？El inmortal？ de Jorge Luis Borges: el yo, infinitos, absolutos y vocabularios finales

jorge luis borges often consulted mathematics and imagination by e. kasner and j. newman, where they address the set theory (branch of mathematics that studies the relationship between sets) proposed by georg cantor (18451918), and in which transfinite arithmetic (beyond finite arithmetic) is established, and an epistemic system created to represent different levels of the ininite. thus, cantor labels the different levels of the ininite by assigning to each the irst letter of the hebrew alphabet, the aleph, followed by a number, depending on the level of infinite he is referring to (aleph-zero, aleph-one, etc.). following these ideas, borges weaves several narratives, discussing the ininite and the absolute. an example of such narratives is the collection of stories compiled under the title the aleph, which opens with ？the immortal？ and closes with the story that gives the collection its title. the objective of this paper is to study ？the immortal？ under the cantorian lens, so as to discuss one particular absolute, the self, and to suggest that it is impossible to establish a inal vocabulary, or a deinite deinition, about this topic. this impossibility, borges proposes, is in part due to the apparent initude of language, on the one hand, and on the other, the fallible attributes of human memory are also crucial when it comes to deining anything. however, being the ironist borges is, he is capable of providing through ？the immortal？ a re-description of these issues by means of a transinite language that resolves some paradoxes while at the same time reveals others. due to this way of writing, i propose borges fosters a continuation of the dialogue among different disciplines. though i will center my analysis on ？the immortal？, to develop these ideas i will also revisit other stories in the aleph departing from a theoretical approach rooted in the philosophy of language.