticidal male eresid spiders. Nature 381: 655–656.
|
[31] | Maklakov AA, Lubin Y (2004) Sexual conflict over mating in a spider: increased fecundity does not compensate for the costs of polyandry. Evolution 58: 1135–1140.
|
[32] | Erez T, Schneider JM, Lubin Y (2005) Is male cohabitation costly for females of the spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae)? Ethology 111: 693–704.
|
[33] | Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH (1997) The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 1282–1286.
|
[34] | Arnqvist G, Kirkpatrick M (2005) The evolution of infidelity in social monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation in females. The American Naturalist 165: S26–S37.
|
[35] | Wade MJ, Shuster SM, Demuth JP (2003) Sexual selection favors female-biased sex ratios: the balance between the opposing forces of sex-ratio selection and sexual selection. The American Naturalist 162: 403–414.
|
[36] | Fromhage L, Kokko H, Reid JM (2009) Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity. Evolution 63: 684–694.
|
[37] | Bilde T, Tuni C, Cariani A, Santini A, Tabarroni C, et al. (2009) Characterisation of microsatellite loci in the subsocial spider Stegodyphus lineatus, (Araneae: Eresidae). Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 128–130.
|
[38] | Johannesen J, Lubin Y (2001) Evidence for kin-structured group founding and limited juvenile dispersal in the sub-social spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Araneae, Eresidae). The Journal of arachnology 29: 413–422.
|
[39] | Villesen P, Fredsted T (2006) Fast and non-invasive PCR sexing of primates: apes, Old World monkeys, New World monkeys and Strepsirrhines. BMC Ecology 6: 8.
|
[40] | Oosterhout CV, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535–538.
|
[41] | Sefc KM, Koblmuller S (2009) Assessing Parent Numbers from Offspring Genotypes: The Importance of Marker Polymorphism. Journal of Heredity 100: 197–205.
|
[42] | Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2002) Assessing the statistical power of genetic analyses to detect multiple mating in fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 61: 739–750.
|
[43] | Jones AG (2005) GERUD2.0: a computer program for the reconstruction of parental genotypes from half-sib progeny arrays with known or unknown parents. Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 708–711.
|
[44] | Emery AM, Wilson IJ, Craig S, Boyle PR, Noble LR (2001) Assignment of paternity groups without access to parental genotypes: multiple mating and development plasticity in squid. Molecular Ecology 10: 1265–1278.
|
[45] | Bretman A, Tregenza T (2005) Measuring polyandry in wild populations: a case study using promiscuous crickets. Molecular Ecology 14: 2169–2179.
|
[46] | Simmons LW, Beveridge M, Kennington WJ (2007) Polyandry in the wild: temporal changes in female mating frequency and sperm competition intensity in natural populations of the tettigoniid Requena verticalis. Molecular Ecology 16:
|
[47] | Schneider J, Lubin Y (1997) Does high mortality explain semelparity in the spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae)? Oikos 79: 92–100.
|
[48] | Raymond M, Roussett F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248.
|
[49] | Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86: 485–486.
|
[50] | Kalinowski ST, Wagner AA, Taper M (2006) ML-RELATE: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 576–579.
|
[51] | Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 230–241.
|
[52] | Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between population fitness and genetic diversity. Conservation Biology 17: 230–237.
|
[53] | Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237–268.
|
[54] | Pusey A, Wolf M (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11: 201–206.
|
[55] | Houle D, Kondrashov AS (2002) Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 269: 97–104.
|
[56] | Petrie M, Doums C, M?ller AP (1998) The degree of extra-pair paternity increases with genetic variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95: 9390–9395.
|
[57] | M?ller AP, Alatalo RV (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 266: 85–91.
|
[58] | Ramirez MG, Wight EC, Chirikian VA, Escobedo ES, Quezada LK, et al. (2009) Evidence for multiple paternity in broods of the green lynx spider Peucetia viridans (Araneae: Oxyopidae). Journal of Arachnology 37: 375–378.
|
[59] | Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology 11:
|
[60] | Jensen MP, Abreu-Grobois FA, Frydenberg J, Loeschcke V (2006) Microsatellites provide insight into contrasting mating patterns in arribada vs. non arribada olive ridley sea turtle rookeries. Molecular Ecology 15: 2567–2575.
|
[61] | Simmons LW, Beveridge M, Evans JP (2008) Molecular evidence for multiple paternity in a feral population of green swordtails. Journal of Heredity 99: 610–615.
|