全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

The Impact of Psychological Stress on Men's Judgements of Female Body Size

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042593

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background Previous work has suggested that the experience of psychological stress may influence physical attractiveness ideals, but most evidence in favour of this hypothesis remains archival. The objective of this study was to experimentally investigate the impact of stress on men's judgements of female body size. Methods Men were randomly assigned to either an experimental group, in which they took part in a task that heightened stress (experimental group, n = 41) or in which they did not take part in such a task (control group, n = 40). Both groups rated the attractiveness of female bodies varying in size from emaciated to obese, completed a measure of appetite sensation, and had their body mass indices (BMIs) measured. Results Between-groups analyses showed that the experimental group was matched with the control group in terms of mean age, BMI, and appetite sensation. Further analyses showed that men in the experimental group rated a significantly heavier female body size as maximally attractive than the control group. Men in the experimental group also rated heavier female bodies as more attractive and idealised a wider range of female figures than did the control group. Conclusion This study found that the experience of stress was associated with a preference among men for heavier female body sizes. These results indicate that human attractiveness judgements are sensitive to variations in local ecologies and reflect adaptive strategies for dealing with changing environmental conditions.

References

[1]  Anderson JL, Crawford CE, Nadeau J, Lindberg T (1992) Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural view of the socio-biology of ideals of female body shape. Ethol Sociobiol 13: 197–227.
[2]  Brown P, Konner MJ (1987) An anthropological perspective of obesity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 499: 29.
[3]  Swami V, Tovée MJ (2006) Does hunger influence judgements of female physical attractiveness? Br J Psychol 97: 353–363.
[4]  Tovée MJ, Swami V, Furnham A, Mangalparsad R (2006) Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evol Hum Behav 27: 443–456.
[5]  Ellisson P (1990) Human ovarian function and reproductive ecology: New hypotheses. Am Anthropologist 92: 933–952.
[6]  Swami V, Tovée MJ (2005) Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image 2: 115–128.
[7]  Swami V, Tovée MJ (2007) Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans. Scand J Psychol 48: 43–50.
[8]  Swami V, Knight D, Tovée MJ, Davies P, Furnham A (2007) Perceptions of female body size in Britain and the South Pacific. Body Image 4: 219–223.
[9]  Swami V, Frederick DA, Aavik T, Alcalay L, Allik J, et al. (2010) Body weight ideals and body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results of the International Body Project I. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 36: 309–325.
[10]  Nelson LD, Morrison EL (2005) The symptoms of resource scarcity: Judgements of food and finances influence preference for potential partners. Psych Sci 16: 167–173.
[11]  Swami V, Poulogianni K, Furnham A (2006) The influence of resource availability on preferences for human body weight and non-human objects. J Articles Supp Null Hyp 4: 17–28.
[12]  Pettijohn TF II, Sacco DF Jr, Yerkes MJ (2009) Hungry people prefer more mature mates: A field test of the environmental security hypothesis. J Soc Evol Cultural Psychol 3: 216–232.
[13]  Ortigosa A, Rowe L (2002) The effect of hunger on mating behavior and sexual selection for male body size in Gerris buenoi. Animal Behav 64: 369–375.
[14]  Swami V, Tovée MJ, Furnham A (2008) Does financial security influence judgements of female physical attractiveness? J Socio-Economics 37: 1363–1370.
[15]  Pettijohn TF II, Tesser A (1999) An investigation of popularity in environmental context: Facial feature assessment of American movie actresses. Media Psychol 1: 229–247.
[16]  Pettijohn TF II, Tesser (2003) History and facial features: The eyes have it for actresses by not for actors. North Am J Psychol 5: 335–345.
[17]  Pettijohn TF II, Jungeberg B (2004) Playboy playmate curves: Changes in facial and body feature preferences across US social and economic conditions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30: 1186–1997.
[18]  Pettijohn TF II, Tesser A (2005) Threat and social choice: When eye size matters. J Soc Psych 145: 547–570.
[19]  Melamed T (1992) Personality correlates of physical height. Pers Ind Diff 13: 1349–1350.
[20]  Loewenstein G (1996) Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Org Behav Human Decision Processes 65: 272–292.
[21]  Swami V, Jones J, Einon D, Furnham A (2009) Men's preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, and ethnic group in Britain and South Africa. Br J Psych 100: 313–325.
[22]  Kirschbaum C, Pirke K-M, Hellhammer DH (1993) The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’: A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiol 28: 81–86.
[23]  Dickerson SS, Kemeny ME (2004) Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psych Bull 130: 355–391.
[24]  Swami V, Salem N, Furnham A, Tovée MJ (2008) Initial examination of the validity and reliability of the female Photographic Figure Rating Scale for body image assessment. Pers Ind Diff 44: 1752–1761, Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1752–1761.
[25]  Swami V, Furnham A, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Akbar K, Gordon N, et al. (2010) More than skin deep? Personality information influences men's ratings of the attractiveness of women's body size. J Soc Psychol 150: 628–647.
[26]  Swami V, Stieger S, Harris AS, Nader IW, Pietschnig J, et al. (in press) Further investigation of the validity and reliability of the Photographic Figure Rating Scale for body image assessment. J Pers Assess
[27]  Flint A, Raben A, Blundell JE, Astrup A (2000) Reproducibility, power, and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studies. Int J Obesity 24: 38–48.
[28]  Merrill EP, Kramer FM, Cardello A, Schultz H (2002) A comparison of satiety measures. Appetite 39: 181–183.
[29]  Cohen J (1992) Statistics: A power primer. Psych Bull 112: 155–159.
[30]  Gangestad SW, Simpson JA (2000) The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behav Brain Sci 23: 573–587.
[31]  Sugiyama LS (2004) Is beauty in the context-sensitive adaptations of the beholder? Shiwiar use of waist-to-hip ratio in assessments of female mate value. Evol Human Behav 25: 51–62.
[32]  Nelson LD, Pettijohn TF II, Galak J (2007) Mate preferences in social cognitive context: When environmental and personal change leads to predictable cross-cultural variation. In: Body beautiful: Evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives. Swami V, Furnham A, editors. New York: Palgrave. 185–206.
[33]  Tovée MJ, Furnham A, Swami V (2007) Healthy body equals beautiful body? Changing perceptions of health and attractiveness with shifting socioeconomic status. In Body beautiful: Evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives. Swami V, Furnham A, editors. New York: Palgrave. 108–128.
[34]  Von Dawans B, Kirschbaum C, Heinrichs M (2011) The Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G): A new research tool for controlled simultaneous social stress exposure in a group format. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36: 514–522.
[35]  Clow A (2004) Cortisol as a biomarker of stress. J Holistic Healthcare 1: 10–14.
[36]  de Quervain DJ-F, Roozendaal B, McGaugh JL (1998) Stress and glucocorticoids impair retrieval of long-term spatial memory. Nature 394: 787–790.
[37]  Swami V, Tovée MJ (2005) Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image 2: 383–393.
[38]  Webster GD (2008) Playboy playmates, the Dow Jones, consumer sentiment, 9/11, and the Doomsday Clock: A critical examination of the Environmental Security Hypothesis. J Soc Evol Cultural Psych 2: 23–41.
[39]  Swami V (2011) Love at first sight? Individual differences and the psychology of initial romantic attraction. In The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of individual differences. Chamorro-Premuzic T, von Stumm S, Furnham A, editors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 747–772.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133