Background The Indian Sample Registration System (SRS) with verbal autopsy methods provides estimations of cause specific mortality for maternal deaths, where the majority of deaths occur at home, unregistered. We aim to examine factors that influence physician agreement and coding choices in assigning causes of death from verbal autopsies. Methodology/Principal Findings Among adult deaths identified in the SRS, pregnancy-related deaths recorded in 2001–2003 were assigned ICD-10 codes by two independent physicians. Inter-rater reliability was estimated using Landis Koch Kappa classification – poor to fair agreement; > – moderate agreement; > – substantial agreement; >– high agreement. We identified factors associated with physician agreement using multivariate logistic regression. A central consensus panel reviewed cases for errors and reclassified as needed based on 2011 ICD-10 coding guidelines. Of 1130 pregnancy-related deaths, 1040 were assigned ICD-10 codes by two physicians. We found substantial agreement regardless of the woman's residence, whether the death was registered, religion, respondent's or deceased's education, age, hospital admission or gestational age. Physician agreement was not influenced by the above variables, with the exception of greater agreement in cases where the respondent did not live with the deceased, or early gestational age at the time of death. A central consensus panel reviewed all cases and recoded 10% of cases due to insufficient use of information in the verbal autopsy by the coding physicians and rationale for this reclassification are discussed. Conclusion In the absence of complete vital registration and universal healthcare services, physician coded verbal autopsies continues to be heavily relied upon to ascertain pregnancy-related death. From this study, two independent physicians had good inter-rater reliability for assigning pregnancy-related causes of death in a nationally-represented sample, and physician coding does not appear to be heavily influenced by case characteristics or demographics.
References
[1]
WHOUNICEFUNFPA (2010) Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization.
[2]
United Nations (2000) United Nations Millenium Declaration. Available: http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration？/ares552e.htm. Accessed 2012 Mar 8.
[3]
Graham WJ, Hussein J (2007) Minding the gaps: a reassessment of the challenges to safe mother-hood. American Journal of Public Health 97: 978.
[4]
Cross S, Bell JS, Graham WJ (2010) What you count is what you target: the implications of maternal death classification for tracking progress towards reducing maternal mortality in developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 88: 147–53.
[5]
Fottrell E, Byass P (2010) Verbal autopsy: methods in transition. Epidemiologic Review 32: 38–55.
[6]
Chan M, Kazatchkine M, Lob-Levyt J, Obaid T, Schweizer J, et al. (2010) Meeting the demand for results and accountability: a call for action on health data from eight global health agencies. PLoS Medicine 7: e1000223.
[7]
Shiffman J, Ved RR (2007) The state of political priority for safe motherhood in India. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 114: 785–790.
[8]
Shiffman J (2007) Generating political priority for maternal mortality reduction in 5 developing countries. American Journal Public Health 97: 796.
[9]
Fottrell E, Byass P, Ouedraogo TW, Tamini C, Gbangou A, et al. (2007) Revealing the burden of maternal mortality: a probabilistic model for determining pregnancy-related causes of death from verbal autopsies. Population Health Metrics 5: 1.
[10]
Baiden F, Bawah A, Biai S, Binka F, Boerma T, et al. (2007) Setting international standards for verbal autopsy. Bulletin of the World Health Organanization 85: 570–1.
[11]
Midhet F (2008) Validating the verbal autopsy questionnaire for maternal mortality in Pakistan. International Journal of Health Sciences 2: 91–96.
[12]
Setel PW, Whiting DR, Hemed Y, Chandramohan D, Wolfson LJ, et al. (2006) Validity of verbal autopsy procedures for determining cause of death in tanzania. TropicalMedicine and International Health 11: 681–696.
[13]
Kumar R, Thakur JS, Rao BT, Singh MM, Bhatia SP (2006) Validity of verbal autopsy in deter-mining causes of adult deaths. Indian Journal of Public Health 1: 90–94.
[14]
Dhingra N, Jha P, Sharma VP, Cohen AA, Jotkar RM, et al. (2010) Adult and child malaria mortality in India: a nationally representative mortality survey. Lancet 376: 1768–74.
[15]
Jha P, Gajalakshmi V, Gupta PC, Kumar R, Mony P, et al. (2006) Prospective study of one million deaths in India: rationale, design, and validation results. PLoS Medicine 3: e18.
[16]
RGICGHR (2005) Prospective study SRS verbal autopsy form 10C, adult deaths (15 years or older). Available: http://www.cghr.org. Accessed 2012 Mar 8.
[17]
RGICGHR (2005) Prospective study SRS verbal autopsy form 10D, maternal deaths (15–49 years). Available: http://www.cghr.org/index.php/training/v？erbal-autopsy-forms-2/. Accessed 2012 Mar 8.
[18]
RGI-CGHR SC (2006) Prospective of study of one million deaths in India: Technical document VII: health care professional's manual for assigning causes of death based on rhime household reports. Technical report. Available: http://www.cghr.org. Accessed 2012 Mar 8.
[19]
CGHR (2003) Million death study. Available: http://www.cghr.org/index.php/projects/m？illion-death-study-project/. Accessed 2012 Mar 8.
[20]
Montgomery AL, Morris SK, Kumar R, Jotkar R, Mony P, et al. (2011) Capturing the context of maternal deaths from verbal autopsies: a reliability study of the maternal data extraction tool (M-DET). PLoS One 6: e14637.
[21]
White IR, Royston P, Wood AM (2011) Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in medicine 30: 377–399.
[22]
Reichenheim ME (2004) Confidence intervals for the kappa statistic. Stata Journal 4: 421–428.
[23]
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreeement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174.
[24]
RGI (2009) Special bulletin on maternal mortality in India 2004–2006. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General.
[25]
Ordi J, Ismail MR, Carrilho C, Romagosa C, Osman N, et al. (2009) Clinico-pathological discrepancies in the diagnosis of causes of maternal death in sub-Saharan Africa: retrospective analysis. PLoS Medicine 6: e1000036.
[26]
NCCEMD (2009) Saving mothers 2005–2007: fourth report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in South Africa. Available: http://www.doh.gov.za/docs/reports/2007/？savingmothers.pdf. Accessed 2012 Mar 8.
[27]
Lozano R, Lopez AD, Atkinson C, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, et al. (2011) Performance of physician-certified verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards. Pop- ulation Health Metrics 9: 32.
[28]
Ganatra BR, Coyaji KJ, Rao VN (1998) Too far, too little, too late: a community-based casecontrol study of maternal mortality in rural west maharashtra, India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 76: 591.
[29]
Kumar V, Mohanty S, Kumar A, Misra RP, Santosham M, et al. (2008) Saksham study group. effect of community-based behaviour change management on neonatal mortality in shivgarh, uttar pradesh, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 372: 1151–62.
[30]
Morris SK, Bassani DG, Kumar R, Awasthi S, Paul VK, et al. (2010) Factors associated with physician agreement on verbal autopsy of over 27000 childhood deaths in India. PLoS One 5: e9583.
[31]
Joshi R, Kengne AP, Neal B (2009) Methodological trends in studies based on verbal autopsies before and after published guidelines. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 87: 678–82.
[32]
Byass P (2011) The democratic fallacy in matters of clinical opinion: implications for analyzing cause-of-death data. Emerging Themes in Epidemiolgy 8: 1.
[33]
AbouZahr C, Cleland J, Coullare F, Macfarlane SB, Notzon FC, et al. (2007) Who counts (4): The way forward. Lancet 370: 1744–1746.
